MSFN Forum: PainKiller is reall a Pain :-) - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

PainKiller is reall a Pain :-) Why doesnt it work Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Innocent Devil 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 632
  • Joined: 04-February 05

Posted 25 August 2005 - 02:02 AM

I hav intel 915GAV orig Intel Boxed M/B
No Ext PCI x16 card
so naturally GMA900 is the Graphics Card

Painkiller says "ERR:Could not initialize DirectX 9 Renderer "

Why ?


#2 User is offline   -= Mancubus =- 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 01-July 04

Posted 26 August 2005 - 04:28 AM

Because it isn't DX9-compatible.
It doesn't have hardware support for DX9.

Though, I play PainKiller on my old GF4 4200 card and it doesn't complain...

That is strange...

#3 User is offline   cyanide 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 02-August 05

Posted 26 August 2005 - 08:45 AM

is dx9.0c installed ?
if yes, try increasing vram...

#4 User is offline   Innocent Devil 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 632
  • Joined: 04-February 05

Posted 26 August 2005 - 12:59 PM

Ya i hav XP MCE 05 with all updates
intel says it is DirectX 9c complaint
and DxDiag shows DDK version 9
i hav 1GB ram and 256 MB of it is shared for the graphics card

my frnd hav a Intel Extreme2 onboard Graphics --same err
another with nVdia GForce MX 400 --No err

so isn't about "onboard " graphics ?

#5 User is offline   tarquel 

  • The Well-wisher
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 03-March 04

Posted 27 August 2005 - 09:25 PM

well - possibly not ALL on-board graphic chipsets, but the "Intel Extreme 2" (and 3 too i guess) is notorious for not being able to play the vast majority of DX9 dependant games (and even older DX 8 compliant ones).

In short - unless the onboard graphics chipset is based on something like a nvidia or ati style, i.e. where that are specifically for games (nvidia MX 400 onboard - old one but show my point here) then they arent gonna be any good for any sort of standard gaming - unless you're playing real old games ;)

Hope that makes sense.

Best bet if you dont have any/much money is to try and get a budget-style graphics card that is Directx 9 compliant :)

Regards & HTH,
Nath.

#6 User is offline   Innocent Devil 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 632
  • Joined: 04-February 05

Posted 02 September 2005 - 01:55 AM

i hav a PCIe x16 slot in m/b
which will be thebest cost effective PCIe card to buy ==> to get max juice out of min $$

#7 User is offline   cyanide 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 02-August 05

Posted 02 September 2005 - 05:05 AM

im not sure about the costs,
but the nvidia 6600gt is one of the best bang-for-the-buck cards right now...
i wouldve recommended a radeon 9600xt or a 9800pro, but they dont make em in pcie slots...
best bet would if youre an ati fan would be a x600...x300 is s***...

#8 User is offline   tarquel 

  • The Well-wisher
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 03-March 04

Posted 07 September 2005 - 10:38 AM

Innocent - take a look at this:

http://shop.ati.com/....asp?dept_id=39

RADEON® X800 PRO PCIE 256MB - REFURB with 3yr Warranty

That sounds really good to me lol

Cheers
N.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy