foy Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 (edited) 5.6 on new computer buildProcessor - 5.9Memory - 5.9Graphics - 5.9Gaming - 5.6Hard disk - 5.9Foymemory went up to a 5.9 (fixed timings) Edited November 5, 2007 by foy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biohead Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 Got a nice cheap desktop now... 4.3Processor - 4.9Memory - 4.5Graphics - 4.3Gaming - 4.5Hard disk - 5.9Not bad for £194? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deda Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 3.6, thanks to ATI9600 256Mb (3.7 Graphics / 3.6 Gaming); P4 2.8Ghz (3.9); 1Gb RAM DDR 333Mhz (4.1); HD Samsung (5.3). It fits what I need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoxking Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 get 3.4 in Build 5536. Then installed build 5384 and upgraded to build 5536, now only getting 3.2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotteq Posted November 4, 2007 Share Posted November 4, 2007 (edited) Q6600 on a DFI P35 mobo. 8/400 multis, memory 1:1, 7200.11 HDD Edited November 4, 2007 by Scotteq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblabs Posted November 5, 2007 Share Posted November 5, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rutix Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Processor: 5.2Memory: 5.4Graphics:5.9Gaming graphics: 5.9Hard disk: 5.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb2528 Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Does anyone care? As long as it runs what you want it to run does it really matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajua Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 tha main goal of vista's performance index is to provide casual users with a score so they can understand how well (this is very subjective to me) that particular computer is performing.also it was designed to provide application setups and/or programs an easy way to check for hardware requirements. but the editing of an xml file renders this feature useless.here's my score to comply with this thread: 5.7 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb2528 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 tha main goal of vista's performance index is to provide casual users with a score so they can understand how well (this is very subjective to me) that particular computer is performing.also it was designed to provide application setups and/or programs an easy way to check for hardware requirements. but the editing of an xml file renders this feature useless.here's my score to comply with this thread: 5.7 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.4I agree that it was designed to provide application setups etc with information but do we really need people asking/telling what their particular score is? They really need to get out more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajua Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 we all probably need more time off...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergejk Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 (edited) Hi!Here we are ... Edited January 27, 2008 by sergejk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The008 Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 (edited) I got 3,4, thanks to my onboard video card (but mine is notebook), but I'm loving this notebook anyway!cya! Edited January 28, 2008 by The008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blinkdt Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 5.6 here on Vista Business x64. Good news is that I can go 45nm Quad when they become available and could always pop in a different graphics card. 5.9 is the top rating available at this time, if I understand correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew932 Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 Not bad I suppose, better than I thought on some of them. Runs smoothley so I'm not worried.Sais I can upgrade to 64-bit. Any idea how I would go about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now