RetroOS, on Jun 3 2009, 05:08 AM, said:
technoid, on Jun 1 2009, 09:45 PM, said:
Can you explain or list what these core ME features are that 'we don't want'? I had a friend who used ME without any problems nor complaints several years ago (~2002-2003). Btw, 98SE2ME works great for me (updated with Auto-patcher first and also RP9 and KernelX) on my Pentium III 1.0ghz box.
Two such core features, System Restore and System File Protection, were in their infancy, did not work very well, and were too much of an overhead.
Successful, stable operation of Windows Me, is possible by disabling (not so easy) these 'features' and applying all updates.
Yes, some people have had a good run with Windows Me as is, but generally it was not as reliable out-of-the-box.
Actually it is very easy to remove System Restore and System File Protection from Windows ME with Oppcomme which you can still grab on the wayback machine :
http://web.archive.org/web/20060829073935/...es/oppcomme.exe
http://web.archive.org/web/20060829073935/...om/oppcomme.htm
If you choose not to remove that, you need some Microsoft hotfixe (KB290700) to have System Restore to work correctly (perhaps) on ME as otherwise it won't work with any restore point made after September 8 2001.
This post has been edited by eidenk: 04 June 2009 - 10:20 PM



Help



Back to top









