un4given1, on May 26 2005, 10:19 PM, said:
There's no question that things will change before launch... but what I have to say is that if Sony has that extra 6 months to launch and does not top the XBox then that will just be a shame. Only time will tell.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm sure they will change bit, but I am not sure that's the point. i agree that, with 6 months extra lead time Sony *should* have a more powerful system than Microsoft. As mentioned above I think it's clear that PS3 *does* have some advantages, but also that XBox 360 has some as well. Some of PS3's announced features are, I think, nonsensical. The inclusion of a router, for example, is simply a "look, we even have the kitchen sink!" feature that has little or nothing to do with helping developers be more innovative or productive with their games. It's a fluff feature. I also think that 6 USB ports are overkill. As it stands, we never got much use out of the TWO USB ports on PS2, and the firewire port, much touted by Sony at the launch, was to my knowledge *never* used by *any* peripheral.
Again, I'm sure that both will have the "hardcore" fans who will buy exclusively their consoles. Personally, I think those people are rather foolish, limiting themselves in such a way. The fact is that every single one of the current gen systems (and previous gen, and the gen before that) and therefore reasonably the *next* gen systems will have games and gameplay experiences that can *only* be found on their systems. As a gamer, I enjoy *games*, and while I'm enthused and excited by the hardware, and annoyed by misleading pomp, hype and advertising, I fully expect that I will end up owning all three of the new systems. Whether I will get *any* of them at launch depends solely on the launch lineup. To date, the only two systems I've ever seen launch with "must have" games were Dreamcast and XBox. I didn't get a *good* PS2 game until a *year* after the system launched (Metal Gear Solid 2 and Final Fantasy X), and by that time the system had dropped by, if I recall, $100 or some such number.
Anyway, so far we have surely not seen anyone announce an *underpowered* machine, so there's not a great deal of reason to complain just yet. THe fact that none of the systems has even *launched* yet should be enough to tell any reasonable person that declaring a "winner" and "loser" at this stage is the realm of abject stupidity alone.
Jason