Swimming_Bird, on Jan 5 2006, 01:37 PM, said:
MAVERICKS CHOICE, on Jan 3 2006, 09:03 PM, said:
muiz, on Jan 4 2006, 01:45 PM, said:
BoardBabe, on Jan 2 2006, 04:09 PM, said:
Why not compile the script to .exe?
thats how i do it , works for me
Yeah,but ya don't need to..
if you need to worry about the space wasted in compiling all ur scripts then there are much easier ways to save space.
not to mention you actually get some added features from using a compiled script
What features are better when compiled ?
Compiling
+ Standalone executable.
+ Easier commandline.
- Need to use compile Directives to change resource information for script version identification.
UnCompiled
+ Easy to edit.
+ No Compiler Directives to worry about.
+ Space saving.
+ Easy to check the contents before burning.
+ Any #Include files can be shared.
+ No need to store script sources separately for Compile.
+ No need to decompile.
+ Less chance of curruption.
+ No false-positive virus alerts.
+ More AutoIt scripts used makes Uncompiled scripts easier to manage.
+ Can do anything a compiled script can do, other then the AutoIt3.exe needed to execute.
To be honest, compiling absolutely sucks when not required. So does 1 line statements without some facts to show.
My whole UA Disk runs on uncompiled autoit scripts and I have mentioned my simple method before shown
here.