I hav intel 915GAV orig Intel Boxed M/B
No Ext PCI x16 card
so naturally GMA900 is the Graphics Card
Painkiller says "ERR:Could not initialize DirectX 9 Renderer "
Why ?
Page 1 of 1
PainKiller is reall a Pain :-) Why doesnt it work
#2
Posted 26 August 2005 - 04:28 AM
Because it isn't DX9-compatible.
It doesn't have hardware support for DX9.
Though, I play PainKiller on my old GF4 4200 card and it doesn't complain...
That is strange...
It doesn't have hardware support for DX9.
Though, I play PainKiller on my old GF4 4200 card and it doesn't complain...
That is strange...
#3
Posted 26 August 2005 - 08:45 AM
is dx9.0c installed ?
if yes, try increasing vram...
if yes, try increasing vram...
#4
Posted 26 August 2005 - 12:59 PM
Ya i hav XP MCE 05 with all updates
intel says it is DirectX 9c complaint
and DxDiag shows DDK version 9
i hav 1GB ram and 256 MB of it is shared for the graphics card
my frnd hav a Intel Extreme2 onboard Graphics --same err
another with nVdia GForce MX 400 --No err
so isn't about "onboard " graphics ?
intel says it is DirectX 9c complaint
and DxDiag shows DDK version 9
i hav 1GB ram and 256 MB of it is shared for the graphics card
my frnd hav a Intel Extreme2 onboard Graphics --same err
another with nVdia GForce MX 400 --No err
so isn't about "onboard " graphics ?
#5
Posted 27 August 2005 - 09:25 PM
well - possibly not ALL on-board graphic chipsets, but the "Intel Extreme 2" (and 3 too i guess) is notorious for not being able to play the vast majority of DX9 dependant games (and even older DX 8 compliant ones).
In short - unless the onboard graphics chipset is based on something like a nvidia or ati style, i.e. where that are specifically for games (nvidia MX 400 onboard - old one but show my point here) then they arent gonna be any good for any sort of standard gaming - unless you're playing real old games
Hope that makes sense.
Best bet if you dont have any/much money is to try and get a budget-style graphics card that is Directx 9 compliant
Regards & HTH,
Nath.
In short - unless the onboard graphics chipset is based on something like a nvidia or ati style, i.e. where that are specifically for games (nvidia MX 400 onboard - old one but show my point here) then they arent gonna be any good for any sort of standard gaming - unless you're playing real old games
Hope that makes sense.
Best bet if you dont have any/much money is to try and get a budget-style graphics card that is Directx 9 compliant
Regards & HTH,
Nath.
#6
Posted 02 September 2005 - 01:55 AM
i hav a PCIe x16 slot in m/b
which will be thebest cost effective PCIe card to buy ==> to get max juice out of min $$
which will be thebest cost effective PCIe card to buy ==> to get max juice out of min $$
#7
Posted 02 September 2005 - 05:05 AM
im not sure about the costs,
but the nvidia 6600gt is one of the best bang-for-the-buck cards right now...
i wouldve recommended a radeon 9600xt or a 9800pro, but they dont make em in pcie slots...
best bet would if youre an ati fan would be a x600...x300 is s***...
but the nvidia 6600gt is one of the best bang-for-the-buck cards right now...
i wouldve recommended a radeon 9600xt or a 9800pro, but they dont make em in pcie slots...
best bet would if youre an ati fan would be a x600...x300 is s***...
#8
Posted 07 September 2005 - 10:38 AM
Innocent - take a look at this:
http://shop.ati.com/....asp?dept_id=39
RADEON® X800 PRO PCIE 256MB - REFURB with 3yr Warranty
That sounds really good to me lol
Cheers
N.
http://shop.ati.com/....asp?dept_id=39
RADEON® X800 PRO PCIE 256MB - REFURB with 3yr Warranty
That sounds really good to me lol
Cheers
N.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1



Help

Back to top








