Login to Account Create an Account
Which version of Windows sucks the most?
Posted 12 May 2008 - 08:50 AM
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!!
yeah quick and dirty. i got my clone brush license from a crackerjack box
Posted 15 May 2008 - 08:18 PM
I thought I would put my 2 cents worth on this and while I have only had Windows XP both versions and Windows 98se I would have to say for the learnability aspect I would go with 98se it doesnt have the quick fixes and available updates from Microsoft, they are easy enough to find elsewhere , if your not careful though it will let you delete things that are imparative to your system unlike XP that will block you from making HUGE deletes...learned that the hard way...this is a brilliant site and I have learned things in just the few hours from many different postings...you people are wicked smart...
so thank you..
Posted 15 May 2008 - 08:34 PM
Posted 21 May 2008 - 03:08 PM
Posted 21 May 2008 - 03:46 PM
Posted 21 May 2008 - 05:45 PM
and Vista Sucks too.
Vista is unnecessary Luxury...
Actually, the same can be said for XP. Windows 2000 is my backup OS.
You don't have to worry about Windows Product Activation and Windows Genuine Advantage with Windows 2000.
Posted 21 May 2008 - 09:11 PM
Only Win2008 is slowly starting to become usable (still with some issues though).
Posted 22 May 2008 - 07:16 AM
I erased the bloat!
Posted 22 May 2008 - 09:16 PM
Posted 23 May 2008 - 05:13 AM
Desktop: Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.4ghz || G. Skill Ripjaws 16GB DDR3 2133 || ASUS P8Z77-V LK || EVGA GeForce GTX-750 Ti SC 2GB || 128GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD || 2TB WD Black SATA3 HDD || Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO || Corsair TX650M || Fractal Designs Arc Midi || Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Posted 25 May 2008 - 06:53 AM
Edited by Kiki Burgh, 25 May 2008 - 06:55 AM.
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:27 PM
and vista (to sme extend) feels like ME 2 (Mistake Edition The 2nd)
Read Full Article @ [A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection]Don't be lame [Linux is NOT Windows]
Posted 29 May 2008 - 06:19 AM
Posted 29 May 2008 - 03:20 PM
Posted 31 May 2008 - 01:41 PM
ME was the product of trying to rush out an update to Win9x, while the development team was concentrating on Win 2000.
Posted 31 May 2008 - 01:54 PM
Posted 11 June 2008 - 06:00 AM
Posted 19 June 2008 - 12:08 PM
It's not fair, that Windows ME gets all the bad press. Spread it around a little.
I built a PC in 2000 for a customer of mine and since ME was the latest and greatest OS at the time, that's what went on that PC.
Just a few months ago, 8 years later, I got that PC back, in payment for installing a whole new system for my customer.
It was still running just fine on Windows ME. Over the 8 years that PC has been running, I've kept it going with a new CD drive here and a floppy drive there, etc. Nothing serious.
Well, after all that time, Windows ME is still running like a champ! My customer never had any problems with it and I haven't either. I've since added some more ram and a much larger wattage PSU and it's a little Screaming Demon!
I cleaned and oiled the Thermaltake CPU cooler that was howling and it now runs as good as it did 8 years ago.
So I'd like to change my vote, from ME to Vista. Now there's a real hog!
Posted 19 June 2008 - 05:14 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users