MSFN Forum: Multiboot WinXP 64-Bits & 2003 Server SP1 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Multiboot WinXP 64-Bits & 2003 Server SP1 Official thread for finding solutions Rate Topic: -----

#91 User is offline   evilvoice 

  • Ditchy McAbandonpants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:11 AM

no, i mean overwrite mode or insert more...using hexeditors, there are 2 methods for adding...in insert if it says i386, you put the cursor on the i and type 3, it says 3i386...in overwrite mode it says 3386.


#92 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:16 AM

Oh, I am always using EasyBoot to replace... so simple!

#93 User is offline   evilvoice 

  • Ditchy McAbandonpants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:20 AM

hmmm, i trust your instincts...but I would use a hex editor to do this...if it were me...there are free ones out there that work wonders...hhdsoftware has a great one that I use...never caused problems...I just dont see how some combos work and others dont...especially if your keeping the same characters and only 4 of them...just seems weird to me.

#94 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:23 AM

Well, I've been using this method for almost a year now... never had any problem. The reason why only thoses 2 combination works is because they don't break the CRC check as mentionned by TheTruth...

#95 User is offline   evilvoice 

  • Ditchy McAbandonpants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:39 AM

oh wow, TheTruth is here too...well HELLO TheTruth ltns.

#96 User is offline   Jito463 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 442
  • Joined: 01-July 04

Posted 07 August 2005 - 09:33 PM

@Hulk
Did you test this with XP Pro x64 or with Server 2k3 SP1? I ask because I tried various combinations (including those two you said were the only ones you got to work) and still got the ntldr is corrupt message. I may need to try copying the AMD64 directory to the root of the drive. Have to wait and see.

#97 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 08 August 2005 - 06:02 AM

Only with Windows 2003 Server SP1...

#98 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 08 August 2005 - 01:56 PM

I ran my tests using WinPE, trying to make a multi-boot CD with the following:

WinPE x86
WinPE x64
BartPE w\ XPE x86

I used the only two allowed renamed folders of i683 and 83i6 for the x86 versions. Both of these worked great, no problems at all.

On the x64 version however, I renamed AMD64 to DMA64 and I didn't see the corupt NTLDR error message (which in and of itself looks promising). But I did get this error message on boot:

"The entry "ntoskrnl.exe" in the [SourceDisksFiles] section of the INF file is corrupt or missing.

Setup cannot continue. Press any key to exit."

I tried editing the txtsetup.sif file in the dma64 folder, changing the "\amd64" entries under the [SourceDisksNames.amd64] section to "\dma64". But that didn't work.

#99 User is offline   N30M0D 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 23-January 05

Posted 08 August 2005 - 06:17 PM

for win 2003 sp1 should i replace 7 occurences (five i386 and two I386) or only i386 occurences?

This post has been edited by N30M0D: 08 August 2005 - 06:18 PM


#100 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 08 August 2005 - 06:47 PM

N30M0D, on Aug 8 2005, 06:17 PM, said:

for win 2003 sp1 should i replace 7 occurences (five i386 and two I386) or only i386 occurences?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I replaced all 7, if it was a lowercase "i", then I replaced it with LC, and if it was uppercase, I replaced it with UC. Didn't test if it was really required or not.

#101 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 08 August 2005 - 08:34 PM

Jazkal, on Aug 8 2005, 06:47 PM, said:

N30M0D, on Aug 8 2005, 06:17 PM, said:

for win 2003 sp1 should i replace 7 occurences (five i386 and two I386) or only i386 occurences?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I replaced all 7, if it was a lowercase "i", then I replaced it with LC, and if it was uppercase, I replaced it with UC. Didn't test if it was really required or not.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Same thing for me...

#102 User is offline   TheTruth 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 10 August 2005 - 11:10 AM

Hello Guys,

@Incroyable HULK
Thanks :thumbup

@evilvoice
Hello friend :hello: , missing you.

@Jazkal
Try to reverse the last 3 chars of AMD64 not the firsr ones, and let me know about your results as I'm unable to test.

Anyway, I'll keep an eye on this thread looking for a better solution form a smarter one.

Best regards,
TheTruth
http://www.geocities.com/pierremounir/

#103 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 10 August 2005 - 11:31 AM

TheTruth, on Aug 10 2005, 11:10 AM, said:

@Jazkal
Try to  reverse the last 3 chars of AMD64 not the firsr ones, and let me know about your results as I'm unable to test.

Tried that, didn't work. Same results.

#104 User is offline   TheTruth 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 10 August 2005 - 11:39 AM

@Jazkal
What about reversing 4 chars.

Also, make sure you don't replace "Architecture" entry in txtsetup.sif
I mean replace all ocurrences except in "Architecture" and "Drivers Cache" if exist.

This post has been edited by TheTruth: 10 August 2005 - 11:44 AM


#105 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 10 August 2005 - 12:08 PM

changing the entries in txtsetup.sif, didn't seem to matter at all.

When I tried the 4-swap to 6dma4, I recieved the old:

"NTLDR is corupt. The system cannot boot."

#106 User is offline   TheTruth 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 10 August 2005 - 12:22 PM

Oh, bad :no: . Anyway, we're sure that reversing 3 consecutive chars is the right rule.
Are you sure you won't get the error msg of ntkrnlos.exe if you don't make any changes?

anyhow, just let's wait.

#107 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 10 August 2005 - 12:52 PM

TheTruth, on Aug 10 2005, 12:22 PM, said:

Are you sure you won't get the error msg of ntkrnlos.exe if you don't make any changes?

Yes, I tested it with and without the changes in the txtsetup.sif file, with the same results.

I have a nice stack of coasters. :blink:

I sure wish vmware would come out with a version that supported x64 clients

#108 User is offline   TheTruth 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 10 August 2005 - 01:00 PM

Okay man, that's enough for today.
Thanks for your time.

TheTruth

#109 User is offline   Jito463 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 442
  • Joined: 01-July 04

Posted 11 August 2005 - 08:19 PM

You can still test with VMWare, because if it gets to a point where it loads ntldr it will just say that your hardware doesn't support this OS. Otherwise it just gives the current message we're all getting.

#110 User is offline   Ausmith1 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 11-October 03

Posted 25 August 2005 - 06:16 PM

The VMware v5.5 beta allows for 64 bit VM clients.

Share this topic:


  • 9 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy