Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account


Photo

What Anti-Virus do you Use/Recommend?

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
392 replies to this topic

Poll: What Anti-Virus do you Use/Recommend? (1064 member(s) have cast votes)

What Anti-Virus do you Use/Recommend?

  1. Voted AntiVir (53 votes [5.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.49%

  2. Voted Avast (94 votes [9.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.73%

  3. AVG (97 votes [10.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.04%

  4. Voted BitDefender (26 votes [2.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.69%

  5. ClamAV (14 votes [1.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.45%

  6. eTrust (12 votes [1.24%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.24%

  7. F-Prot (11 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  8. Voted Kaspersky (154 votes [15.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.94%

  9. Voted McAfee (30 votes [3.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.11%

  10. Voted NOD32 (272 votes [28.16%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.16%

  11. Norton (28 votes [2.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.90%

  12. Voted Symantec (60 votes [6.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.21%

  13. Voted Trend Micro (20 votes [2.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.07%

  14. Voted Other - ? (51 votes [5.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.28%

  15. None! (44 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#76
Jeremy

Jeremy

    Casual Poster

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,473 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Kaspersky is taking up 7 MBs during Idle all the time. :)

Edited by Jeremy, 26 May 2006 - 02:20 PM.



How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#77
Maleko

Maleko

    Gold Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,111 posts
using avg now, used to use norton, but its a pain to use now, resource hungry.

lokking at getting NOD32
Posted Image

#78
Ultimate Predator

Ultimate Predator

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 93 posts
eTrust, tiny resource usage, but still very powerful. Avast is pretty good.

#79
sonu27

sonu27

    Panjabi By Nature

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 762 posts
I have never heard of NOD32, until on this forum.

What so good about it?

I don't have AV since they take up too manu resources on my slow machine.

#80
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Nod32 and Kaspersky have very good detection rates and use minimal system resources.
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |

#81
Jeremy

Jeremy

    Casual Poster

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,473 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

I don't have AV since they take up too manu resources on my slow machine.

Post #76.

#82
awergh

awergh

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,059 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
i use avg but maybe i should try nod32

#83
XP_2600

XP_2600

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 197 posts

NOD32 boasts excellent credentials worthy of an effective guard. Microsoft uses NOD32 in their release labs. Canon Japan also exclusively uses NOD32. ESET's software claimed the Virus Bulletin's coveted 100% award in every test since May 1998 and the ICSA Labs (Internet Computer Security Association) has given their "nod" to NOD32.


NOD32 Review
Images in signatures shall NOT exceed a total of 300x100 and 80kb - N1K

#84
Carmon

Carmon

    MSFN's Local Mental Case

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,598 posts
wasnt really much of a Fan of Nod32 i really liked Kaspersky detection was perfect at the moment am trying out Avast like the Boot Scanner but i think thats all i like about it to be honest
Posted Image

#85
Jeremy

Jeremy

    Casual Poster

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,473 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
AV Comparatives.org's May 2006 Pure Retrospective Results are in:

http://www.av-compar...sse_2006_05.php

NOD32 is the winner here.

Edited by Jeremy, 02 June 2006 - 05:33 PM.


#86
atomizer

atomizer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
EDIT: I removed some content from my post because, like the idot i am, i was confusing NOD with Norton!!! Two WAY different products and as far as i know, NOD is a very good A/V.

When you read published results of how 'good' an A/V tool is, you have to take that information with a grain of salt. Often they don't include information like how well it gets along with your system or how many problems people have had with it. I've reason to believe that some A/V vendors tailor their s/w just to secure a good score and some of the criteria that the reviewers set is rather stupid.

I've used several products in the past, including AVG and Avast!. I've probably used the latter for the longest period of time. I think i used some sort of Norton security suite WAY back when.

Avast! is really good and it doesn't infect and bog down your system. They also seem like an ethical bunch. Once when i scanned a file which i thought was a known trojan and Avast! didn't alert, i emailed them about it. They explained exactly why it wasn't in their definitions and i agreed that they were right not to include it. I also asked them why they didn't make the VB 100% score on Virus Bulletin (http://www.virusbtn.com/index) (they are probably considered thee authority on A/V stuff) one time and they also explained that in detail. That's when i started to learn about the screwy criteria that some A/V reviewers set.

As Avast! progressed, it also got a little too bloated for my taste (been using it since early beta), so i started looking for alternatives. I found ClamWin and it was exactly what i wanted! -- no bLOAt, no hogging resources, no slowing down of my system, powerful command line options, a super clean GUI, completely free and, to top it off, open source. Updates are pumped out faster than some major vendors (Clam is set to check it's database hourly by default) and background scanning isn't even an option. Right now it's an on-demand scanner only, so i'd suggest noobs stay away. As an open source product, i think that would take the pressure off the developers to advertise useless statistics like "we detect 49,0000 known viruses". They also don't have to compromise their product to get a "good score" with any reviewers.

Edited by atomizer, 03 June 2006 - 03:24 AM.


#87
Ophiel X

Ophiel X

    i wear my sunglasses at night

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 125 posts
wow atomizer, you really do pick the worst AVs to rely on.

i think that would take the pressure off the developers to advertise useless statistics like "we detect 49,0000 known viruses"


ahahaha. yah, i prefer an antivirus that can only detect ten viruses
"Keep working, keep struggling, keep marching together. We are doing something brand new here-trying to stop a war before it starts. Trying to rebuild a serious peace movement.. Trying to slow down the strong, to protect innocent children. Trying to fend off the trap of empire, and redeem the hope of democracy.. Don't you give up. Don't surrender. Your spirit and faith will be tested; the war machine will give us fierce opposition. But faith can move mountains." - Jesse Jackson

#88
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
have you seen this?
http://portableapps....ortable_clamwin
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |

#89
atomizer

atomizer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

wow atomizer, you really do pick the worst AVs to rely on.
ahahaha. yah, i prefer an antivirus that can only detect ten viruses

i prefer intelligent comments from knowledgeable people who've done their research. oh well, guess i'm out of luck.

have you seen this?
http://portableapps....ortable_clamwin

i knew it was portable, but didn't see that page. good catch :)

#90
playsafe

playsafe

    Well we've made it this far

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 119 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
I use Symantec's 8.0. It is resource hungary surely but works for me.

I must admit that first time I have read abt NOD32. I really did not know it exists. I am really impressed with its rating in this Poll. And will try to test it soon.
Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to drivers.
To err is human... to blame your computer for your mistakes is even more human.

#91
Zxian

Zxian

    Scroll up - see the Google bar?

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,066 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

There's way too may horror stories with NOD, some of which i've experienced myself on other peoples machines. IMO, for all intents and purposes, NOD is a virus.

In computer security, a computer virus is a self-replicating computer program that spreads by inserting copies of itself into other executable code or documents.

Wikipedia - Computer Virus

I've never heard of NOD32 installing itself on other computers automatically... :P


But honestly - "way too many horror stories"? I've heard of some incompatibilities (DX8 cards and the custom GUI for example, Azureus IMON problem), but never any real horror stories. Any links or specific examples?

have you seen this?
http://portableapps....ortable_clamwin

That's defintately cool. I'll be adding that to my USB stick. :)

#92
atomizer

atomizer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

I've never heard of NOD32 installing itself on other computers automatically... :P
...But honestly - "way too many horror stories"? I've heard of some incompatibilities (DX8 cards and the custom GUI for example, Azureus IMON problem), but never any real horror stories. Any links or specific examples?

Man-oh-man!!! I did it AGAIN! My fault -- i keep confusing NOD with NORTON! Far as i know, NOD is a very good product. Sorry about that.

#93
DigeratiPrime

DigeratiPrime

    MSFN Junkie

  • Patrons
  • 3,550 posts
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Man-oh-man!!! I did it AGAIN! My fault -- i keep confusing NOD with NORTON! Far as i know, NOD is a very good product. Sorry about that.


thats a pretty bad mistake! :P btw Have you heard of Norman antivirus? :D
Recommended Software: KeePass | Microsoft ICE | VisualWget | Vitamin D Video |

#94
atomizer

atomizer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

thats a pretty bad mistake! :P btw Have you heard of Norman antivirus? :D

I have. I don't know anything about it, though the name sounds like an obvious rip from Notron and it they're trying to be like them, well, heh.

#95
Zxian

Zxian

    Scroll up - see the Google bar?

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,066 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Hehe... I thought that might be out of place. I decided to take the cheeky route. :P

But yeah... Norton is a pretty horrible product. :no:

#96
janus zeal

janus zeal

    :3

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 239 posts
I use AVG free. im thinking about getting kaspersky, but i see no resion to stop useing avg. its worked great for me so far.

i would also like to conferm how much norton sucks. its not even funny.

how good is NOD32?

Edited by janus zeal, 05 June 2006 - 11:06 PM.

~janus zeal
irc.netchan.org

#97
Zxian

Zxian

    Scroll up - see the Google bar?

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,066 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
You can download a 30-day trial of NOD32 from their website - www.eset.com

I've always prefered NOD32 over Kaspersky - it's not me saying one is better than the other - it's just personal preference. Kaspersky is a very good on-demand scanner, and I've heard that the real-time scanning performance has improved with version 6, but I haven't tested it yet.

#98
janus zeal

janus zeal

    :3

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 239 posts
I guess i will give both try before i decide. ive heard good things about both, so i shall see...
~janus zeal
irc.netchan.org

#99
GeneralMandible

GeneralMandible

    Major

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 223 posts
NOD32 got my vote. It boiled down to the resource usage. I used it on my 2000 Server (AMD K6-II 350 w/ 128MB RAM) up until recently. It had a bad reaction to heat. Anyway, it ran great on that little old box for a couple of years. The interface is a little clunky which is the only downfall I can think of for it.

I still have Norton SystemWorks 2004 on my main system w/ no problems & decent detection when I do something stupid. It does have problems removing things, though. I then have to remove them manually. It has some other functions that I like so I haven't jumped ship...yet. I definitely will never touch their Internet Security Suite. I have seen many problems first-hand with Symantec products & don't recommend them to anyone, nor will I buy anymore. :realmad:

I use AVG on my wife's computer and that works ok.

I use McAfee Enterprise 8.0 on my laptop. Seems to work just fine and can detect some adware/spyware.

I will have to try out Kaspersky. Since 2002, when I first heard of them, they've been held in high regard. Looks like another job for VMware. :yes:
"I am the colony!"
My Website

#100
Elektrik

Elektrik

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts
I use Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic now. But :angry:

Posted Image

http://virusscan.jotti.org/

totalcmd.exe from Total Commander :yes:

:whistle:

Posted Image

Edited by Elektrik, 01 July 2006 - 02:16 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



How to remove advertisement from MSFN