MSFN Forum: Rating for SP2 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

If you have questions about customizing Windows XP that are nLite-specific, please post them in the nLite forum, not here. If you have questions regarding the unattended installation of Windows XP, please post them in the Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003 section.
  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rating for SP2 Rate Topic: -----

Poll: What do you think of SP2 (365 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you think of SP2

  1. genious (30 votes [10.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.14%

  2. superb (39 votes [13.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.18%

  3. great (100 votes [33.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.78%

  4. avarage (67 votes [22.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.64%

  5. not too good (15 votes [5.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.07%

  6. bad (8 votes [2.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.70%

  7. terrible (2 votes [0.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.68%

  8. give's me a headache! (15 votes [5.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.07%

  9. going to be SICK! (2 votes [0.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.68%

  10. IT'S MY WORST NIGHTMARE!!!!! (18 votes [6.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.08%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 User is offline   Aegis 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,298
  • Joined: 12-March 05

Posted 22 June 2005 - 12:47 PM

I came across an article once that showed how fast a fresh install of SP1 would become infected compared to SP2. I don't remember the exact times, but SP1 became infected in ~15 minutes, while SP2 never got infected.

#62 User is offline   Nerwin 

  • Geek.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,820
  • Joined: 31-May 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 22 June 2005 - 06:46 PM

SP2 Sucks!! :realmad: :thumbup :realmad: :thumbup

#63 User is offline   Blam-O! 

  • BLaM-O! Inc.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 351
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 30 June 2005 - 12:15 AM

computerMan, on Jun 22 2005, 04:46 PM, said:

SP2 Sucks!!  :realmad:  :thumbup  :realmad:  :thumbup
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



No Way!!! Posted Image SP2 is the best SP for WinXP so far. You must install it on a fresh system or slipstream it though..... Other then that, When M$ made SP2, ther main concern was sercurity and safety for the user. (remember when M$ anounced that SP2 would even work on most illegal copies of Windows XP? They did this to help stop all the stupid crap like Viruses and ad-aware/spyware....

If you don't install SP2, your missing out on some good features and overall better security options. IMO

You just have to know how to install windows correctly Posted Image


EDIT: Have you considerd the POLL results? Posted Image

This post has been edited by Blam-O!: 30 June 2005 - 12:17 AM

#64 User is offline   Arie 

  • One Man Army
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 27-August 07

Posted 27 February 2008 - 02:24 AM

Ehm, this thread is almost three years old... :whistle:

#65 User is offline   Justas 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: 12-September 07

Posted 18 March 2008 - 03:47 PM

Kind of funny looking back at how SP2 was looked at when it was first released...

Wonder how we will look back on XP SP3 and Vista SP1...

Share this topic:


  • 4 Pages +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy