MSFN Forum: HFSLIP - Test releases - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 119 Pages +
  • « First
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

HFSLIP - Test releases Support ended. Rate Topic: ***** 1 Votes

#1741 User is offline   grunz 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 27 July 2007 - 12:52 AM

message deleted by mod so we can keep this on topic.


#1742 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 27 July 2007 - 08:15 PM

View PostGlowy, on Jul 27 2007, 08:48 AM, said:

hmmmm.. tested 1.6.2rc1

WU claims roots update is not installed.. :s
There's a new roots update for XP/2K3.

#1743 User is offline   Glowy 

  • The voices made me do it!
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 315
  • Joined: 25-March 04

Posted 30 July 2007 - 06:14 AM

View PostTomcat76, on Jul 28 2007, 04:15 AM, said:



Ah yes, that explains it.. tested rc2.. no problems.

This post has been edited by Glowy: 30 July 2007 - 06:15 AM


#1744 User is offline   fdv 

  • MSFN Expert
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,090
  • Joined: 16-July 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 July 2007 - 10:47 PM

View PostTomcat76, on Jul 25 2007, 03:05 PM, said:

Windows setup doesn't like to see a modified LAYOUT.INF. System File Protection needs to be modfied/disabled for this which is what I don't want HFSLIP to do. TommyP may have a different take on this but I won't do it. I'm sorry.


BTW, it has nothing to do with SFC.
Here is the deal with this file. I hadn't had my coffee so I made like 5 posts explaining it.
Here is the deal with LAYOUT

BTW, hi all! Long time no see, etc etc.

#1745 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 31 July 2007 - 05:51 AM

Interesting... Thanks.

#1746 User is offline   NtegrA 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 11-July 05

Posted 26 September 2007 - 12:22 PM

Cross posting this one. I posted to main thread by accident.....

Is it me or is something wrong in SVCPACK.inf? Using 1.6.3rc1 (also same with 70814a):

[SetupHotfixesToRun]
HFSLIP.CMD
0_RogueSpearsRuntimesCF.exe
oemscan.exe
VMwareTools.exe
HFSLIP.CMD


I'm also attempting to track down an issue where permissions are being changed on "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies". Could HFSLIP be the culprit? I'm not pointing fingers yet, I am still backtracking to get a good build first. Only changes that come to mind are versions of HFSLIP and versions of RogueSpear's runtimes (RogueSpearsRuntimesCF & RogueSpearsRuntimesPart2) used. AND OF COURSE any additional MS Hotfixes that I added.

#1747 User is offline   jimmsta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 369
  • Joined: 04-May 05

Posted 26 September 2007 - 03:22 PM

View PostNtegrA, on Sep 26 2007, 02:22 PM, said:

Cross posting this one. I posted to main thread by accident.....

Is it me or is something wrong in SVCPACK.inf? Using 1.6.3rc1 (also same with 70814a):

[SetupHotfixesToRun]
 HFSLIP.CMD
 0_RogueSpearsRuntimesCF.exe
 oemscan.exe
 VMwareTools.exe
 HFSLIP.CMD


I'm also attempting to track down an issue where permissions are being changed on "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies". Could HFSLIP be the culprit? I'm not pointing fingers yet, I am still backtracking to get a good build first. Only changes that come to mind are versions of HFSLIP and versions of RogueSpear's runtimes (RogueSpearsRuntimesCF & RogueSpearsRuntimesPart2) used. AND OF COURSE any additional MS Hotfixes that I added.

Take a look at the contents of HFSLIP.CMD. In mine, I've got this line: "IF EXIST %SYSTEMROOT%\HFSLIP.TMP GOTO :PART2", which indicates that the script is supposed to be run at least once already. I think what you're seeing is normal. Also, even though I know this issue has been addressed to death, but having underscores in addon names could be causing problems. I myself use RogueSpears' runtimes, and haven't had any problems in the local policy settings. Strange.

#1748 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 30 September 2007 - 09:44 AM

@NtegrA

If you're referring to the two instances of HFSLIP.CMD... that's intentional. It's the cleanest way to satisfy several requests (order of installation, .NET before MSI installers, etc.).

I've observed the same permissions problem recently. It may have to do with the key that HFSLIP is adding for LegitCheckControl.dll on Windows XP SP2 but I need to test that. Thanks for posting this.

#1749 User is offline   NtegrA 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 11-July 05

Posted 01 October 2007 - 06:58 AM

View PostTomcat76, on Sep 30 2007, 11:44 AM, said:

@NtegrA

If you're referring to the two instances of HFSLIP.CMD... that's intentional. It's the cleanest way to satisfy several requests (order of installation, .NET before MSI installers, etc.).

I've observed the same permissions problem recently. It may have to do with the key that HFSLIP is adding for LegitCheckControl.dll on Windows XP SP2 but I need to test that. Thanks for posting this.

Excellent! On both counts.

I had widdled down to not using any .net stuff to see where I was. Last run through no go. The last version I believe was successful for me (I should know today), was either 1.6.2 or 70616b or 70812a.

#1750 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 01 October 2007 - 10:16 AM

Don't bother; it was the LegitCheckControl.dll registry key. Or better: HFSLIP 1.6.0 and newer adding it into the registry from a registry hive during the first Windows setup stage. Version 1.6.3 fixes this problem by adding it into the registry at T-13 as in version 1.5.0 and earlier.

#1751 User is offline   NtegrA 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 11-July 05

Posted 02 October 2007 - 06:21 AM

View PostTomcat76, on Oct 1 2007, 12:16 PM, said:

Don't bother; it was the LegitCheckControl.dll registry key. Or better: HFSLIP 1.6.0 and newer adding it into the registry from a registry hive during the first Windows setup stage. Version 1.6.3 fixes this problem by adding it into the registry at T-13 as in version 1.5.0 and earlier.

heh. :} too late.

Will try 1.6.3 right now and report back

#1752 User is offline   the_guy 

  • Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 901
  • Joined: 15-July 05
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 02 October 2007 - 02:58 PM

The date in the main post is wrong. It says July 30th, when it should say October 1.

the_guy

#1753 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 02 October 2007 - 06:32 PM

Heh... It took me half an hour to figure out what you meant. I was thinking of "main thread" and just couldn't find it... :P

#1754 User is offline   NtegrA 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 11-July 05

Posted 03 October 2007 - 06:23 AM

Happy to report 1.6.3 is working and all is right with the world once more (yeah right!)

Thanks

This post has been edited by NtegrA: 03 October 2007 - 06:24 AM


#1755 User is offline   Flappieee 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 06-October 07

Posted 06 October 2007 - 09:54 AM

Question: Is there support for the latest version of Internet Explorer 7 (the version without WGA; version 7.0.5730.13) in the latest version of HFSLIP?
Question 2: In wich folder do i have to place the roots update package? in HF?

#1756 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 06 October 2007 - 10:56 AM

A new test release to support the new IE7 installer is in the making. I'm now testing in a VM.

The roots update goes in the HF folder, yes.

#1757 User is offline   Flappieee 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 06-October 07

Posted 06 October 2007 - 12:18 PM

View PostTomcat76, on Oct 6 2007, 06:56 PM, said:

A new test release to support the new IE7 installer is in the making. I'm now testing in a VM.

The roots update goes in the HF folder, yes.


Okeey :thumbup

What is the release date of this version. Do you have any idea? I cant't wait :P

#1758 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 06 October 2007 - 01:32 PM

How 'bout now? :)

#1759 User is offline   Flappieee 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 06-October 07

Posted 07 October 2007 - 03:32 AM

View PostTomcat76, on Oct 6 2007, 09:32 PM, said:

How 'bout now? :)


Ha okey!
This 1.6.3 version supports the latest Internet Explorer without WGA? Can't find it in the changelog :unsure:

#1760 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 07 October 2007 - 05:59 AM

I was talking about a test release. Please check the first post in this thread :)

Share this topic:


  • 119 Pages +
  • « First
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy