MSFN Forum: Fat32 -vs- Ntfs - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Hard Drive and Removable Media issues Rules

If you have questions about Seagate 7200.11, do read the READ_ME_FIRST, then read the FGA. If your questions remain unanswered after reading those two stickies, then post. For all other Hard Drive and Removable Media issues, you may post right away.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fat32 -vs- Ntfs Which performs better? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   El Barto 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: 03-January 03

Posted 20 February 2003 - 05:36 PM

I was wondering...is there a difference in performance when it comes to FAT32 and NTFS?


#2 User is offline   gamehead200 

  • SEARCH!!! SEARCH!!!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 7,036
  • Joined: 02-September 02
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 20 February 2003 - 05:39 PM

NTFS has more encryption...

#3 User is offline   Snoop 

  • BACON 'N' EGGS
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 428
  • Joined: 19-August 01

Posted 20 February 2003 - 05:56 PM

NTFS perfromance doesnt start to degrade on large hardrives like FAT32 does i think?

#4 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 20 February 2003 - 06:19 PM

yep, NTFS performs best on hard disks over 30gb

Also, more info on NTFS can be found at www.ntfs.com

#5 User is offline   XPerties 

  • MSFN OG Senior
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,994
  • Joined: 18-August 01
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 20 February 2003 - 06:20 PM

all the info you need to know...

FAT vs NTFS

#6 User is offline   Devil_666 

  • Da MSFN Baby wiv gr8 knowledge!
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 205
  • Joined: 18-August 01

Posted 20 February 2003 - 06:46 PM

Basicly NTFS is for NT, 2000 and XP because this is more secure because of the logins and encriptions, and FAT32 and 16, is for Windows 9x and XP

#7 User is offline   Doggie 

  • I'm very inactive :(
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,676
  • Joined: 13-October 02

Posted 20 February 2003 - 06:53 PM

quite simply, FAT is faster but s**tty encryption and NTFS maybe be slower but high encryption and much more reliable.. as i use NTFS myself :)

#8 User is offline   HybridMonolith 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 11-February 03

Posted 17 April 2003 - 09:27 AM

The (Very Little) speed difference between the 2 is not anything in the way of impact of system performance, NTFS is way more stable and Fragmation is minimal. :)

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy