MSFN Forum: Download Manager: Flashget vs ? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Download Manager: Flashget vs ? Rate Topic: -----

Poll: Do you use Flashget or something else? (37 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you use Flashget or something else?

  1. Flashget (10 votes [37.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.04%

  2. Other (17 votes [62.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.96%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   matthewk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 07-June 05

  Posted 31 August 2005 - 03:24 PM

I know Flashget is commercial, but I like it alot. I know there are some free ones out there. I'm interested in what the members here use, and I'm interested in what you feel might be advantages/disadvantages of your choice when compared to say Flashget or other popular one(s). Thanks :)


#2 User is offline   mrnxdmx 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 17-November 04

Posted 31 August 2005 - 03:36 PM

yea, im using flashget for over 3 years, and iits eating my internet resources :D, so i think its the fastest one, i like its options, its jets, and its simple of course, thats making it best. when u use it with hacks like 100max downloads with 30splits per one download, there is no program that will reach it :)

#3 User is offline   albator 

  • Nlite Supporter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 637
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 31 August 2005 - 04:59 PM

matthewk, on Aug 31 2005, 03:24 PM, said:

I know Flashget is commercial, but I like it alot. I know there are some free ones out there. I'm interested in what the members here use, and I'm interested in what you feel might be advantages/disadvantages of your choice when compared to say Flashget or other popular one(s).  Thanks :)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Leachget for a freeware is pretty good, it also support custom referer.


@mrnxdmx
Does having more than 5 threads while downloading really increase the speeds ?

#4 User is offline   matthewk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 31 August 2005 - 08:17 PM

albator, on Aug 31 2005, 04:59 PM, said:

@mrnxdmx
Does having more than 5 threads while downloading really increase the speeds ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It has never been sensible for me to do more than 2 or 3 connections. Generally, 1 or 2 connections is good enough to get the max out of the host or your connection. In one case, a host was max'ing out a single connection at 10kb/s; so, I opened 10 connections getting around ~100kb/sec. This is the only case where I have seen such, but without a program like flashget I could not have got the files at the speed I did.

#5 User is offline   Wesmosis 

  • Just Call Me Doctor Just Call Me Pain!
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 787
  • Joined: 20-September 04

Posted 01 September 2005 - 12:49 PM

IDM rules!
can take the wmv, mov files from browser like no other dowbload manager can do!
it has a very powerful ADVANCED INTEGRATION
Internet Download Manager v4.06

#6 User is offline   mrnxdmx 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 17-November 04

Posted 01 September 2005 - 02:15 PM

albator, on Sep 1 2005, 12:59 AM, said:

Does having more than 5 threads while downloading really increase the speeds ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

At a normal dsl connection, normally not, but when i'm at university, (has a great connection, think about 19000kbps) using more than 5 threads is really increasing speed.

#7 User is offline   albator 

  • Nlite Supporter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 637
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 01 September 2005 - 02:22 PM

mrnxdmx, on Sep 1 2005, 02:15 PM, said:

albator, on Sep 1 2005, 12:59 AM, said:

Does having more than 5 threads while downloading really increase the speeds ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

At a normal dsl connection, normally not, but when i'm at university, (has a great connection, think about 19000kbps) using more than 5 threads is really increasing speed.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Ok, I understand :thumbup

#8 User is offline   matthewk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 01 September 2005 - 06:40 PM

mrnxdmx, on Sep 1 2005, 02:15 PM, said:

albator, on Sep 1 2005, 12:59 AM, said:

Does having more than 5 threads while downloading really increase the speeds ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

At a normal dsl connection, normally not, but when i'm at university, (has a great connection, think about 19000kbps) using more than 5 threads is really increasing speed.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This is not a logical reply. I'm not sure if the example provided in my post makes sense or not. Basically, it is not safe to say that the amount of connections one is able to use for benefit is based solely on his/her own internet connection. If your dsl will max out at 250kb/sec and the download is going at 50kb/sec, then it is logical to increase the amount of connections. If you increase the amount of connections and do not notice a change, then you could remove the newly added connection due to it not being a benefit to the overall transfer rate. If are at a university and you are able to get 500kb/sec+ downloading, then do not expect to get this from most hosts. Unfortunately, not every host has as much or wants to allow as much upload bandwidth to a single user.

#9 User is offline   Claude 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 19-July 05

Posted 01 September 2005 - 07:13 PM

I use leechget, nice and easy, plus the free edition doesnt have those evil popups that flashget has

#10 User is offline   techniquefreak 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 152
  • Joined: 17-June 05

Posted 02 September 2005 - 01:32 AM

Metaproducts Download Express gets my vote for sure. It's free, small and works well for me. And - important as well - has no ads or spyware.
Furthermore, I hate browser integration and clipboard monitoring - these things are easy to turn off in Download Express :)

Greetings

- Jacob

This post has been edited by techniquefreak: 02 September 2005 - 01:35 AM


#11 User is offline   ekerazha 

  • Deus ex machina
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 16-October 04

Posted 02 September 2005 - 02:02 AM

I use Free Download Manager (FDM) http://www.freedownloadmanager.org it is pretty nice ;)

#12 User is offline   indianarchie 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 280
  • Joined: 22-July 04

Posted 05 September 2005 - 01:52 AM

How come no one says 'Download Accelerator plus'? Is it a bad one?

#13 User is offline   matthewk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 05 September 2005 - 09:16 AM

indianarchie, on Sep 5 2005, 01:52 AM, said:

How come no one says 'Download Accelerator plus'? Is it a bad one?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I used DAP for many years. Flashget was the transition I made after it. I read it was 300% faster; that is probably of course a little exaggeration for advertisement, but I have noticed it is a little more efficient.

I remember GetRight having a feature to download say image01-image99.jpg very easily or any sequential filenames; I always wanted this in flashget.

#14 User is offline   fima 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 06-September 05

Posted 06 September 2005 - 11:24 AM

Advanced LAN Pump

Download link: http://www.softsolo.com/files/alp.zip

I know this utility is for LANs only, but it greatly helps me when i copying large files over Windows network.

#15 User is offline   n7Epsilon 

  • Currently Learning: C#, JavaScript, PHP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: 11-February 05

Posted 06 September 2005 - 11:47 AM

Free Download Manager
(http://www.freedownloadmanager.org/)

Combines features of ReGet and GetRight and is absolutely free (not to mention very small and light on resources)

This post has been edited by ChipCraze23: 06 September 2005 - 11:49 AM


#16 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 25 September 2005 - 01:37 AM

matthewk, on Sep 5 2005, 05:16 PM, said:

I remember GetRight having a feature to download say image01-image99.jpg very easily or any sequential filenames; I always wanted this in flashget.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


flashget already has that feature for so long.
its called batch.. right click on the flashget bar and u'll see it under add new download or something...

#17 User is offline   dromer 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 28-June 05

Posted 26 September 2005 - 08:26 AM

I use Free Download Manager, it's small uses few resources and does anything I expect from a download mananger.

#18 User is offline   albator 

  • Nlite Supporter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 637
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 26 September 2005 - 12:03 PM

indianarchie, on Sep 5 2005, 01:52 AM, said:

How come no one says 'Download Accelerator plus'? Is it a bad one?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Many Spyware with this one ! That why people stay away from it,

#19 User is offline   angel0104 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 01-March 04

Posted 26 September 2005 - 12:25 PM

net transport for me!!!

#20 User is offline   Ivanov 

  • foobar2000 fan :-)
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 106
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 September 2005 - 02:13 PM

IDM is the best download manager, who I am used.
IDM can be integrated in ANY browser and download ANY file. Acclerate the download speed with minimal number of connections, not like FlashGet. Multilanguage support, easy to use interface. Batch downloading, grab all links from IE.

FlashGet work that - flood the server with more request, download less bytes.
Posted Image

IDM download more bytes and flood less the server.
Posted Image

With another words - IDM optimze better the Internet Connection.

This post has been edited by Ivanov: 30 September 2005 - 09:06 AM


Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy