MSFN Forum: October 2005 Security Updates - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

October 2005 Security Updates Rate Topic: ***** 1 Votes

#21 User is offline   Crash&Burn 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 11-March 05
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 October 2005 - 07:34 AM

@ FDV
How about this sig? I like Exroidal! heh

This post has been edited by Crash&Burn: 14 October 2005 - 07:36 AM



#22 User is offline   premi 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 04-January 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 October 2005 - 07:45 AM

and about this hotfix
KB904368

#23 User is offline   Crash&Burn 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 11-March 05
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 October 2005 - 08:03 AM

Thats already covered if you have UpdateRollup v2, instead of v1.
Read the KB article it states only applies to Update Rollup 1.
RESOLUTION:
To resolve this problem, install version 2 of Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4. To do this, visit the following Microsoft Web site:
I think some people are far too eager to patch their box ;)

This post has been edited by Crash&Burn: 14 October 2005 - 08:06 AM


#24 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 October 2005 - 02:24 PM

@dziubek - What's going on? Welcome back. Haven't seen you post in a while. Since I last heard from you, HFSLIP went under serious reconstruction. I guess I missed a few things, as you pointed out.
a. WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-PLK.exe - HFSLIP had a typo (now corrected and posted)
b. WindowsXP-KB887472-x86-SP1-PLK.exe - you are slipstreaming the incorrect version, grab the version for SP2. For english the filename is WindowsXP-KB887742-x86-ENU.exe, for you is is most likely WindowsXP-KB887742-x86-PLK.exe. Google for it and use that file instead.
c. WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-PLK.exe - This confuses me. Are you sure that your hotfix isn't corrupted? When I try your exact hotfix file, HFSLIP works. I fixed this issue a while ago. Perhaps you should re-download it and replace the one you have.
Please test the current HFSLIP and report back.

This post has been edited by tommyp: 14 October 2005 - 02:24 PM


#25 User is offline   Crash&Burn 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 11-March 05
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 October 2005 - 08:24 PM

Well I noticed this one: MS04-051
Affects everything except 2003 Server SP1

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/...n/MS05-051.mspx
KB902400

Replaces (where still applicable, mostly Win2k & XPsp1)
KB823980
KB824146
KB828741
KB873333

#26 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 15 October 2005 - 08:06 AM

View Posttommyp, on Oct 14 2005, 09:24 PM, said:

@dziubek - What's going on? Welcome back. Haven't seen you post in a while. Since I last heard from you, HFSLIP went under serious reconstruction. I guess I missed a few things, as you pointed out.
a. WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-PLK.exe - HFSLIP had a typo (now corrected and posted)
b. WindowsXP-KB887472-x86-SP1-PLK.exe - you are slipstreaming the incorrect version, grab the version for SP2. For english the filename is WindowsXP-KB887742-x86-ENU.exe, for you is is most likely WindowsXP-KB887742-x86-PLK.exe. Google for it and use that file instead.
c. WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-PLK.exe - This confuses me. Are you sure that your hotfix isn't corrupted? When I try your exact hotfix file, HFSLIP works. I fixed this issue a while ago. Perhaps you should re-download it and replace the one you have.
Please test the current HFSLIP and report back.



a) WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-PLK.exe was integrated corectly :))
b ) YES you are right,I'm slipstreaming the incorrect version,
corectly version is WindowsXP-KB887742-x86-PLK.exe
(WindowsXP-KB887472-x86-SP1-PLK.exe is old version for windows XP PL sp1 :>). BIG THANKS,You have Hawk eye :))
c)WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-PLK.exe-> I re-download this file and replaced the one I have ,but it didn't integrated with my OS :(
p.s I will sent report later,because I write this post at work.

This post has been edited by dziubek: 15 October 2005 - 08:07 AM


#27 User is offline   megablast 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 15-October 05

Posted 15 October 2005 - 02:49 PM

View Postdziubek, on Oct 15 2005, 08:06 AM, said:

c)WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-PLK.exe-> I re-download this file and replaced the one I have ,but it didn't integrated with my OS :(
p.s I will sent report later,because I write this post at work.


I do have the same problem.

I found a solution for "my" problem:

The KB89046 fix in hfslip:

IF EXIST TEMP\spru0415.dll REN TEMP\spru0415.dll xpsp3res.dll

The filename in german version is spru0407.dll, so I changed the line to this:

IF EXIST TEMP\spru04*.dll REN TEMP\spru04*.dll xpsp3res.dll

The spru04*.dll naming because according to the sp2gdr and sp2qfe infīs name should always include "04".

Maybe this works for you, too.

@tommyp
May check out other languages and add this "fix" to your GREAT hfslip.

Edit:
KB906569 uses same naming conventions as KB89046 -> KB906569 uses an updated xpsp3res.dll.
Slipstreaming here has to be checked if it works.

Adding cat of KB89046 + registry info, but using new file of KB906569.

This post has been edited by megablast: 15 October 2005 - 03:12 PM


#28 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 15 October 2005 - 05:16 PM

@megablast - Thanks! I can't test other languages... Not enough time in the day to test all of them! :). Thanks for getting to the bottom of that hotfix... should be a non-issue now. BTW, you'd be amazed how many errors I have uncovered with HFSLIP. It's freaking amazing that a company as large as m$ft has such poor configuration management. I'll update the next version... BTW, the new version will have some cool stuff.

#29 User is offline   megablast 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 15-October 05

Posted 15 October 2005 - 11:10 PM

View Posttommyp, on Oct 15 2005, 05:16 PM, said:

@megablast - Thanks! I can't test other languages... Not enough time in the day to test all of them! :). Thanks for getting to the bottom of that hotfix... should be a non-issue now. BTW, you'd be amazed how many errors I have uncovered with HFSLIP. It's freaking amazing that a company as large as m$ft has such poor configuration management. I'll update the next version... BTW, the new version will have some cool stuff.


;) No problem.

I found another problem with an update, not hotfix: KB906569 (updates msconfig and xpsp3res.dll).

Could you please take a look?

I played a bit with hfslip and could get no solution for this. It is an SP2QFE update, and hfslip deletes
SP2QFE folders and infs, to get it working I had to create an switchless installer.
I didnīt want to change the type 1 slipstreaming code.

Maybe you can find something.

Edit:
A suggestion: Playing around with this issue, I got an idea for hfslip:
While slipstreaming KBxxxxxx.exe and there is no filecopy to WORK\I386X could you may include a kind
of "debug.log" for this? So it will be easier to find those kind of errors.
The "normal" updates are not scanned by hfnetchk or mbsa and there is no guarentee that they are really integrated.
And there are many of them, as you can see here:
http://www.pc-experi...?threadid=12223

Edit2:
Um :( , this is even more worse then I thought. The following os updates, non sec, donīt get integrated when using hfslip (placed in HF folder):
885626
885884
886677
890831
884883
886716
885222
889016
893357
896626
903224
889527
907865

All these are SP2QFE type ONLY updates. There are probably more.
Some of them are not needed (if you donīt use OfficeXP, Adobe Premiere etc.), but some of them are.

This post has been edited by megablast: 16 October 2005 - 12:11 AM


#30 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 October 2005 - 05:10 AM

Yea, I knew about the QFE ones. I was told a while back that these fixes are experimental and not really official. I'll see what I can do about adding this in for the next release.

#31 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 18 October 2005 - 03:10 AM

:thumbup

Attached File(s)



#32 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 18 October 2005 - 04:37 AM

@dziubek - Thanks for posting the results. I'll have to update the script a bit for XP's directX update.

#33 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 October 2005 - 12:43 PM

View Posttommyp, on Oct 18 2005, 11:37 AM, said:

@dziubek - Thanks for posting the results. I'll have to update the script a bit for XP's directX update.

When you will plane publish new version ? :rolleyes:

dziubek

#34 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 October 2005 - 03:17 PM

I don't quite understand what HFNETCHK is saying. It's saying that quartz.dll is behind a revision, but the revision that it wants is the one that is part of your installation. Does regular windows update tell you that Q904706 is missing?

#35 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 October 2005 - 04:25 PM

View Posttommyp, on Oct 19 2005, 10:17 PM, said:

I don't quite understand what HFNETCHK is saying. It's saying that quartz.dll is behind a revision, but the revision that it wants is the one that is part of your installation. Does regular windows update tell you that Q904706 is missing?


1.When I first opened WU i must install ActiveX (1.jpg) and next KB898461, then Windows Update tell me any hotfixs isn't missing.
2. When I used "hslip-13 october" this problem didn't perform :(


dziubek

This post has been edited by dziubek: 19 October 2005 - 04:26 PM


#36 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 21 October 2005 - 06:17 PM

I used hslip-17 october but still I have problem with activex and KB898461 :(


dziubek

Attached File(s)


This post has been edited by dziubek: 21 October 2005 - 06:19 PM


#37 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 21 October 2005 - 06:58 PM

@dziubek - Good news and bad news. HFSLIP works and MSFT doesn't. HFSLIP found another the MSFT error. I think you may want to revisit microsoft and download the new hotfix for MS05-050. There was lots of troubles with this one (LINK). I took a look at the hotfix I had downloaded the other week, and compared it to the one I just re-downloaded. They silently RE-RELEASED THE HOTFIX, the original one had the wrong binaries!!!! HAHAHAHAHA Hats off to Microsoft on that one. They create their own problems. Anyway, the new file from microsoft will fix the issue you have. Delete the incorrect WindowsXP-KB904706-DX9-x86-PLK.exe and download the new one.

#38 User is offline   saugatak 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 300
  • Joined: 15-July 05

Posted 21 October 2005 - 08:11 PM

Imagine that, M$ changing a hotfix w/o telling anyone so that everyone who got the old "defective" hotfix is still stuck with it.

#39 User is offline   dziubek 

  • Friend of HFSLIP
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 26-November 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 21 October 2005 - 09:38 PM

View Posttommyp, on Oct 22 2005, 02:58 AM, said:

@dziubek - Good news and bad news. HFSLIP works and MSFT doesn't. HFSLIP found another the MSFT error. I think you may want to revisit microsoft and download the new hotfix for MS05-050. There was lots of troubles with this one (LINK). I took a look at the hotfix I had downloaded the other week, and compared it to the one I just re-downloaded. They silently RE-RELEASED THE HOTFIX, the original one had the wrong binaries!!!! HAHAHAHAHA Hats off to Microsoft on that one. They create their own problems. Anyway, the new file from microsoft will fix the issue you have. Delete the incorrect WindowsXP-KB904706-DX9-x86-PLK.exe and download the new one.


@Tommyp

I delete WindowsXP-KB904706-DX9-x86-PLK.exe and download WindowsXP-KB904706-x86-PLK.exe(1,33MB)
I used hslip-17 october but still I have problem with activex and KB898461

dziubek

Attached File(s)



#40 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 22 October 2005 - 09:29 AM

@dziubek -
a) 898461: I found something to correct with HFSLIP. I'm testing it now.
B) Activex issue: Can you please check the versions of the
windows\system32\GWFSPIDGen.dll and
windows\system32\LegitCheckControl.dll
and compare them to the revisions of the LegitCheckControl.cab (you need to expand the cab file with winzip or equivalent). If your CAB file versions are older, you need to redownload the latest LegitCheckControl.cab file.
c) Please PM me with your email address if you would like to test my latest version that I'm working on. It has a ton of changes, and maybe the issue with 898461 will be resolved. The new version is a bit different, but is improved to make the sourcess a bit smaller.

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy