MSFN Forum: [Release]: XPize (Off Topic) - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

[Release]: XPize (Off Topic) Rate Topic: -----

#81 User is offline   dazkrlauwste 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 27-April 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:00 AM

what's the difference betwee u'r files and his?


#82 User is offline   XPero 

  • Father of XPize / Vize
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,912
  • Joined: 08-August 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:07 AM

Removed: info about old version

#83 User is offline   dazkrlauwste 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 27-April 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:36 AM

so if u'r files and his are basicly identical except for u'r different icons/bitmaps or whatnot, u can just overwrite them and it would give no problems to his updatepack.

#84 User is offline   XPero 

  • Father of XPize / Vize
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,912
  • Joined: 08-August 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 11:53 AM

Removed: info about old version

#85 User is offline   dazkrlauwste 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 27-April 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 12:05 PM

u just combine the 2 packs, i just put XPize 2.4 in ryan's updatepack en compressed it into a rar file, i still tryin to fugure out how to compress to a cab file

#86 User is offline   keytotime 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 400
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 03:02 PM

1.Only Intergrate the Ryanvm's pack using nlite.
2.Copy all of your file's and any custom file's that you have into the i386 folder
3.Use component removal.
4.Result no space wasted :w00t:

#87 User is offline   XPero 

  • Father of XPize / Vize
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,912
  • Joined: 08-August 04

Posted 20 November 2004 - 03:08 PM

Removed: info about old version

#88 User is offline   XPero 

  • Father of XPize / Vize
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,912
  • Joined: 08-August 04

Posted 21 November 2004 - 10:14 AM

Removed: info about old version

#89 User is offline   RyanVM 

  • Like a big surly teddy bear.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,661
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 21 November 2004 - 11:39 AM

QFECheck is going to really hate the different files. The checksums aren't going to match up with their registry entries (not that that can't be worked around). Not to mention that WFP will no longer protect the files since their checksums will different from their security catalogs (can't be worked around).

#90 User is offline   Adiel 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 401
  • Joined: 04-August 04

Posted 21 November 2004 - 11:57 AM

Amazing !!

I like it , great job dude and thanks :thumbup

#91 User is offline   SiMoNsAyS 

  • C'mon you apes! You wanna live forever!?
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 3,455
  • Joined: 17-May 04

Posted 21 November 2004 - 12:04 PM

@RyanVM, QFECheck already hated them before ;)
in my case it's a problem to integrate hotfixes and the "xpized updated files".
combine both is not going to be easy but not because WFP. i would recommend to not disable wfp, the workaround can be the fix for sfcfiles.dll that can be found on this forum.

#92 User is offline   RyanVM 

  • Like a big surly teddy bear.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,661
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 21 November 2004 - 12:17 PM

SiMoNsAyS, on Nov 21 2004, 01:04 PM, said:

@RyanVM, QFECheck already hated them before ;)
in my case it's a problem to integrate hotfixes and the "xpized updated files".
combine both is not going to be easy but not because WFP. i would recommend to not disable wfp, the workaround can be the fix for sfcfiles.dll that can be found on this forum.

The only files in my pack QFECheck doesn't like are the hacked SFC_OS and UXTHEME.DLL files. Every other updated file is protected by WFP.

And I have yet to see a hacked sfcfiles.dll for SP2 which actually works correctly. Try this: with WFP enabled, integrate sfcfiles.dll into i386, install XP, then look in your dllcache directory. Even though WFP is enabled, it will be empty except for some CAT files. Not exactly intended behavior ;)

#93 User is offline   SiMoNsAyS 

  • C'mon you apes! You wanna live forever!?
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 3,455
  • Joined: 17-May 04

Posted 21 November 2004 - 02:22 PM

that is exactly how i'm running now :)
XPized XP (SP2) with sfcfiles hack and WFP enabled :P
i really preffer it this way, i like to keep windows "thinking" it has everything under WFP and i can change my system files as long as they are not in use :whistle:
this is not a problem of this pack, every shellpack will have the same problems (replacing the system files and so on) and for me it doesn't matter. for the moment i would use the temporaly solution by @keytotime keeping in mind the issue with WFP.

#94 User is offline   RyanVM 

  • Like a big surly teddy bear.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,661
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 21 November 2004 - 02:34 PM

You're missing my point. WFP is enabled, but in reality it's effectively disabled since there are no protected files in dllcache. I have yet to see a hacked sfcfiles.dll for SP2 that works correctly.

#95 User is offline   SiMoNsAyS 

  • C'mon you apes! You wanna live forever!?
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 3,455
  • Joined: 17-May 04

Posted 21 November 2004 - 02:44 PM

i didn't missed that ;) but you missed...

Quote

XPized XP (SP2) with sfcfiles hack and WFP enabled
i really preffer it this way, i like to keep windows "thinking" it has everything under WFP


#96 User is offline   RyanVM 

  • Like a big surly teddy bear.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,661
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 21 November 2004 - 03:12 PM

I fail to see the point in that. All that means is every time you change a "protected" file, Windows will complain and ask you to insert the CD since it can't find a cached copy of the file.

#97 User is offline   Adiel 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 401
  • Joined: 04-August 04

Posted 25 November 2004 - 07:06 AM

Hi , i got some problem m8 .

after extracting XPize files to I386 folder , overwriting the old ones ,

my royale theme won't apply , just the wallpaper . i guess one of the

XPize files makinf changes in taskbar or something similar , can you

tell me which file/s are responsible for taskbar / start menu change ??

Thanks .

#98 User is offline   sfamonkey 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 22-July 04

Posted 25 November 2004 - 07:14 AM

Adiel, on Nov 25 2004, 07:06 AM, said:

Hi , i got some problem m8 .

after extracting XPize files to I386 folder , overwriting the old ones ,

my royale theme won't apply , just the wallpaper . i guess one of the

XPize files makinf changes in taskbar or something similar , can you

tell me which file/s are responsible for taskbar / start menu change ??

Thanks .

did extract the files for .dl_ .cp_ .ex_? If so then how did you replace them? Finally just reapply the uxtheme.dll that should fix the problem.

#99 User is offline   MCT 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,288
  • Joined: 19-May 04

Posted 25 November 2004 - 07:16 AM

which file looks after this ?
Posted Image

#100 User is offline   Adiel 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 401
  • Joined: 04-August 04

Posted 25 November 2004 - 08:03 AM

sfamonkey, on Nov 25 2004, 07:14 AM, said:

Adiel, on Nov 25 2004, 07:06 AM, said:

Hi , i got some problem m8 .

after extracting XPize files to I386 folder , overwriting the old ones ,

my royale theme won't apply , just the wallpaper . i guess one of the

XPize files makinf changes in taskbar or something similar , can you

tell me which file/s are responsible for taskbar / start menu change ??

Thanks .

did extract the files for .dl_ .cp_ .ex_? If so then how did you replace them? Finally just reapply the uxtheme.dll that should fix the problem.

No , i didn't expanded those files if that what u mean .

and how did i replace them ? just moved them over to the I386 and overwritted the old

.dl_

files , and it worked just fine ..

(tested on VMWARE)

Share this topic:


  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy