Apologies if this poll has been done
How often do you reinstall?
#3
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:16 PM
Attached File(s)
-
frank_ddarko.png (20.71K)
Number of downloads: 5
#5
Posted 17 November 2005 - 12:51 AM
for windows nt, i did five installs in a day, before i found out what snap-shot meant.
for windows 2k, i did about three installs in a day, largely testing out the fdv files.
generally, i avoid doing installs of #1 system, because one learns more from trying to keep the poor dear going.
Wendy
#6
Posted 17 November 2005 - 01:41 PM
exept for my test machine ofcaure, i switch all the time, to day its running windows tomorrow probebly a hacked version of the new x86 mod to OSX and the day after tomorrow id could as easely be a new flavor of linux
and hey i still didn't come around testing what sun solaris for x86 looks like, so only god knows it might be next sunday.
do i tweak windows? hell yeah, if windows is like the bible id burn, i tell ya... no reay, its a about ripping out the d*mn parts MS should have never put in, in the first place (imho). but in the mean time it, ofcaurse is a great learning curve.
but the last question seams a bit of, for example answers might be,
> sorry didn't nead the update, i already nlted the bug.
> update what update, you mean the new bugg MS wants me to add
> doing but, install it on my machine and add it the the slipsream list, for future intergration.
#7
Posted 18 November 2005 - 08:17 PM
Now on my personal rig, I only reload every month or three now, since I really don't use it other than for surfing and downloading. Back when I was playing games and trying out all kinds of applications it was weekly.
And what is FDV? Can't say I've ever seen that acronym...File Difference Verification?
#8
Posted 18 November 2005 - 08:20 PM
DIE NTLDR DIE !!!!!!!!!!!
#9
Posted 19 November 2005 - 03:20 AM
Quote
my initials. i made an easy way to remove internet explorer from windows 2000.
you download files, then drag and drop into i386 (replacing anything there already) and then burn, and you are IE-free.
the page also has details how to make an updated fully patched and slipstreamed windows (2000, xp, 2003).
click the graphic in the sig for more info.
#10
Posted 19 November 2005 - 06:37 AM
Great topic, horrible poll.
I use a virtual machine for testing new builds with hotfix integration and I release them as test candidates. To be honest I not only reinstall Windows but several flavors of Windows each day.
The host operating system gets reinstalled once a year on my network controller and whenever I feel like it on my development box. That comes out to about once every 6 months. I look for performance gains when using virtual machines. So far MCE2005 gives absolutely no problems as the host OS. Windows XP Home limits me too much while Pro is a memory hog...I wonder why. o.O
#11
Posted 19 November 2005 - 07:54 AM
The 10 hotfix question was a bit misleading though, I voted just manually install... but from my experience the average monthly hotfix release is less than a handful. I think if it was 10 - I'd likely take the opportunity to reinstall though.
#12
Posted 19 November 2005 - 08:03 AM
Crash&Burn, on Nov 19 2005, 05:54 AM, said:
Ahaha! <3!
Crash&Burn, on Nov 19 2005, 05:54 AM, said:
No it's vague because it isn't mentioned what they apply to. Sure 10 hotfixes is no big deal on XP Pro, but what about Windows 2000 Pro? Windows 2000 Adv Server? Windows XP MCE? Windows Server 2003.......
#13
Posted 20 November 2005 - 10:45 AM
FDV...I see now, that's clever. I checked out the site, and while it is easy in the end it's just a little ironic that the link is like thirty pages long!
#14
Posted 20 November 2005 - 10:51 AM
Every 6 months or less on my real PC
(but maybe once or twice daily on VMware)...
Just because Bill Gates says not to.
(but also to learn, to get more fps and save resources too...)
Apply the hotfixes without reinstalling. Unless there's
a radical upgrade like Windows XP Service Pack 3 or something...
This post has been edited by ChipCraze23: 20 November 2005 - 12:19 PM
#15
Posted 20 November 2005 - 10:58 AM
#16
Posted 20 November 2005 - 11:07 AM
#17
Posted 07 December 2005 - 02:57 AM
But that's just not possible with Windows. With all the malware out there, you have to keep on top of patches, and once multiple programs get patched, things start breaking, something slips through your security defenses, computer slows down despite running registry cleaners.
Plus, I'm always downloading crap and trying it out and sometimes it leaves tons of crap behind that screws up my system, so at some point reinstalls are necessary.
After a while, especially when M$ releases one of its monstrous 9 or 10 patches in a month, it makes sense to do a reinstall.
#18
Posted 20 May 2006 - 01:35 AM
I'm curious to get new input on this from members who are new to MSFN since this was published 6 months ago.
#19
Posted 20 May 2006 - 11:39 AM
However, for the other 2 questions I reinstall my main rig approximately every 1-2 years - testing machines get rebuilt pretty much every other week (i.e. Vista builds at work).
On a running system I just apply the hotfixes delivered by Windows Update as there is no benefit in updating an install image and reinstalling a system, then having the hassle of reinstalling all the apps and setting preferences back up.
I do , however, maintain my silent install DVD image with SATA/RAID drivers, slipstreamed hotfixes and silently-installed apps to minimize the effort if a rebuild is required - this is just common sense as I'm running RAID0 for my OS & app partitions.
Currently running XP x64 Edition, next reinstall will be when Vista is released and I'll put the 64-bit version on after checking my apps & games work flawlessly.
#20
Posted 21 May 2006 - 06:23 AM
First option: Voted for the second, I only reinstall if my machine plays up on me.
Second option: Didn't really match, so I voted the first one.
Third option: Second option. No need to slipstream them, just install.
Why would you need to reinstall Windows daily? Doesn't make sense.



Help

Back to top









