cable signal keeps dropping
#1
Posted 30 September 2006 - 10:10 PM
#2
Posted 30 September 2006 - 10:22 PM
Your problem might be different, though...I've also heard of this happening with a loose/frayed/bad cable run or connection somewhere in the line (might not be in your house).
#3
Posted 30 September 2006 - 11:06 PM
#4
Posted 01 October 2006 - 07:30 AM
#5
Posted 01 October 2006 - 11:08 AM
#7
Posted 15 December 2006 - 07:13 PM
I'd be tempted to blame the router though. Especially if you're putting any kind of load on it. They overheat and do exactly that. Drop for short periods of time every now and then. The switch chips in most routers nowadays are plain ghetto (when that happens you get a "cable disconnected" trayicon and can't see your other PCs), and the router part also tends to overheat and cause problems. I had so much problems like that with every router I've tried, until the day I decided I had enough of it, and wasn't going to waste anymore time and money on routers (using software NAT/firewall instead now). Problems solved since then. But it could also be a bad NIC, driver or ethernet cable.
#8
Posted 16 December 2006 - 10:45 AM
This post has been edited by ringfinger: 16 December 2006 - 10:45 AM
#9
Posted 16 December 2006 - 12:18 PM
#10
Posted 16 December 2006 - 12:56 PM
jcarle, on Dec 16 2006, 02:18 PM, said:
I haven't bothered to ask, because I've had such issues with like a dozen different routers, DLink, Linksys 9yes, including the "good" WRT54G), Neatgear and others. Routers suck, period (except for ppl with "simple" needs). I've even put HSFs on some of them, and they still couldn't handle it. Yet, any software solution I've tried since then has worked perfectly, be it RRAS, Sieve, Winroute, m0n0wall, etc. No matter what router it is, I'd still think it's the culprit. Could be interesting to know though...
#11
Posted 16 December 2006 - 01:49 PM
crahak, on Dec 16 2006, 01:56 PM, said:
I think you've just been unlucky.
#12
Posted 16 December 2006 - 04:27 PM
jcarle, on Dec 16 2006, 03:49 PM, said:
Unlucky so many times with that many different routers? A dozen+ lemons in a row? Impossible.
I think you're just not putting enough stress on your connection. Lend me your WRT54G and it won't last 2 weeks
#13
Posted 16 December 2006 - 05:15 PM
crahak, on Dec 16 2006, 05:27 PM, said:
I think you're just not putting enough stress on your connection. Lend me your WRT54G and it won't last 2 weeks
I put my router and modem under heavy use daily, I seed multi-GB torrents and I'm constantly downloading multi-GB torrents. I easily hit double digit GB download bandwidth usage, usually downloading up to 25 torrents simultaneously with uTorrent set to a 100 connections per torrent and 1000 total connection limit. Not to mention that I have the half-open connections patch applied to my windows set to unlimited. So I'm fairly certain that my router is under heavy use... oh and lest I forget, my wife also runs through the router under heavy use through the wireless since she likes to leave her laptop on for days on end to download a multitude of things through Shareaza.
Perhaps it's the other way around, maybe I got lucky.
#14
Posted 16 December 2006 - 05:32 PM
But I just had to add my opinion on the matter in response to this:
crahak, on Dec 16 2006, 11:27 PM, said:
What kind of connection are you using?
I had a 100/100 Mbit fibre-lan connection (we really do have such fast connections in Sweden for regular consumers) both down- and uploading a lot more than that a day with my D-Link GamerLounge DGL-4100. I cannot remember having any problems with it, using it more or less full time for a year. My old Netgear RP614v2 needed reboots a few times a day under the same load.
The D-Link is almost three times as expensive as other consumer routers, but then again it really does work very well.
#15
Posted 16 December 2006 - 05:37 PM
jcarle, on Dec 16 2006, 07:15 PM, said:
Torrents alone is not too bad (no matter what the bandwidth is). Now keep doing that, but add ed2k+kad on top of that (without limiting connections to something too low; I've got an old 200GB'er just for ed2k temp files) and your router will fry pretty quickly! Most routers are nowhere near able to handle the simultaneous NAT sessions required either.
Add ngs, ftp/http downloads (and uploads) on top of that, several ports forwarded for various stuff, mirroring the odd website (winhttrack), VPNs, VOiP, IRC, the average web surfing and all... It'll work fine for a week, then you'll quickly start having to reset it almost everyday (cheap processor heats too much and crashes), until it becomes eventually useless (bugs too much, DHCP from your ISP stops working for no apparent reason, etc - even if you update firmware, reset defaults and all).
Honestly, I wish I had never even bothered. Anything software-based I've tried to replace 'em so far has worked great and usually has more features.
#16
Posted 16 December 2006 - 05:59 PM
#17
Posted 16 December 2006 - 06:28 PM
@jcarle: Yeah, it's stretching the topic a bit. Sure his problem might be router related, but that can be easily tested by unplugging it and connecting directly to the cable modem.
Edit: Removed "quite" in the above response to jcarle. You're right TAiN I was using the wrong word, it's slightly (and not "quite a bit") OT.
This post has been edited by DL.: 17 December 2006 - 05:15 PM
#18
Posted 17 December 2006 - 02:50 AM
I've had similar luck as jcarle: wrt*+thibor is good stuff. But I've had other, less awesome consumer routers go to their knees quickly as crahak noted. But I don't run the same traffic as either of them.
So....you know any dirty jokes?
#19
Posted 17 December 2006 - 04:20 PM
#20
Posted 18 December 2006 - 03:38 AM



Help


Back to top










