WPI 5.2 Wish List For the future
#1
Posted 04 July 2006 - 01:07 PM
#2
Posted 07 July 2006 - 07:51 AM
Although I use a category install I still add install order numbers to keep track. I think you could probably do away with the Config Lister aswell if you implement this.
2. I don't know If you can do this but could there be a mini header for each catagory thats installing, not a biggie if you can't but it would be nice.
This post has been edited by kof94: 13 July 2006 - 02:45 PM
#3
Posted 09 July 2006 - 04:01 AM
i'd like to see 2 new features in wpi:
1) a checkbox in application configuration pale to disable a specific entry. at present i'm able to do that using the "flase" keyword in condition entry, but i think it would be more pratical and less mnemonical with a little checkbox
2) i have a couple of apps that force my system to rebbot... no flag can avoid this. but i'd like to add them to wpi, to give the opportunity to install. what i'm asking is a flag that make a entry not selected even if a user choose "select all". so i can install thos apps manually with wpi but i must not fear that a user can select it if i choose "select all"
thanks for your job
sonica
#4
Posted 10 July 2006 - 12:51 AM
#6
Posted 10 July 2006 - 03:46 PM
- In the percentbar of the install dialog the percentage of each program should be proportional to the file size of the invoked setup (for example office should have a much bigger range on the percentbar than small programs like emule)
- If possible a smooth percentbar animation, instead of the percentbar jumping from a value to another.
- The ability of forcing all the windows opened by certain setups to stay minimized in background this can be done by tracking the handle that calls each process.
- The "Begin install" button on the bottom-right side, like it is in the wizard that appear after windows has installed.
- Windows installer integration with the install dialog to show what is currently the windows installer doing(this requires windows installer messages parsing and I don't know how hard it is to implement, see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default....r_messages.asp)
#7
Posted 11 July 2006 - 03:28 PM
#8
Posted 11 July 2006 - 04:16 PM
#9
Posted 11 July 2006 - 05:24 PM
#10
Posted 11 July 2006 - 05:49 PM
bober, on Jul 11 2006, 10:28 PM, said:
IE can be launched as standalone but I think that including IE binaries inside WPI archive would violate just a few hundred copyright laws.
#11
Posted 12 July 2006 - 04:08 PM
mshta.exe wpi.hta
That will launch it.
#12
Posted 13 July 2006 - 03:54 PM
the next entries will be ignored (+/- execute after ??)
2. on topic : maybe for 5.3 , but
if we have tool tips , why cannot see them in install window ???
...somewhere somehow... i have 1024x768 pixels
if a program is installed , during this,
its tool tips can be showed, somewhere the text , someelse the image...
3. on topic : a scrolled window pointed to a file info_ro, info_en..., in lang golder (or other names)
info_xx , containing tips ... like
Quote
<td width="235" valign="top" nowrap>
position of this window : Interface tab ( a lot of space there).
#13
Posted 13 July 2006 - 10:06 PM
The tool tips in the installer: I doubt it. If you don't mind using extra space for a text box to show the tips (not a true tool tip popup), then possibly. But not reallyh necessary since it is supposed to be "unattended".
I am not sure what you mean in #3. More details.
#14
Posted 14 July 2006 - 11:53 AM
e.g.
use wpi_600.htm for 800x600
use wpi_768.htm for 1024x768
use wpi.htm if wpi_xxx.htm not exist
This post has been edited by billjrm: 14 July 2006 - 12:10 PM
#15
Posted 15 July 2006 - 04:53 AM
billjrm, on Jul 14 2006, 10:53 AM, said:
e.g.
use wpi_600.htm for 800x600
use wpi_768.htm for 1024x768
use wpi.htm if wpi_xxx.htm not exist
What would be the purpose of this when you can program all of the changes and values for each resolution into one wpi.htm...
#16
Posted 15 July 2006 - 04:54 AM
Think at FOOOD, a good creator of art. http://www.iconaholi.../downloads.html
Scroll down and see the arts. This will WPI look newer and better (even itsnt better
Or are there people who dislike this art?
Edit: i have take a look in the themestopic. I really like the jh_2000 Ultimatetheme (for this moment it will be the standard theme in my WPI). But i like to see more artistic themes like foood do.
This post has been edited by Solid as a rock: 15 July 2006 - 05:10 AM
#17
Posted 15 July 2006 - 10:42 AM
Themes | +--- Glossy (dir) | +--- default (dir) | +--- 600 (dir) | +--- 768 (dir) . .
I consider that there will be many duplicate files, so I reduce to "different wpi.htm for different resoulation".
Now I feel that "different wpi.htm for different resoulation" is not a good idea and "different theme for different resolution" is my wish.
Kelsenellenelvian, on Jul 15 2006, 04:53 AM, said:
It's OK to do this, but structure of this wpi.htm will not be same as the current provided wpi.htm.
I think the general form of this wpi.htm will be complicated, so "wpi.htm per resoulation" is easyer to accomplish.
This post has been edited by billjrm: 15 July 2006 - 10:51 AM
#18
Posted 15 July 2006 - 05:56 PM
The best way to avoid this is to keep using the table that Glossy is based on. Put your title up at top, the bottom bar at the bottom, and your wallpaper in the center <td> frame. Then only the widths will be changed, not the heights, of the top and bottom bars. The main display will scale x,y but should affect how the MediaPlayer blends in, for example.
So, if you line up elements vertically then you can not use one huge wallpaper. Break it up into pieces and use the table.
#19
Posted 19 July 2006 - 11:03 AM
This post has been edited by wixfigura: 19 July 2006 - 11:04 AM
#20
Posted 20 July 2006 - 08:48 AM



Help

Back to top









