btw: greets fly also to Boooggy and n7Epsilon for WMP11 Slipstreamer
nLite, hate it or love it? speak up son
#41
Posted 29 May 2008 - 07:15 PM
btw: greets fly also to Boooggy and n7Epsilon for WMP11 Slipstreamer
#42
Posted 03 June 2008 - 02:43 PM
#43
Posted 03 June 2008 - 07:03 PM
Klybalur, on Jun 3 2008, 04:43 PM, said:
What do you mean "can only use it inside a virtual machine"? Or do you mean that's how you use it since you prefer not to install .NET? I don't like .NET either but a few of my favorite tools and ATI's video driver user interface use it so I install the ones that are necessary which are usually only .NET 2.0 these days for me.
#44
Posted 04 June 2008 - 03:02 AM
but yet have many bugs
#46
Posted 04 June 2008 - 02:12 PM
roirraW, on Jun 4 2008, 02:03 AM, said:
Klybalur, on Jun 3 2008, 04:43 PM, said:
What do you mean "can only use it inside a virtual machine"? Or do you mean that's how you use it since you prefer not to install .NET? I don't like .NET either but a few of my favorite tools and ATI's video driver user interface use it so I install the ones that are necessary which are usually only .NET 2.0 these days for me.
I mean I will not install .NET on the machine I do my normal work with. So the only chance to use nLite is a virtual machine, but it's not too bad. You are right that there're some other nice tools that require .NET but for most of thoose there're alternatives without that crap. For example the ATI drivers I replaced with the modded Omega drivers a long time ago.
#47
Posted 04 June 2008 - 03:44 PM
At least .NET 2.0 is way better than .NET 1.x. .NET 3.0 and 3.5 take way too long to install though, and nothing I use requires it, so...
This post has been edited by roirraW "edor" ehT: 04 June 2008 - 03:45 PM
#48
Posted 06 June 2008 - 07:45 PM
I love and hate nlite.
Was a real nlite-junkie.
Unfortunately donīt have the time for testing anymore.
Since the "alternative runtimes" are gone, itīs very hard to use nlite on a PC where you canīt install .NET on.
Last time I installed .NET in a portable sandbox (wish I remembered which it was) and gave nlite the rights to use the data in the sandbox.
So everything worked fine.
Nlite ran, Iso built and burned, outside the box of course.
Afterwards the sandbox was deleted and no traces of .NET were to be found after ccleaner was run.
BUT BE CAREFUL !
E.g. "Sandboxie" is a good program, but in some aspects even worse than .NET.
It simply "masquerades" its "sandboxed browser" as a "service" and sneaks through your firewall unnoticed !!!
Agi
#49
Posted 18 June 2008 - 12:35 PM
Chris122990, on May 23 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
when i have more time, ill post an easy script for that... i custom brand all my oem installs...
#50
Posted 21 June 2008 - 06:05 AM
Even for non gamers it's useful, speeds up your boot process, and can even get rid of some security issues. It doesn't cause errors and problems if you know what your doing
Can't beat it, great app!!!!!
#52
Posted 21 April 2010 - 06:18 PM
#54
Posted 17 May 2010 - 03:29 PM
I don't like it because when I used it to integrate only SP2 and a small number of patches -- as well as get rid of a lot of unwanted junk (Outlook Express, Microsoft Office, games, IIS, and more) -- the end product was too big to fit on a CD!
It would be better if it actually deleted from your source tree the files you don't want to install.
So I put the project on the back shelf until I had time to learn the manual (MSFN) way.



Help
Back to top









