Frontpage
Forums
Tutorials
Members
Calendar
Subscription
Donate
Links
Contact 
HelpMy hope is to integrate it, and then run it through nLite a second time to strip out Outlook Express. Eyeryone has their own preferences. I need IE for updates, but I don't need OE.
This post has been edited by DanceMan: 07 November 2005 - 01:44 PM
Page 1 of 1
Add ic.exe as hotfix in slipstreming?
#1
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:42 PM
I've finally begun slipstreaming USP 5.0SR1 using nLite. I'd like to try adding Gurgelmeyer's Internet Components file, ic.exe, to the slipstream, so that it would not need to be installed later. I'm going to give it a try, but wondered if anyone has already tried it, or if anyone knows whether it can be treated as a hotfix for the purpose of integration by nLite.
My hope is to integrate it, and then run it through nLite a second time to strip out Outlook Express. Eyeryone has their own preferences. I need IE for updates, but I don't need OE.
My hope is to integrate it, and then run it through nLite a second time to strip out Outlook Express. Eyeryone has their own preferences. I need IE for updates, but I don't need OE.
Back to top
#2
- Senior Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 532
- Joined: 04-November 03
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:20 PM
Also interested but I would like to keep OE in
#3
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 04-February 05
- OS:XP Pro x86
-
Country:
Posted 07 November 2005 - 10:28 PM
Actually, you shouldn't run nlite twice. At least, with previous versions, if you run Nlite on a source that has already been Nlited' you get a mess. Look thru the old posts, I believe Gurgelmeyer has stated that IC was not meant to be slipstreamed - even with Nlite.
You do not really need IE for updates, check out FDV's site, for info on this.
You do not really need IE for updates, check out FDV's site, for info on this.
#4
- Senior Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 532
- Joined: 04-November 03
Posted 08 November 2005 - 02:47 AM
That I agree, I once tred running nLite over again on the same modified WinXP. The end results were very messy
#5
- Gurgelmeyer
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 27-January 05
Posted 08 November 2005 - 11:42 AM
IC.EXE is really (!) complicated to slipstream. Wait a few more days and I'll have something better for everyone I hope 
Best regards,
Gurgelmeyer
Best regards,
Gurgelmeyer
#6
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:06 PM
I just started following this and I was wondering this too.
Data Access Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (Data Access + XML + JET + more + fixes)
Internet Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (IE6SP1 + WAB6 + OE6SP1 + Script Engines + fixes)
DirectX® Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (DirectX 9.0C)
Where is the best place to install those files listed on your site? I understand that we are still unable to integrate them. Are we supposed to just run them after the install with runonce? What switches do those files accept?
Data Access Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (Data Access + XML + JET + more + fixes)
Internet Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (IE6SP1 + WAB6 + OE6SP1 + Script Engines + fixes)
DirectX® Components for Microsoft® Windows® 2000 (DirectX 9.0C)
Where is the best place to install those files listed on your site? I understand that we are still unable to integrate them. Are we supposed to just run them after the install with runonce? What switches do those files accept?
This post has been edited by johnnyb: 10 January 2006 - 05:07 PM
#7
- win2k Freak
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 639
- Joined: 23-November 04
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:45 PM
uses the 5.1 release, after that, you only nead 2 updates - a MS-Spyware-removal-tool (run once process), and could update to NET1.1 and 2.0 and dx9c after that you ara just about completely up 2 date
#8
Posted 16 January 2006 - 12:38 AM
I slipstreamed USP5.1, removing OE and WMP, and have had no problems.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1