MSFN Forum: Win XP or Server 2003 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

If you have questions about customizing Windows XP that are nLite-specific, please post them in the nLite forum, not here. If you have questions regarding the unattended installation of Windows XP, please post them in the Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003 section.
  • 7 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Win XP or Server 2003 Which One? Rate Topic: -----

Poll: Which One (487 member(s) have cast votes)

Which One

  1. Windows XP Pro (203 votes [60.06%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.06%

  2. Windows Sever 2003 (122 votes [36.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.09%

  3. Other (13 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

Vote

#1 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

  Posted 08 August 2003 - 04:56 PM

Which one should i run on my new pc???

:)


#2 User is offline   Drewdatrip 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,185
  • Joined: 14-October 01

Posted 08 August 2003 - 05:08 PM

depends on the purpose.
Desktop=XP
server/workstation=2k3

|Drew|

#3 User is offline   cspm2003 

  • the force is strong in this one...
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 03:30 PM

If all your hardware is compatible with server2k3 I would use it. I think its alot faster and more stable than WinXP. The only problem that I ever had with it, is that my video card isn't fully supported, and doesn't support direct 3d and all that, so I went back to windows 2000

#4 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 03:34 PM

cspm2003, on Sep 7 2003, 10:30 PM, said:

If all your hardware is compatible with server2k3 I would use it. I think its alot faster and more stable than WinXP. The only problem that I ever had with it, is that my video card isn't fully supported, and doesn't support direct 3d and all that, so I went back to windows 2000

I did test win2k3 after i first posted this but i think there was a heat problem as my PC i very hot after some time.

#5 User is offline   cspm2003 

  • the force is strong in this one...
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:01 PM

ant it doesn't get that hot with xp?

#6 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:08 PM

cspm2003, on Sep 7 2003, 11:01 PM, said:

ant it doesn't get that hot with xp?

No XP works fine my PC was shipped with XP.

#7 User is offline   cspm2003 

  • the force is strong in this one...
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:27 PM

how big is the temp difference between the two?

#8 User is offline   crowman 

  • The True MACMAN
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 121
  • Joined: 03-June 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:44 PM

depending on what you are going to use it for I would personally go for XP :)

#9 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 04:45 PM

cspm2003, on Sep 7 2003, 11:27 PM, said:

how big is the temp difference between the two?

10/20 degress maybe more depands on what i am doing.

#10 User is offline   cazzman 

  • Arthritic Sheep
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 06-July 03

Posted 07 September 2003 - 07:00 PM

For games, xp.
server is built for servers.
Windows xp is more user-friendly, and the cost (assuming your buying it :) ) is a big difference.
Cazzman.

#11 User is offline   XTRALONG 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 20-July 03

Posted 08 September 2003 - 11:20 AM

win2k3!
i can do the same or better than XP!
GAMES / Appz / ALL
WIN2k3 0wnz y00
:)

#12 User is offline   cspm2003 

  • the force is strong in this one...
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 08 September 2003 - 09:37 PM

XP is just to slow. I'd rather have an more basic GUI but better performance

#13 User is offline   Aubs_UK 

  • (",)
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 11-September 03

  Posted 13 September 2003 - 05:49 AM

For Server/Client, W2K3 :)

For Workstation, W2K :rolleyes:

#14 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 13 September 2003 - 01:05 PM

Aubs_UK, on Sep 13 2003, 12:49 PM, said:

For Server/Client, W2K3  :D

For Workstation, W2K  :rolleyes:

You no that sign you got there that My IP Address.

:) :rolleyes: :D :D

#15 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 13 September 2003 - 01:20 PM

[quote name='Terminator3' date='Sep 13 2003, 08:05 PM'] [size=4]For Workstation, W2K[/size] :D [/QUOTE]
You no that sign you got there that My IP Address.

:) :rolleyes: :D :D [/quote]
:rolleyes: You're the only one seeing it, nobody else. I see my own IP in that sign too, its just a generated GD image. :rolleyes:

#16 User is offline   Sunil 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 596
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 13 September 2003 - 08:54 PM

I would definitly recommend windows xp pro, because it has many new features and would really benefit and complement the pc.............

#17 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 15 September 2003 - 09:56 AM

[quote name='AaronXP' date='Sep 13 2003, 08:20 PM'] [quote name='Terminator3' date='Sep 13 2003, 08:05 PM'] [size=4]For Workstation, W2K[/size] :D [/QUOTE]
You no that sign you got there that My IP Address.

:) :rolleyes: :D :D [/QUOTE]
:rolleyes: You're the only one seeing it, nobody else. I see my own IP in that sign too, its just a generated GD image. :rolleyes: [/quote]
I see

lol..... :rolleyes:

#18 User is offline   DaveXP 

  • The One
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,295
  • Joined: 15-July 03

Posted 15 September 2003 - 09:57 AM

Sunil, on Sep 14 2003, 03:54 AM, said:

I would definitly recommend windows xp pro, because it has many new features and would really benefit and complement the pc.............

Yep i already got XP Pro just thought about asking to see if people think about win2k3 but thanks for the advice on which one.

:)

#19 User is offline   Skyfrog 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 10-September 03

Posted 15 September 2003 - 06:43 PM

I ordered the evaluation copy of 2003 just to play around with it, and here's what I thought. It does make a very fast and stable workstation, but it's a lot of work to get it set up properly. Meanwhile XP is also very fast and stable once you turn off visual styles and some useless services. Once both operating systems are set up properly I really don't see much difference in speed and stability. One thing that 2003 has going against it right now is driver support. Intellipoint will not install on it, and some of my other hardware was a bit flaky. Sure it makes a great OS for gaming but better than XP? Not really in my opinion. Bottom line to me, it just is not worth the trouble to set up as a workstation, and it's not as well supported as XP for consumer type programs and hardware. Throw in the fact that it costs a LOT of money (for those who still pay for their software these days) and it's a no brainer.

Stick with Windows XP.

#20 User is offline   dynamism 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 16-September 03

Posted 17 September 2003 - 12:53 AM

I installed 2k3 on my brand new laptop. I found certified drivers for all hardware.

What I had was a very fast and stable OS, and I only found one thing, but that made me go back to WinXpPro:

When ever I start a movie, using WMP9, it would take a long time to start playing. This I could live with. But the next time I wanted to start the program, nothing happened, exept explorer.exe went to 100% CPU usage and I had to reboot. :)

Share this topic:


  • 7 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy