[Bilou_Gateux]

SHLWAPI.DLL from 841356 details:
\shlwapi.dll
version 5.0.3900.6969 for users still using IE5.01SPx from original 2K source with SPx
FileCondition=IE501RTM.Files.Conditional
FileCondition=IE501SP1.Files.Conditional
FileCondition=IE501SP2.Files.Conditional
FileCondition=IE501SP3.Files.Conditional
FileCondition=IE501SP4.Files.Conditional
Install these files if IE501 RTM, SP1, SP2, SP3 or SP4 is still on the system

xpclnt_qfe_binarydrop\shlwapi.dll
version 6.0.2750.167 for users who have upgraded to no longer available IE6 a long time ago
FileCondition=IE6.Files.Conditional
Install these files if IE6 RTM is on the system "Version" "6.0.2600.0000"

xpsp2_binarydrop\shlwapi.dll
version 6.0.2800.1584 for users who have upgraded to latest available IE6SP1
FileCondition=IE6SP1.Files.Conditional
Install these files if IE6 SP1 is on the system "Version" "6.0.2800.1106"

To integrate IE6SP1 binary files into 2K source, we have to use xpsp2_binarydrop\shlwapi.dll

This HotFix was released in mid' 2004.

This specific DLL has been superceeded by the February 2005 cumulative security update 867282 which include a more recent shlwapi.dll

You don't have to bother about these 841356 different shlwapi.dll, just skip it and only use the more recent which comes with each new cumulative security update for IE6SP1.

This post has been edited by Bilou_Gateux: 22 August 2005 - 12:58 AM

[Honnes]

Thanks for the info. Was not busy with the integration those last couple of days. I know am getting this error everytime i am integrating stuff...


NTOSKERNEL32.DLL error and an NTDLL.DLL error which says that this file has been put into the memory by the cause of ntoskernel.dll.

Im dutch, so i cant put the 'english ' version here. I'll translate it when i see that error message again

does anyone has an idea what this could be ? I integrate using the hotfixes in the way i installed them on a clean pc.

Maybe i should first integrate IESP1 and then continue with these fixes, cause i have first installed a clean win2k, then i updated to sp4, then to ie6 sp1 and then i gained all these hotfixes.

[Honnes]

< removed >

I have applied all hotfixes for now to my Win 2k. This is excluding:

MDAC
IE6SP1 + fixes

----

I'll first try to get to work what i've just made, so i do know how to handle.

I now have some sort of critical problem with the following fixes (old to new)

KB891711 - fix win 2k (website?)
KB840987 - same as above
KB841533 - same as above
KB835732 - ^^
Q329115 - security update for Q329115

I had some problems with NTDLL.DLL en KERNEL.DLL

All of those hotfixes got the KERNELL.DLL within and KB835732 also got NTDLL.DLL.

When i slipstream those hotfixes (in the old to new order), then i CAN get windows to install all the stuff. But after the installation, when i login i get the message "Cant locate 175 coördinate in USERENV.DLL" (or something like that, but then in Dutch).

This has to do something with the hotfixes above, cause without those hotfixes everyone works just fine.

But i still have the problem that Windows Update claims about all those hotfixes. another ps (also located in a new topic of mine), those CAT files, are they being used or is it just something worthless ? I don't see any results of them. Hotfix still appears in WU.

Maybe i should create such a reg file after all and stick to that..

[Electrician]

@tommyp and Bilou_Gateux

I am still having the same problem as from the first attempt made.
The install goes wonderfully, except that during the "final tasks" stage, I get
an error message that a file is not digitaly signed. The more info button
says the file is IEINFO5.OC_ and I have to click on continue .
I backed tracked from my original file set untill I have the following sequence
Win2k pro vol lic Cd
Slipstream SP4
IE6 sp1 as downloaded from M$ site (not using my IEAK'd setup)
Applying ONLY DX9c and IE6
extracted IE.in_, msoe50.in_, etc from a download of XP xp1a.

Only use the setupapi.dl_ and sfc.dl_ from FDV's site. None of his other stuff.
(I don't like turning off SFC but hoped it would kill that D*** msg)

This is a s clean as it gets - ain't it?
I also apply all sec updates by using the svcpack.
Also, in testing this I have run hfNEtchk on the resulting build. It tells me that
five of the files have invalid checksums (but expected version). WU and qfechk are happy. the 5 files (even after re-applying updates) are
cryptdlg.dll, ntvdm.exe, user32.dll, ole32.dll, msadce.dll
Any ideas what the heck I am doing wrong?

Bilou_Gateux I am not clear on your procedure but I need to re-read this thread
when I still have a couple of working brain cells. (been a long day).
cao

[tommyp]

Extract the IESETUP.DL_ from the xpsp1 cd and place it in the "FIX" folder and rerun the cmd file. Or you can just extract the IESETUP.DL_ and place it in the slipstreamed source (sourcess folder).

Also, no need to add additional files into the SVCPACK folder, all you need is the HFINFS folder setup per the instructions. The cmd file takes care of the rest.

[Electrician]

@tommyp
Sorry, but already have said dll. Just left it out of original msg (brevity).
Do not have XP sp1 DO have XP sp1a CD and used it the first three go-rounds.
My XP sp1a disk is a Dell oem.
My vol lic XP CD is RTM version, and my vol lic 2K CD is SP2 (i think).

Thinking there might be something odd with the oem files, or you really are using sp1 files, I tried the ones from the service pack.

My reason for doing the updates in the svcpack is because I have had this problem from the start and wanted to reduce other factors (relating to the slipstream).

One more test I haven't tried....
I will build a disk with NOTHING but but IE6 slipstreamed, and test it - will report back shortly.
edit -Same problem with file not signed. (no patches, but no bad chksums)
Will build from non integrated source to verify that it works and
assuming it does will run your batch without even the ie integration.
btw, i always get this (i ASSumed it was not a real problem):
Could Not Find E:\w2ksp4IE6\HFFILES.TXT
Could Not Find E:\w2ksp4IE6\HFFLDRFEXP.TXT
'FILECASE' is not recognized as an internal or external command
Did I assume wrong?

[tommyp]

New download available. Removed the need for files from an XP cd. Constructive criticism appreciated.

[At0mic]

tommyp first of all I'm seriously impressed with your batch file its very very good.

When I slipstreamed IE6 into win2k SP4, the operation seems to work sucessfully. However, during the process, I noticed some "Could Not Find" errors during the hotfix part of the process. Is this normall?

Here's a screenshot of a small portion of the errors:

[tommyp]

I get those errors too, it's nothing to be alarmed about. The reason why there are errors is that it's trying to delete non-existing "dummy" file(s). I guess if I have the echo turned off then you won't see anything, but then again, it's nice to see something happening on the screen at the same time. Did you try out the slipstreamed folder?

[At0mic]

tommyp, on Mar 28 2005, 05:33 PM, said:

Did you try out the slipstreamed folder?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thanks for the reply. No I havn't tried it yet because I want to add some unattended install options to it first. I'll do it later.

I'm glad you did leave echo on. I agree its good to see whats going on

[fistandantilus]

Hi everyone May i just say excellent program TommyP, thanks for all your work

using a win2000 pro cd with sp4 slipstreamed.
I have so far managed to slipstream my cd to include directx9c, ie6.1 and the msxml and the mdac updates but I am having problems with certain updates and was hoping someone could help me as I seem to be trawling the forums round and round in circles for hours with no real success.

I added all the windows hotfix updates I could find into the respective hf1 and hf2 folders but when I install it seems a lot of them do not install and need to be reinstalled. I also seem to have a problem with Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express 6 SP1 (KB823353) which won't install from windows update it just keeps reappearing.


Does anyone have a list with which files are needed and which aren't in order to be fully up to date at install? Do they have to be in any kind of order of install.

Also I downloaded the latest silent install netfxsp11.exe .net install from this forum (forgotten who upped the file but thanks to him) that included the latest fixes. I added it to the exe folder but when I reinstall the update doesn't seem to install but when I run it after install it works perfectly. Should this file have gone in hf2 perhaps. How does the folders change how they are installed. does it change the order of install?

Sorry if this seemed like a lot of questions for a newbie here but I wanted to give it all a good go and try and fix it myself using the forums before bothering you all. I hope you can help me.

Also having trouble with the slipstreamed drivers but thats next on the list after I get the basic install fixed.

[tommyp]

@fistandantilus
Please re-read the instructions.txt file. It also happened to be the same file you you closed without reading when you ran the cmd file. The 9th line talks about windowsupdate website. ALL WINDOWSUPDATE.COM does is verify registry entries. It doesn't verify all critical update dll/exe/binaries. So if you want to make windowsupdate.com happy, then please use an alternate slipstream method.

If you have repacked your netfxsp11.exe and specified the switch in the cmd file? There's also instructions for that too in the instructions.txt file.

[fistandantilus]

tommyp, on Mar 29 2005, 09:34 AM, said:

@fistandantilus
Please re-read the instructions.txt file.  It also happened to be the same file you you closed without reading when you ran the cmd file.  The 9th line talks about windowsupdate website.  ALL WINDOWSUPDATE.COM does is verify registry entries.  It doesn't verify all critical update dll/exe/binaries.  So if you want to make windowsupdate.com happy, then please use an alternate slipstream method. 

If you have repacked your netfxsp11.exe and specified the switch in the cmd file?  There's also instructions for that too in the instructions.txt file.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't mean this disrespectful but your instructions in places are very vague, it could save some people hours trawling through often redundant messages on the forum if you spent another 15 minutes elaborating the instructions.

netfix was repackaged by someone on this forum to run silently, it adds the regs if you run it once in windows so why not in the install process?.The critical type hf1 updates are not altered in any way so how do I know if they have been run if there is no reg line added. Surely if they were run correctly they would add the regs themselves. The directx9c and mediaplayer9 files run in this way show up fine on windowsupdate.

I think I will repack windows with the updates that seem to work well such as dx9c and mediaplayer etc, and wait for sp rollout1 which is due soon. Will save me a lot of trouble. thanks anyways.

[At0mic]

tommyp, on Mar 29 2005, 09:34 AM, said:

if you want to make windowsupdate.com happy, then please use an alternate slipstream method.  <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Do you know which alternative method would make windowsupdate happy?

[tommyp]

fistandantilus, on Mar 29 2005, 09:29 AM, said:

I don't mean this disrespectful but your instructions in places are very vague, it could save some people hours trawling through often redundant messages on the forum if you spent another 15 minutes elaborating the instructions.

No disrepect taken. If you think the instructions need to be a bit clearer in some sections, then please ask and I'll update the instructions.txt file. I have tried to put the important tips in the instructions, and even put some key items on the top few lines of the file. I haven't really taken more time for the instructions because I only do this for the fun of it (i.e. not paid to do it). If you want more details please visit FDV's hotfix site
@At0mic - You may want to try xpcreate as an alternate windowsupdate friendly windows updater.

[Electrician]

fistandantilus, on Mar 28 2005, 03:14 PM, said:

I also seem to have a problem with Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express 6 SP1 (KB823353) which won't install from windows update it just keeps reappearing.

Although I have been having another problem making the disk, I noticed that as well.
When I ran the patch manually it would error out and tell me that I had to have OE 6 sp1 installed to use the patch. The OE 6 sp1 patch that can be dwnld'd from M$ also errors out and says you must be running XP.

Since the files are slipstreamed, just do Like TommyP suggests and apply the
reg hack.

[tommyp]

I attached a typical INF file that makes windowsupdate happy. For this particular one I attached, it shows the one that electrician discusses. If you save the file, do a right mouse click and select install, and then revisit windowsupdate, it will say the patch is installed. However, if you look at the contents of the INF file with notepad, you can see that windowsupdate only checks for the registry entries that the inf makes. So, if you really want to make a "secure" system according to windowsupdate, all one would need to do is do a regedit for the ones that it checks. How's that for security? This is why I ditch windowsupdate and use an alternate program.

[At0mic]

tommyp, on Mar 29 2005, 06:20 PM, said:

If you think the instructions need to be a bit clearer in some sections, then please ask and I'll update the instructions.txt file.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I do agree that the instructions could be a bit clearer. For example, it says:

E) PLACE THE 4 INF FILES INTO THIS FOLDER

Its not obvious which folder your talking about. I had to re-read those instuctions before realizing what you meant. Maybe it could say the following:

E) PLACE THE 4 INF FILES INTO THE HFINFS FOLDER

By the way, what does the POST SERVICE PACK INF FILE do?

It's a great script by the way - this thread should be a sticky. It seems to be the only way of integrating IE6. XPCreate only seems to run the IE6 installer during installation as apposed to properly integrating it like this does.

[tommyp]

@At0mic - You're absolutely correct. I re-read those instructions and realized that they were a bit vague. I recrafted the instructions a bunch and it seems to flow a lot easier now. The new download is available on the first of these threads. With the help of the electrician, I found a little bug that needed to get exterminated, thus the need for a little "correction" to the cmd file. Also, the post service pack inf file is best described on www.vorck.com. In brief words, it's the "essential" regedits that windows needs to be secure.

BTW, being a dumb computer user, what is the purpose of the MDAC version 2.8? What benefits does that have over the one that comes with W2K?

[boooggy]

well i downloaded it, extract it to a folder called slipstrem, run the script, fill the source with win2k and iesrc with ie6sp1. then i rght click and choose edit. at this stage i am blocked. dont know what to edit. can i get some help please???