[azaze1]

I've noticed this with the last two full feature releases, and also with the new Lite V1. If you have certain entries with a required item in the "Dependent of" field, the item itself will not be checked for install when you choose "Select All"

My current config has 3 items with dependencies, and when I choose "Select All" all 3 remain unchecked.

I've attached my config, try plugging it into your WPI and see if you get the same behavior.  config.js (14.03K)
Number of downloads: 61

[Glowy]

I have the same, also an application with a dependency will completely ignore the dflt[pn]=['yes'] entry.

[BoardBabe]

You will need to hve the dependant apps listed in order.

Office
App1
App2 -dependant APP1
App3 -dependant APP2

[Glowy]

BoardBabe, on Mar 29 2006, 09:18 PM, said:

You will need to hve the dependant apps listed in order.

Office
App1
App2 -dependant APP1
App3 -dependant APP2

But that only works if the category is alphabetically sorted.

example app1 in category applications is dependent of app2 in category system.
it doesn't work.
in reverse app1 in category system is dependent of app2 in category applications works.

[BoardBabe]

Yes, that's true and I find that to be a problem...

[Glowy]

BoardBabe, on Apr 3 2006, 10:03 PM, said:

Yes, that's true and I find that to be a problem...

Same here, I was looking at WPI to replace Xplode because of the dynamic dependency function.
When this is sorted, I will probably change from Xplode to WPI, in the mean time I'll stick with Xplode, because I don't want to re-write my scripts just yet.

This post has been edited by Glowy: 03 April 2006 - 02:20 PM

[owikh84]

same prob happened to me.. many times

[owikh84]

any fix for this?

Attached File(s)

•  config.js (7.5K)
  Number of downloads: 7
•  useroptions.js (792bytes)
  Number of downloads: 6