I)Install XPE in another primary partition than C: is always better than in the same partition by enjoying a lot of of benefits following:
1) Stay in one windows, you could ghost or restore the other one’s( even with Norton Ghost 90 ) too easily, you are no need of rebooting to work in WinPE environtment.
2) Go to Windows 2000 in the D partition , you could see J partition ( hidden of XPE ) and you could update all changes of a new XPE.iso( from F: to the old in J: ) easily and speedily, And you are no need of buying any CDRW to test XPE.iso.
3) Working within J partition ( or X: if it is are active partition unhidden ), you could edit nu2menu.xml or any programs easily because of a written hard disk not read only like CD .
4) The booting time in hard disk is so much speedier than ever: 1 minute 30 secondes ( compared with 4 minutes 30 secondes in CD or 10 minutes in USB flash Drive ).

5) You could read my ways to install XPE in another primary partition than C and create MS-DOS in my former topic:
http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=53599
Don’t try to test peinstall plugin of Bart’s if your aren't an expert. You have the big risk to erase all upur precious data in C partition if you mistyped some lines.
6) You could get rid off 2 plugins in XPE: dospe ( waste of time to find a lot of files but it seems useless because of not a real DOS ) and peinstall ( too risky ) .
II) Why not installing XPE in the same partition C: Big reasons are the following:
1) You will have a bigger partition C with 2 installing( XPE and XP ) and when your are need of saving C partition with ghost , it becomes so big ( usually over 1.5GB in size )
2)While working with XPE, although it also boots speedily ( 1 minute 30 secondes) but the real tetchy problem is C partition reserved for XP is incorporated together with XPE in their common X: partition ( by character of XPSP2 ).
3) Sometimes in update the new programs for XPE, you would get mixed between Programs ( XPE ) and Program Files (XP) and Documents and settings .
III) Why not installing XPE in USB Flash Disk: The main reasons are the following:
1)The booting time to USB Flash Drive is so long over 10 minutes ( compared with 1 minute 30 secondes in hard disk .
2) You are always a real need of a bigger Flash Disk: over 526MB or 1GB. If not, you could install a miniPE or microPE in USB flash Drive.
3) The copy time of all files to USB flash Drive is also long with Fafot’s way( 100 o/o success ): 10 minutes .
4)If you use pe2-usb.cmd , you will get the usual bug is not finding ntldlr or boot.ini during the processof making pe-usb. That is not easy to override this problem.
IV) Reduce the making all autoboot XPE CD or DVD by this way :
1) If you already install XPE to another partition than C, you could reduce making XPE CD in minimum. So that , it is not wasting a lot of money to buy any CDRW disk in the future.
2) The booting time to XPE in CD is longer than in hard disk ( usually 4 minutes 30 secondes or more ) compared with 1 minute 30 secodes in hard disk ).
3)Testing the boot time is much easier, speedier in hard disk than CD ( no required of testing with Vnware or Virtual CD anymore )
V) Conclusion:
After reading my topic I hop you would choose the best solution for you in installing XPE. Could you disagree with me, but how you are not wasting a lot of money to buy CDRW anymore? : That is the principal or really convenient way for all of us..
D Hoang from Vietnam
This post has been edited by DrHoang: 27 August 2005 - 09:27 PM



Help
Back to top










