MSFN Forum: .Net Framework 2.0 FINAL is OUT! - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

.Net Framework 2.0 FINAL is OUT! Rate Topic: ***-- 2 Votes

#11 User is offline   Scubar 

  • - Local Smartass -
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 829
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 27 October 2005 - 04:54 PM

thanks Zxian, im just used to seeing RyanVM come up with the switchless silent installers for things like the framework, java, hotfixes.


#12 User is offline   Zxian 

  • Scroll up - see the Google bar?
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 5,066
  • Joined: 30-September 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 27 October 2005 - 05:24 PM

View Postevilvoice, on Oct 27 2005, 03:50 PM, said:

everyone has iexpress...open run dialog and type iexpress...it comes with internet explorer.
Interesting... *evil laugh* You learn something new everyday. Thanks evilvoice! :)


View PostDigeratiPrime, on Oct 27 2005, 03:51 PM, said:

thats what i thought, ill just stick with 1.1 SP1 for a while then. :whistle:
You can stick with it for now. There will be apps released in the future that will require .NET 2.0 (Notebook Hardware Control is one of them that needs it right now).


View PostScubaSteve, on Oct 27 2005, 03:54 PM, said:

thanks Zxian, im just used to seeing RyanVM come up with the switchless silent installers for things like the framework, java, hotfixes.
Hehe... ;)

#13 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 27 October 2005 - 07:58 PM

Well...
The incompatible-with-each-other problems were supposedly only till the betas. The plan was to have 2.0 compatible with 1.1 :}
But we wouldn't know for sure till we actually see what happens.

#14 User is offline   Zxian 

  • Scroll up - see the Google bar?
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 5,066
  • Joined: 30-September 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 27 October 2005 - 09:22 PM

I haven't heard of any conflicts between the two versions. I have heard of people using only .NET 2.0 and running into problems... but then again, I'm not the be-all-and-end-all of info. :P

Anyways... I made a new installer for English only. It's a bit smaller than the full version, so for those people who need to squeeze every KB out of their UA CDs, this is for you. I've tested it myself without any errors, but as always, let me know if you find any.

.NET Framework 2.0 Silent Installer - English Only - 22.3 MB

Enjoy!

#15 User is offline   Jazkal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 592
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 27 October 2005 - 10:30 PM

hmmm

You don't need to repackage it, unless I missed something, it will install silently without rebooting with this command:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install /l /q"

Worked for my 32bit install. Haven't tested x64 yet, will get to that tomorrow.

#16 User is offline   Zxian 

  • Scroll up - see the Google bar?
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 5,066
  • Joined: 30-September 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 27 October 2005 - 10:39 PM

No you don't need to repackage it... but my silent installer is a whole 10KB smaller than the original!!! :P

Thanks for the silent switch. You might wanna post that in the Applications Installs section for other members. :)

#17 User is offline   staples 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 15-October 04

Posted 28 October 2005 - 03:03 AM

if you want to deploy it via the msi.

expand it
dotnetfx.exe /c /t:"C:\dotnet2\"

get the transform
http://www.zyard.com..._files/free.htm or http://www.zyard.com/files/dotnet2.mst

install it
msiexec /i netfx.msi TRANSFORMS=DOTNET2.MST /qb

#18 User is offline   boooggy 

  • MSFN Master
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,319
  • Joined: 27-February 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 October 2005 - 04:28 AM

thanx staples!!! :thumbup

#19 User is offline   sonu27 

  • Panjabi By Nature
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 762
  • Joined: 27-August 04

Posted 28 October 2005 - 11:48 AM

There are quite a few programs that don't work with this, only v1.1.

I hope nLite isn't one.

If it is please change it to the new version.

#20 User is offline   Incroyable HULK 

  • Slowly Turning Green...
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,256
  • Joined: 05-March 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 October 2005 - 12:40 PM

View PostZxian, on Oct 27 2005, 10:39 PM, said:

No you don't need to repackage it... but my silent installer is a whole 10KB smaller than the original!!! :P


WoW 10KB !!! ;)

#21 User is offline   Weed 

  • U got brainwashed from everyone!! but too bad, u dont kn
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 367
  • Joined: 07-November 03
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 October 2005 - 01:28 PM

i have removed 1.1 and installed 2.0
no problems here with nlite
dont have other programs to test...

This post has been edited by Weed: 28 October 2005 - 01:28 PM


#22 User is offline   sonu27 

  • Panjabi By Nature
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 762
  • Joined: 27-August 04

Posted 30 October 2005 - 07:47 AM

Thats good then.

But I removed v2. LOL

I email a person about his program not working with v2 but it works with v1.1. Could anyone tell me if the following is correct?

Quote

At 15:34 27/10/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>
>I've just installed .NET framework version 2.0, just came out
>today.
>
>And I downloaded your program. Said that you neen version 1.1 or

>higher.
>
>Please fix this issue, thanks!

Well, it's not really an issue. .NET 2.0 is not compatible with 1.1 -- they're quite fundamentally different. You will need to have .NET 1.1 installed as well. Since you can install it side-by-side with 2.0 then there shouldn't be any problems.

("1.1 or higher", incidentally, just means 1.x (but not 1.0). If they had released a 1.2 it would have worked with that. But 2.0 is an entirely different kettle of fish.)

--
Gavin Lambert, Mirality Systems
http://www.mirality.co.nz/


Thanks. The program is http://www.mirality.co.nz/maxcode.php MAX Manager.

This post has been edited by sonu27: 30 October 2005 - 07:48 AM


#23 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,174
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 09 November 2005 - 01:20 PM

Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal?

#24 User is offline   Solid as a rock 

  • So solid as a rock is
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 718
  • Joined: 30-May 04

Posted 13 November 2005 - 04:07 AM

View PostJazkal, on Oct 28 2005, 05:30 AM, said:

hmmm

You don't need to repackage it, unless I missed something, it will install silently without rebooting with this command:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install /l /q"

Worked for my 32bit install. Haven't tested x64 yet, will get to that tomorrow.

so i need to download the redistable framework 2.0 and install it with your switches and there will be no problems? (as if hotfix and SP packs and tweaks?)

i also read some thing about conflicting 1.1 and 2.0 when installed after each other at one moment? could someone tell me more?

also, i have a problem with my slipstreamed framework 1.1, could someone help me with that? http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...71&#entry419571

#25 User is offline   JASpurrier3 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 03-May 05

Posted 13 November 2005 - 05:17 PM

This is for people with slow internet connections or people who do not want to worry about faulty installers. This is a Patch to change the original DOTNETFX.exe (v2.0) to a silent install suitable for Unattended Windows Installations. All it changes is the command executed to install .NET Framework. It does not even mess with the microsoft digital signature. Enjoy!

Attached File(s)



#26 User is offline   favorini 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 24-October 03

Posted 22 November 2005 - 06:32 PM

Passing the /l argument to install.exe will create a verbose MSI log file in %TEMP%.
If you want to put the log file somewhere else, you can use this:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l X:\logdir\dotnet.log"


If the path to your log file has a space, use this:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l ""X:\dir with space\dotnet.log"""


#27 User is offline   MastaVR6 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: 15-April 04

Posted 21 February 2006 - 06:18 PM

View PostTomcat76, on Nov 9 2005, 01:20 PM, said:

Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal?


I'm also slave to the missing icons in the admintools folder, what gives? -Answer : The SDK is required for viewing the security via a GUI.

See this link http://msdn2.microso...y/2bc0cxhc.aspx

This post has been edited by MastaVR6: 22 February 2006 - 01:18 PM


#28 User is offline   Kiki Burgh 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,426
  • Joined: 06-January 06

Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:00 AM

View PostZxian, on Oct 28 2005, 11:22 AM, said:

I haven't heard of any conflicts between the two versions. I have heard of people using only .NET 2.0 and running into problems... but then again, I'm not the be-all-and-end-all of info. :P

Anyways... I made a new installer for English only. It's a bit smaller than the full version, so for those people who need to squeeze every KB out of their UA CDs, this is for you. I've tested it myself without any errors, but as always, let me know if you find any.

.NET Framework 2.0 Silent Installer - English Only - 22.3 MB

Enjoy!


hi sir!
i am new to this thread ...
i just want to report that the package doesn't seem to work for me via HFSLIP ...
i've read that for some it does but for me, it's otherwise ... :(

i might de doing something wrong here but i think not ...
i always end up having to install the MS package after installing XP ... apps that require it report needing to install 2.0 for these to work ...

it didn't integrate successfully as some apps still look for an installation of dotnetfx 2 ... apart from it not being present in Add or Remove Programs, this is what i see in the event viewer when i verify:

Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 -- Error 1406.Could not write value DW0200 to key \Software\Microsoft\PCHealth\ErrorReporting\DW\Installed. System error . Verify that you have sufficient access to that key, or contact your support personnel.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft....link/events.asp.

btw, i run 1.1 & 2.0 one after the other (as i have them both in the process of installation via svcpak) ...

looking forward to your feedback ...

thanks much!

-kiki-

#29 User is offline   Glowy 

  • The voices made me do it!
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 315
  • Joined: 25-March 04

Posted 09 May 2006 - 06:06 AM

View Poststaples, on Oct 28 2005, 10:03 AM, said:

if you want to deploy it via the msi.

expand it
dotnetfx.exe /c /t:"C:\dotnet2\"

get the transform
http://www.zyard.com..._files/free.htm or http://www.zyard.com/files/dotnet2.mst

install it
msiexec /i netfx.msi TRANSFORMS=DOTNET2.MST /qb

Why use the .MST?
the only thing that does is set the public properties ADDEPLOY=1 and REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS
no need for an .MST just use the public properties:
msiexec /i netfx.msi /qb ADDEPLOY=1 REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS

This post has been edited by Glowy: 09 May 2006 - 06:39 AM


#30 User is offline   ophiel 

  • Beatbox Rocker
  • Pip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 16-March 06

Posted 09 May 2006 - 11:21 AM

i got suckered into reading an old thread, i want my 5 minutes back :(

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy