re: kb885835 & kb885250
#41
Posted 11 February 2005 - 07:15 AM
#42
Posted 11 February 2005 - 07:33 AM
beppemito, on Feb 11 2005, 12:47 AM, said:
KB834707=SP2GDR
[KB834707]
mshtml.dll
urlmon.dll
browseui.dll
shdocvw.dll
wininet.dll
can i delete this? why i've got 867282....
anyone?
#43
Posted 11 February 2005 - 07:37 AM
I got the NetFrameWork down to 11.4 thanks to EvilVoice's Advice.
i am uploading 2a ftp site now i will give u a link later.
Quote
the guide on page one is so simple... u can use nlite to install the first
hotfix then pull it out
use nlite again to install the rest of the hotfix.
integrate the code. that is it.
#44
Posted 11 February 2005 - 09:52 PM
Quote
I understand that Hotfix KB885250 and Hotfix KB885835 cannot be integrated.
I have performed further research on this issue and this feature is by design.
Based on the current situation, we have two options:
1. We can wait for Service Pack 3 which will be the next Service Pack and Microsoft will release it in the near feature. All the hotfixes will be included in Service Pack 3 and this issue will be fixed in SP3.
2. We can choose either of the hotfixes to be integrated. Actually, both the hotfixes are not of the final version.
Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation. I am looking forward to your reply.
2 is kind of scary: Actually, both the hotfixes are not of the final version.
Yet they have released it anyhow. So would that make them BETA?
#46
Posted 12 February 2005 - 04:37 AM
When do u use SVCPACK.INF Method or Nlite , do u still see which hotfixes are installed under "add / remove programs" ?
I've tried nlite, but i don't see anything under "add/remove programs" after integrating hotfixes.
thx
#47
Posted 12 February 2005 - 04:44 AM
i know that if i integrate manually using the /integrate command
i dont see it in add remove programs
which means i think if u follow the guide at msfn.org u will see
the hotfixes in add remove but why would u?
#48
Posted 12 February 2005 - 04:51 AM
With nlite i dont see that. i'll try the old SVCPACK.INF method.
#50
Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:04 AM
#51
Posted 13 February 2005 - 08:28 AM
But i prefer this method. It s easier to maintain than integrating all hotfixes (with nlite for ex.)
#52
Posted 13 February 2005 - 12:17 PM
Quote
Going forward, I will be working with you to address the issue as soon as possible. To contact me, you may directly send emails to my account: xxxxxxx@mssupport.microsoft.com with the case ID SRZxxxxxxxxxxx.
As I understand, Windows Update 885250 cannot be integrated to a folder after Windows Update 885835 is integrated to that folder.
I would like to explain that neither 885250 nor 885835 is a beta update. Microsoft keeps release Windows Update to improve the security of the systems. Xxxxxx means that Microsoft will still release updates to update the files updated by 885250 if a potential problem is found in the files. The updates are fully tested before they are released.
To provide you with the most accurate support, please let me know the error message appears when you try to use the \integrate switch to integrate the update to the folder.
Please capture a screenshot when the issue happens:
1) Press the Print Screen key (PrtScn) on your keyboard.
2) Click Start, click Run, type MSPAINT, and click OK.
3) In Paint, click Paste under the Edit menu, click Save under the File menu, type a file name for the snap shot, choose JPEG as "Save as type", and click Save.
4) Please send this file to the email account: xxxxxx@mssupport.microsoft.com
Please try the suggestions above on your side and provide me with the results at your earliest convenience. If anything in my e-mail is unclear or you need further help, don't hesitate to let me know. It is my pleasure to be of assistance.
I am looking forward to your reply.
I have just finish taking his snapshots, I did one whith 885835 first and another with 885250 first, the exact same error, but just for his reference. I actually installed the hotfixes in different orders, one numerically the other but release date.
Will post any response.
#53
Posted 15 February 2005 - 01:31 PM
#55
Posted 16 February 2005 - 02:42 PM
#56
Posted 16 February 2005 - 02:51 PM
This post has been edited by warrax: 27 December 2009 - 12:52 AM
#58
Posted 16 February 2005 - 03:39 PM
This post has been edited by warrax: 27 December 2009 - 12:52 AM
#59
Posted 16 February 2005 - 04:05 PM
So ... the method I use seems to still be described HERE, called The Combination Installation. Note it is also desribed on the document I linked to in my previous post, just pretend the desired hotfix has an older UPDATE.EXE
Quote
Hope that clears things up ...
#60
Posted 16 February 2005 - 04:20 PM
Be careful with the KB885250 one it's bad for some networking types.



Help

Back to top









