[Weed]

i have removed 1.1 and installed 2.0
no problems here with nlite
dont have other programs to test...

This post has been edited by Weed: 28 October 2005 - 01:28 PM

[sonu27]

Thats good then.

But I removed v2. LOL

I email a person about his program not working with v2 but it works with v1.1. Could anyone tell me if the following is correct?

Quote

At 15:34 27/10/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>
>I've just installed .NET framework version 2.0, just came out
>today.
>
>And I downloaded your program. Said that you neen version 1.1 or

>higher.
>
>Please fix this issue, thanks!

Well, it's not really an issue. .NET 2.0 is not compatible with 1.1 -- they're quite fundamentally different. You will need to have .NET 1.1 installed as well. Since you can install it side-by-side with 2.0 then there shouldn't be any problems.

("1.1 or higher", incidentally, just means 1.x (but not 1.0). If they had released a 1.2 it would have worked with that. But 2.0 is an entirely different kettle of fish.)

--
Gavin Lambert, Mirality Systems
http://www.mirality.co.nz/

Thanks. The program is http://www.mirality.co.nz/maxcode.php MAX Manager.

This post has been edited by sonu27: 30 October 2005 - 07:48 AM

[Tomcat76]

Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal?

[Solid as a rock]

Jazkal, on Oct 28 2005, 05:30 AM, said:

hmmm

You don't need to repackage it, unless I missed something, it will install silently without rebooting with this command:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install /l /q"

Worked for my 32bit install. Haven't tested x64 yet, will get to that tomorrow.

so i need to download the redistable framework 2.0 and install it with your switches and there will be no problems? (as if hotfix and SP packs and tweaks?)

i also read some thing about conflicting 1.1 and 2.0 when installed after each other at one moment? could someone tell me more?

also, i have a problem with my slipstreamed framework 1.1, could someone help me with that? http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...71&#entry419571

[JASpurrier3]

This is for people with slow internet connections or people who do not want to worry about faulty installers. This is a Patch to change the original DOTNETFX.exe (v2.0) to a silent install suitable for Unattended Windows Installations. All it changes is the command executed to install .NET Framework. It does not even mess with the microsoft digital signature. Enjoy!

Attached File(s)

•  DotNetFXv2.0Patch.exe (9K)
  Number of downloads: 263

[favorini]

Passing the /l argument to install.exe will create a verbose MSI log file in %TEMP%.
If you want to put the log file somewhere else, you can use this:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l X:\logdir\dotnet.log"

If the path to your log file has a space, use this:

dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l ""X:\dir with space\dotnet.log"""

[MastaVR6]

Tomcat76, on Nov 9 2005, 01:20 PM, said:

Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal?

I'm also slave to the missing icons in the admintools folder, what gives? -Answer : The SDK is required for viewing the security via a GUI.

See this link http://msdn2.microso...y/2bc0cxhc.aspx

This post has been edited by MastaVR6: 22 February 2006 - 01:18 PM

[Kiki Burgh]

Zxian, on Oct 28 2005, 11:22 AM, said:

I haven't heard of any conflicts between the two versions. I have heard of people using only .NET 2.0 and running into problems... but then again, I'm not the be-all-and-end-all of info.

Anyways... I made a new installer for English only. It's a bit smaller than the full version, so for those people who need to squeeze every KB out of their UA CDs, this is for you. I've tested it myself without any errors, but as always, let me know if you find any.

.NET Framework 2.0 Silent Installer - English Only - 22.3 MB

Enjoy!

hi sir!
i am new to this thread ...
i just want to report that the package doesn't seem to work for me via HFSLIP ...
i've read that for some it does but for me, it's otherwise ...

i might de doing something wrong here but i think not ...
i always end up having to install the MS package after installing XP ... apps that require it report needing to install 2.0 for these to work ...

it didn't integrate successfully as some apps still look for an installation of dotnetfx 2 ... apart from it not being present in Add or Remove Programs, this is what i see in the event viewer when i verify:

Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 -- Error 1406.Could not write value DW0200 to key \Software\Microsoft\PCHealth\ErrorReporting\DW\Installed. System error . Verify that you have sufficient access to that key, or contact your support personnel.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft....link/events.asp.

btw, i run 1.1 & 2.0 one after the other (as i have them both in the process of installation via svcpak) ...

looking forward to your feedback ...

thanks much!

-kiki-

[Glowy]

staples, on Oct 28 2005, 10:03 AM, said:

if you want to deploy it via the msi.

expand it
dotnetfx.exe /c /t:"C:\dotnet2\"

get the transform
http://www.zyard.com..._files/free.htm or http://www.zyard.com/files/dotnet2.mst

install it
msiexec /i netfx.msi TRANSFORMS=DOTNET2.MST /qb

Why use the .MST?
the only thing that does is set the public properties ADDEPLOY=1 and REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS
no need for an .MST just use the public properties:

msiexec /i netfx.msi /qb ADDEPLOY=1 REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS

This post has been edited by Glowy: 09 May 2006 - 06:39 AM

[ophiel]

i got suckered into reading an old thread, i want my 5 minutes back