what's the diff between 3700 sandiego E4 and E5
#1
Posted 06 August 2005 - 08:37 AM
aj
#2
Posted 06 August 2005 - 10:07 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_64
#3
Posted 06 August 2005 - 10:40 AM
"AMD Athlon 64 3700+ Processor $269.99 - July 29, 2005
Monarch Computer has the AMD Athlon 64 3700+ Processor Socket 939 (Latest Rev E - San Diego Core) OEM CPU only for only $299 - $39 off Coupon: 1PH7-O7PZF8 = $260. No fan. Free shipping, tax in GA. $340+ elsewhere. "
I ordered one from newegg and got an E4 revision and was curious what the difference was.
#4
Posted 06 August 2005 - 03:54 PM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?...N82E16819103539
Is this the one u bought?
But like i said earlier... I haven't heard anything about the E5 revision... I'll keep looking for anything on a E5 revision, but it doesn't look good 2 me...
#5
Posted 06 August 2005 - 03:58 PM
revision e (latest) are 90nm san diego and venice, rev d are the winchesters, etc.
#6
Posted 06 August 2005 - 04:12 PM
Winchester (90 nm SOI) CPU-Stepping: D0 L1-Cache: 64 + 64 KB (Data + Instructions) L2-Cache: 512 KB, fullspeed MMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX Bit Socket 939, HyperTransport (1000 MHz, HT1000) VCore: 1.40 V Power Consumption (TDP): 67 Watt max First Release: 2004 Clockrate: 1800 - 2200 MHz [edit] Venice (90 nm SOI) CPU-Stepping: E3 L1-Cache: 64 + 64 KB (Data + Instructions) L2-Cache: 512 KB, fullspeed MMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX Bit Socket 939, HyperTransport (1000 MHz, HT1000) VCore: 1.35 V or 1.40 V Power Consumption (TDP): 67 Watt max First Release: April 4, 2005 Clockrate: 1800 - 2400 MHz [edit] San Diego (90 nm SOI) CPU-Stepping: E4 L1-Cache: 64 + 64 KB (Data + Instructions) L2-Cache: 1024 KB, fullspeed MMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, NX Bit Socket 939, HyperTransport (1000 MHz, HT1000) VCore: 1.35 V or 1.40 V Power Consumption (TDP): 67 Watt max First Release: April 15, 2005 Clockrate: 2200 - 2800 MHz
Since u r a little drunker now than u were b4... i'll help u out a little.. look at the code above.... then look at the CPU-Stepping.... The CPU-Stepping is what he wants to know about... but i have never heard of a E5 revision and at that i don't think AMD would still call the revision San Diego due to that it may cause confusion 4 people...
#7
Posted 06 August 2005 - 08:19 PM
the wonders of beer...
#8
Posted 06 August 2005 - 08:39 PM
no problem dude... i know how it is... i don't drink beer.. but i have... well... tequilla, and some other stuff.. but i never ended up s***faced... lol... but anyways... u have 2 x64bit processors? y? or do u just like upgrading all the time?
One more thing Porn Loader, have u heard about a E5 revision in the CPU-Stepping?
This post has been edited by lostincyberspace2007: 06 August 2005 - 08:40 PM
#9
Posted 06 August 2005 - 09:12 PM
This post has been edited by ripken204: 06 August 2005 - 09:14 PM
#10
Posted 06 August 2005 - 09:24 PM
#11
Posted 06 August 2005 - 10:00 PM
lostincyberspace2007, on Aug 6 2005, 09:39 PM, said:
One more thing Porn Loader, have u heard about a E5 revision in the CPU-Stepping?
yea, bought my clawhammer 3200 at release (nov 03), now im running a 4000+, REALLY wanted one of the toledo cores, but the 4400 wasnt enough of a bump in speed (imo), and the 4800 was 2x the cost of my 4000+. starting to regret it tho, nvidia is taliking about utilizing the dual cores in there drivers...
as for upgrading to often.. the 3200 cost me ~$425 at release, the prior 6-8 months i went thru about 6 2500 bartons plus at least 5 mobos. add that up and the $425 i paid for 18months i used the 3200 look nice and cheap.
rip thanks for the info on the turion/mobiles, havent looked at amd for mobiles at all yet...
This post has been edited by Porn Loader: 06 August 2005 - 10:01 PM
#12
Posted 06 August 2005 - 10:36 PM
#13
Posted 07 August 2005 - 01:49 PM
as for the x2's i was seriously leaning towards that route.. but considering that i was on a 2ghz 1meg L2 chip, and that i'd have to drop $700+ for a x2 4400 that was at 2.2 just wasnt worth the $$ for the 200mhz bump for performance now. my rig gets used 95% for gaming, the rest is just surfing porn



Help

Back to top









