WinPE 2.0
#21
Posted 01 March 2006 - 03:12 PM
#22
Posted 07 March 2006 - 12:02 AM
#23
#24
Posted 14 March 2006 - 12:52 AM
So.. read the docs.. it's all there. Step by step.
#25
Posted 14 March 2006 - 03:27 PM
Vagabond8, on Mar 14 2006, 01:52 AM, said:
So.. read the docs.. it's all there. Step by step.
Thanks. I found the procedure you were talking about and mad ethe first bootable CD. However, it would not get past the winloader.exe stage. I used the boot.wim file from the VISTA DVD. I think other people ran into the same problem too. How did you create your bootable CD? Please let me know. Thanks.
#26
Posted 15 March 2006 - 09:58 AM
#27
Posted 15 March 2006 - 10:37 AM
While he said it a bit quickly, Fizban has the answer. The problem is the last step of the Windows PE help file tells you to perform an XIMAGE /Export on the WIM file you created. Don't do that, because you lose it's bootable format. Just copy it straight into your Sources folder rather than doing the export.
That'll fix your Winload issue.
#28
Posted 16 March 2006 - 09:17 AM
#29
Posted 16 March 2006 - 10:38 PM
Albuquerque, on Mar 15 2006, 11:37 AM, said:
While he said it a bit quickly, Fizban has the answer. The problem is the last step of the Windows PE help file tells you to perform an XIMAGE /Export on the WIM file you created. Don't do that, because you lose it's bootable format. Just copy it straight into your Sources folder rather than doing the export.
That'll fix your Winload issue.
Alright! Thanks for your help. I will try it first thing in the morning.
How far did everyone get with WDS?
#30
Posted 17 March 2006 - 12:28 PM
#31
Posted 20 March 2006 - 09:37 AM
Albuquerque, on Mar 15 2006, 11:37 AM, said:
While he said it a bit quickly, Fizban has the answer. The problem is the last step of the Windows PE help file tells you to perform an XIMAGE /Export on the WIM file you created. Don't do that, because you lose it's bootable format. Just copy it straight into your Sources folder rather than doing the export.
That'll fix your Winload issue.
I appreciate your help. However, I am still getting the winloader.exe error after copying the file directly from the original directory. The file I used was: F1_WinPE.wim. The steps I followed are below: (I did not use the ximage /expport command). Should I have used a different WIM file? Thanks.
Step 1: Setup a Windows PE Build EnvironmentOpen a command prompt window.
Create a local Windows PE build directory, for example:
mkdir winpe\boot
mkdir winpe\sources
The \winpe directory will be used for creating an .iso image.
Step 2: Create an .iso imageCopy boot files from Microsoft Vista OPK CD or Windows PE CD to local build location. Create an .iso using oscdimg tool. For example:
copy \\<CD path location>\bootmgr C:\winpe
xcopy /cherky \\<CD path location>\boot C:\winpe\boot
ximage /export /compress max C:\winpebuild\boot.wim 1 c:\winpe\sources\boot.wim
oscdimg -n -b\\<CD path location>\etfsboot.com c:\winpe c:\winpe.iso
#32
Posted 20 March 2006 - 11:43 AM
Make a C:\winpebuild\build directory
Make sure you have a directory named C:\Winpe, with subfolders Sources\ and Boot\
Make sure bootmgr is in C:\Winpe
Make sure the contents of the C:\Winpe\Boot folder match that of your bootable Vista CD
Then do the two items below:
ximage /apply C:\winpebuild\winpe.wim 1 C:\winpebuild\build (do NOT use boot.wim, use Winpe.wim)
ximage /capture C:\winpebuild\build C:\Winpe\Sources\boot.wim "Description" /boot /compress max
You'll now have a bootable boot.wim stored in the C:\winpe\Sources folder. Basically you can now do the OSCDIMG like you did before:
oscdimg -n -b\\<CD path location>\etfsboot.com c:\winpe c:\winpe.iso
#33
Posted 20 March 2006 - 12:30 PM
Albuquerque, on Mar 20 2006, 12:43 PM, said:
Make a C:\winpebuild\build directory
Make sure you have a directory named C:\Winpe, with subfolders Sources\ and Boot\
Make sure bootmgr is in C:\Winpe
Make sure the contents of the C:\Winpe\Boot folder match that of your bootable Vista CD
Then do the two items below:
ximage /apply C:\winpebuild\winpe.wim 1 C:\winpebuild\build (do NOT use boot.wim, use Winpe.wim)
ximage /capture C:\winpebuild\build C:\Winpe\Sources\boot.wim "Description" /boot /compress max
You'll now have a bootable boot.wim stored in the C:\winpe\Sources folder. Basically you can now do the OSCDIMG like you did before:
oscdimg -n -b\\<CD path location>\etfsboot.com c:\winpe c:\winpe.iso
I got it working. The part i didn't do from day 1 is ximage /apply. Where did you get your winpe.wim image file? I actually used boot.wim and got it working. I am now in the command prompt. I need to do more research on what I can do next
Sammycat
#34
Posted 20 March 2006 - 02:31 PM
#35
Posted 20 March 2006 - 03:55 PM
#36
Posted 21 March 2006 - 09:02 AM
fizban2, on Mar 20 2006, 04:55 PM, said:
Definitely an advantage there. One thing I do miss is Ghost's multicast ability -- being able to image 100 machines simultaneously with essentially no speed loss is a nice thing to have.
#37
Posted 21 March 2006 - 10:38 AM
Albuquerque, on Mar 20 2006, 02:31 PM, said:
If you disable the compression, you should generally find that it can keep up with, if not exceed, the speed of Ghost (or PQDI - which Ghost is now based upon). It's apples to oranges to compare a WIM doing compression with a Ghost or PQDI image that is simply picking up sectors (and yes, throwing out the blank ones, as PQDI can do).
#38
Posted 21 March 2006 - 11:42 AM
Quote
just get WDS setup for an unattended install, not as efficent as multicast, but it is still better then nothing
#39
Posted 21 March 2006 - 12:33 PM
fizban2, on Mar 21 2006, 12:42 PM, said:
Not sure if WDS would make up for the speed gain of multicasting a single sysprepped image to 100 machines simultaneously. That's two hundred gigabytes of data transfer (in simplistic terms) that must be moved one way or another, and WDS just isn't going to move it that much faster in my opinion.
XIMAGE still definitely has uses, especially in an upgrade methodology. Just not sure it's going to replace Ghost anytime soon for massive deployment of brand new machines. (We lease refreshed over a thousand machines this quarter; there's probably 50 machines at any given time being imaged in our implementation department)
Edited because I can't do math
This post has been edited by Albuquerque: 21 March 2006 - 12:40 PM
#40
Posted 22 March 2006 - 12:36 PM
Quote
oh i agree that WDS probably won't replace ghost mulitcast for large scale imagings, but on a smaller scale it will work very well. sadly i don't have more then a couple machine availble in the lab for testing so i can't being to even test to speed and such with WDS but hopefully soon. I am curious to see how it does with 10 or so machines are pulling images down.



Help

Back to top









