MSFN Forum: Integrate or svcpack.inf? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Integrate or svcpack.inf? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Jamall 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 10-January 05

Posted 10 February 2005 - 10:41 AM

Which method of installing the hotfixes on Windows XP systems are faster?
1. The /Integrate switch?
2. By installing through svcpack.inf?
3. By installing through GUIrunone?
4. e.t.c..

The title states about using the integrating method or the svcpack.inf method but I added #3 and #4 incase someone should mention it.

But as it was said on GreenMachine's homepage, the guirunonce method was slower then svcpack.inf so i think #3 should be out of the question.

Thanx!


#2 User is offline   Astalavista 

  • MSFN loyalist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 3,338
  • Joined: 02-December 03

Posted 10 February 2005 - 10:43 AM

u can use nlite

or u can make your own script to install automcatically and silently

#3 User is offline   Jamall 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 10-January 05

Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:13 AM

Thank you Astalavista for your quick response!
Maybe if I hadn't made my question clearer I would like to add this to my question.

I would like to know which method is faster in installing WindowsXP in the total time that it takes to install itself.
Thanx again! :lol:

#4 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:18 AM

I think using the /integrate: feature on the hotfixes will give the fastest results for the installation time matter...

#5 User is offline   Jamall 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 10-January 05

Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:39 AM

:lol: THANX! :lol:

#6 User is offline   Bâshrat the Sneaky 

  • aka Wim Leers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,214
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:55 AM

Incroyable HULK, on Feb 10 2005, 06:18 PM, said:

I think using the /integrate: feature on the hotfixes will give the fastest results for the installation time matter...

Indeed... Because then no installers will have to be executed to apply the hotfixes, they become part of the regular installation!

#7 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:27 PM

Bâshrat the Sneaky, on Feb 10 2005, 11:55 AM, said:

Incroyable HULK, on Feb 10 2005, 06:18 PM, said:

I think using the /integrate: feature on the hotfixes will give the fastest results for the installation time matter...

Indeed... Because then no installers will have to be executed to apply the hotfixes, they become part of the regular installation!

but doesn't using the /integrate also add entries to SVCPACK.INF so that the hotfix runs during setup and applies the registry entries. The /integrate jsut updates the source files as well incase a file gets deleted and is restored from CD.

Fastest is probally RyanVM's driver pack as no EXE is ever executed at all.

#8 User is offline   eirogge 

  • www.eirogge.de
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 07-February 04

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:39 PM

i guess most people dont realize that the /integrate on hotfixes is nothing else than an automation of the SVCPACK.inf method. no files are replaced when using, it just creates the file and folderstructure and copies the kb******.exe file to svcpack folder.

the hotfixes are called at T13, you can verify this very easily using shift+f10 and the tasklist command.

#9 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:42 PM

Quote

no files are replaced when using

Some are. Not many.

#10 User is offline   eirogge 

  • www.eirogge.de
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 07-February 04

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:46 PM

are there any techdocs from MS on this?

#11 User is offline   Bâshrat the Sneaky 

  • aka Wim Leers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,214
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:57 PM

Alanoll, on Feb 10 2005, 08:27 PM, said:

Fastest is probally RyanVM's driver pack as no EXE is ever executed at all.

Of course! Without a doubt!

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy