iTunes 5, Localized with no quicktime...
#92
Posted 04 October 2005 - 12:56 PM
Since i'm now using Firefox, do i still need to have a million spyware and ad blockers running in the background on my machine?
I currently have AVG antivirus and firewall, spybot search & destroy, cwsshredder, super adblocker, adaware se plus, microsoft antispyware, and spyware blaster.
Just wondering.
thanks!
jeff
#93
Posted 04 October 2005 - 01:01 PM
... you could probably get away with dropping super adblocker and spyware blaster. AV and Firewall are must keeps and keeping the 'big three' - S&D, Ad-Aware and MSAnitSpyware is probably a good idea. No idea what cwsshredder is.
If you would like to continue this line of disscussion further pls feel free to PM me, and lets keep this topic on topic
#94
Posted 05 October 2005 - 10:27 AM
This post has been edited by Menedas: 05 October 2005 - 10:29 AM
#95
Posted 05 October 2005 - 11:05 AM
Menedas, on Oct 5 2005, 05:27 PM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My iTunes pack without quicktime is simply to allow people the choice of using the official QT or the alternative, as well as being only an english version.
SP
#96
Posted 05 October 2005 - 11:09 AM
This post has been edited by Menedas: 05 October 2005 - 11:10 AM
#97
Posted 05 October 2005 - 11:17 AM
Menedas, on Oct 5 2005, 06:09 PM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
An other idea is to check the quality (bitrate) settings on iTunes encoding options, and choose a lower bitrate to get smaller files.
SP
#98
Posted 05 October 2005 - 11:37 AM
seapagan, on Oct 5 2005, 06:17 PM, said:
seapagan, on Oct 5 2005, 06:17 PM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But thank you for your fast answers. I will probably go back to my old 4.6 and use iTunes 5 on a vmware system to encode with VBR for my extra high quality archive music files with 256kbps. Can't see any advantage to 4.9. And I don't like the Podcasts in my list.
This post has been edited by Menedas: 05 October 2005 - 11:51 AM
#99
Posted 05 October 2005 - 12:47 PM
#101
Posted 05 October 2005 - 02:24 PM
Personally I havn't used them either, but maybe one day. It only takes me 2 minutes to walk down the stairs, pick up a coffee and be at work so I dont think I'll be able to justify downloading podcasts for that rikgale
@Menedas:
You seem to have very specific requirements (and obviously sensitive ears - I cant tell the difference between media _properly_ encoded at 192 and that at 256 personally), so go with what does it for you. There are better converters / cd rippers around than iTunes I am sure though.
SP
#102
Posted 05 October 2005 - 02:41 PM
seapagan, on Oct 5 2005, 09:24 PM, said:
seapagan, on Oct 5 2005, 09:24 PM, said:
You seem to have very specific requirements (and obviously sensitive ears - I cant tell the difference between media _properly_ encoded at 192 and that at 256 personally), so go with what does it for you. There are better converters / cd rippers around than iTunes I am sure though.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This post has been edited by Menedas: 05 October 2005 - 02:50 PM
#103
Posted 05 October 2005 - 08:22 PM
Ver 5 (5.01 certainly) also allows AAC to be recorded in vbr. I tend to use mp3 for all my tunes, so have not experimented with aac too much, and was not aware the size of media had increased with QT7. Infact, the only reason QT is on my machine is to alllow iTunes to run - dont use it for anything else.
I need a bigger iPod too - 40Gb is just not enough
SP.
#104
Posted 12 October 2005 - 01:11 PM
iTunes 6.0 is out, care to do your thing?
Two majo version releases in just over 2 months!! Somethings going on at Apple
Hope ur well
Rik
#105
Posted 12 October 2005 - 01:16 PM
rikgale, on Oct 12 2005, 07:11 PM, said:
iTunes 6.0 is out, care to do your thing?
Two majo version releases in just over 2 months!! Somethings going on at Apple
Hope ur well
Rik
They're just doing this to annoy me!
I'll download and take a look. Not much else to do here since the weather is so bad we are just bouncing around trying to stop everything hitting the deck....
Otherwise, I'm OK, thanks
Edit : 34Mb, well, not too much bigger than the last one! Lets see what size it really needs to be!
SP
This post has been edited by seapagan: 12 October 2005 - 01:20 PM
#107
Posted 12 October 2005 - 03:16 PM
MCSE, on Oct 12 2005, 08:59 PM, said:
One thing worth noting is that this requires QT ver 7.0.3 - I'll check to see if QT Alt supports this. Got it down to roughly the same size as I had ver 5.01, still got to track down the annoying attempt to install QT and it's done.
I'll probably get it finished in a few hours when I get off shift. May throw in a localized ver of QT 7.03 a bit later as a bonus for those who dont like QT-alt
Edit : Seems that QT-Alt 1.62 (the latest I can find) only has QT 7.0.2
SP
This post has been edited by seapagan: 12 October 2005 - 03:19 PM
#108
Posted 12 October 2005 - 03:21 PM
I did just notice that a video ipod has been released, so that might explain the v6. Enjoy your shift.
#109
Posted 12 October 2005 - 03:50 PM
This post has been edited by Menedas: 12 October 2005 - 03:51 PM
#110
Posted 12 October 2005 - 06:15 PM
This may take a while
I have a version without QT7, localized for english that sits at about 7.5Mb under 7z.
Only problem is that they have been a bit more sneaky with the QT install part, and I'm having a hard time to bypass it. So, if you have QT 7.0.3 installed it will install fine, but any lesser value and you will get an error. I think the logic is buried in the compiled script file, which is a <sweary word> to get at.
Since you need the latest QT to use this, is it worth me posting this version? Maybe I'll wait until the QT-alt is updated.
@Menedas:
I am not 100% sure, but I guess the new iPod will only support the QT range of video files, apple always seems pretty propriety to me. I hope I'm wrong though! Certainly iTunes installs no codecs or support files for any other format, and I bet you will only get QT-compatible files from the iTunes online store.
And agreed - the iPod is WAY overdue for an 80Gb version!
Maybe I'll have better luck after a snooze
SP.



Help

Back to top









