[soporific]

NativeTexan, on Dec 12 2006, 06:31 AM, said:

I am attempting to install the SecurityUpDates for IE v6 but when attempting to do the "Ie6upd.exe" it tells me I need to have the IE v6 first. I do have it installed on my system with SP1 and internet tools. SYSInfo shows "IE 5 6.0.2800.1106" where should I start?

Quick reply: this happens quite a bit with other hotfixes ... it happens when MS has a dodgy method for checking if the update is needed or not. If it doesn't pass whatever test it has setup, it gives that message about needing IE6 installed.

I'll look into this a bit more and report back...

[NativeTexan]

Soporific,

Thank you for this reply and for looking into some of these difficulties I am having. I have just about given-up on making these installs for IEv6.0 and the others for Win98SE so I can get the "98SE2XP" installed. Have considered just staying with the "98SE2ME" because of those problems. My system is so old and slow that these more modern, HA, HA, versions of these softwares and updates from Microsoft are such a HASSEL to complete, for one, and more of a hassel to download from Microsoft. When Mozilla FireFox is so much better, faster, more, secure, tabbing, etceteras.

I know you people are working with Microsoft software and are keeping it updated for us and I do appreciate this as I am one of those that is stuck in 'limbo' and cannot afford to acquire a faster, stronger, more efficient, better computer or the software.

When I finally win the Lotto, cannot afford that either, I will be out of your hair and into better everythingy.

Thank you for your efforts and reading my posts,

[soporific]

NativeTexan, on Dec 12 2006, 10:52 PM, said:

Thank you for your efforts and reading my posts,

no worries ... am still looking into your original issue ...

new additions:

13th Dec 2006:
Added to main list: kb886677, kb928939, Servic9x

This post has been edited by soporific: 12 December 2006 - 11:08 PM

[MDGx]

soporific:

Late today [12-12-2006] I've posted new updates [just to create more work for you ]:
http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=46581

HTH

______________________________


NativeTexan:

I have just released the new unified 98MP10 [installs all files from 98SE2XP + 98SEMP10]:
http://www.mdgx.com/wmp.htm#98MP10
So no need to install 98SE2XP nor 98SEMP10 = they are both obsolete now.

HTH

[soporific]

MDGx, on Dec 13 2006, 03:06 PM, said:

soporific:
Late today [12-12-2006] I've posted new updates [just to create more work for you ]:
http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=46581

Actually, thanks for the post --- i've had your latest updates page open all day but it was the earlier version - i wouldn't have seen the additions for days !! -- maybe you saw that I was looking at the page and thought that I hadn't refreshed.... well, you were right!! Good on you for posting ...

[NativeTexan]

MDGx, on Dec 13 2006, 12:06 AM, said:

Snip snip nippity nip nip,

NativeTexan:

I have just released the new unified 98MP10 [installs all files from 98SE2XP + 98SEMP10]:
http://www.mdgx.com/wmp.htm#98MP10
So no need to install 98SE2XP nor 98SEMP10 = they are both obsolete now.

HTH

MDGx,

Thank you for this information, would I need to un-install the copy of "98SE2ME" that I presently have on my system? I do not have the "98SE2MP10" installed, have been using just the MP v9.0.

My main problem has been the IE v6.0 SP1/w Internet Tools will not download most of the updates needed for IE or Win98SE.

I too thank you for this post and "soporific" for his post as well, check my e-mail two or three times aday while attempting to do a little (cough, hack) reading?

Thank you for reading my post,

[MDGx]

NativeTexan, on Dec 13 2006, 08:10 AM, said:

Thank you for this information, would I need to un-install the copy of "98SE2ME" that I presently have on my system? I do not have the "98SE2MP10" installed, have been using just the MP v9.0.

There is no such thing as 98SE2MP10.
If you are referring to 98SEMP10...
98SE2ME is completely different than 98SE2XP or 98SEMP10 or 98MP10.

Please see the readme text files for details on what each one does:
98SE2ME:
http://www.mdgx.com/9s2m/READ1ST.TXT
98MP10:
http://www.mdgx.com/98mp10/98MP10.TXT
98SE2XP:
http://www.mdgx.com/982xp/98SE2XP.TXT
98SEMP10:
http://www.mdgx.com/...10/98SEMP10.TXT

HTH [Hope This Helps]

[NativeTexan]

MDGx, on Dec 13 2006, 05:32 PM, said:

NativeTexan, on Dec 13 2006, 08:10 AM, said:

Thank you for this information, would I need to un-install the copy of "98SE2ME" that I presently have on my system? I do not have the "98SE2MP10" installed, have been using just the MP v9.0.

There is no such thing as 98SE2MP10.
If you are referring to 98SEMP10...
98SE2ME is completely different than 98SE2XP or 98SEMP10 or 98MP10.

Please see the readme text files for details on what each one does:
98SE2ME:
http://www.mdgx.com/9s2m/READ1ST.TXT
98MP10:
http://www.mdgx.com/98mp10/98MP10.TXT
98SE2XP:
http://www.mdgx.com/982xp/98SE2XP.TXT
98SEMP10:
http://www.mdgx.com/...10/98SEMP10.TXT

HTH [Hope This Helps]

This is a result of NOT knowing what I am talking about nor knowing the names of these files. Yes, you are so very correct and I have done that, referenced those locations and now have thingys in control. I have figured out what I had done wrong and corrected that. After re-reading the install instructions several times it became clear and all is under control to charge forward.

I did an now have installed the "98MP10" that includes the MPlayer v10 and "98SE2XP".

I also wish to thank you for taking the time out of your day to respond to my DUMB question. If I had just read and re-read several times it would have been alright, I did not and posted that stupid question. Most of the time you probably can answer my questions by saying, "read the instructions, read the instructions, read the instructions, and when you are done read the instructions." Unfortunately I am one of those that needs the instructions on the bottom of the heal to be able to clear any liquid inside of my boot. If you know what I mean!

Thank you so very much for reading and taking the time to send me a message,

[PROBLEMCHYLD]

Q925051 Jet 4.0 fix. replaces Q918144 patch

[soporific]

4th Jan, 2007:
Added to main list: PNGFIX (by Tihiy)


A note: just because I don't post a new message, doesn't mean the list isn't being updated. Sometimes I am just too busy ...

[Eck]

NativeTexan,

Please DO NOT install the Microsoft Security Updates Cd. That thing installs some outdated stuff and changes the version of 98SE so some newer updates (and programs) won't recognize the proper version of Windows so will refuse to install.

That was one of the reasons it was discontinued a long time ago.

The auto-patcher gives you the working updates without the obsolete stuff. And all the latest available security fixes as well.

[winxpi]

Quote

Rootsup --- 2006 Sep 08 - 233kb - dl I - Root Certificate Update

What I still haven't found out is ,how do I find out if a new Rootsupdate is released?

This post has been edited by winxpi: 04 January 2007 - 10:46 PM

[NativeTexan]

Eck, on Jan 4 2007, 12:17 AM, said:

NativeTexan,

Please DO NOT install the Microsoft Security Updates Cd. That thing installs some outdated stuff and changes the version of 98SE so some newer updates (and programs) won't recognize the proper version of Windows so will refuse to install.

That was one of the reasons it was discontinued a long time ago.

The auto-patcher gives you the working updates without the obsolete stuff. And all the latest available security fixes as well.

"ECK,"

Thank you for this advice, I do NOT have the MSSecUpdt CD so that is not a problem for me. I may not be on here very often as I am working on another "PutToGetherFromManyOtherPutToGegthers" and 'SomeCanibalizedSystems', they are in the range of approximately 6 -7 years old. PLUS, attempting to do some other work on this one without crashing it so I can still get on the web.

I am NOT sophisticated enough to have any updated software on a CD, all of mine are OEMs at about 7 - 8 years old. The only thingys I have are downloaded from the web. At this time NOT really sure what I have to install, that will be worked out later.

Thank you for everythingy and will be back very seldom for maybe the next 3-4 weeks or maybe even a month or two,

[Drugwash]

Soporific, you may wanna replace NUSB23e with NUSB24, unless there's a strong reason to keep the older version on the list (can't see any reason though).
Keep it up! ;-)

[soporific]

12th Jan, 2007:
Added to main list: kb929969 (replaces kb925486), Shell98, kb929120, W98MP10, kb925398, kb926247 (replaces q314147)
Moved to obsolete list: kb925486, kb928939, kb928388, q314147
Updated in main list: NUSB24 (replaces NUSB23e)
New versions of files: ScanFrag, Copy2Gb, Shell98 (the list didn't need changing but the files are newer)

This post has been edited by soporific: 11 January 2007 - 05:53 PM

[NativeTexan]

soporific, on Jan 11 2007, 05:44 PM, said:

12th Jan, 2007:
Added to main list: kb929969 (replaces kb925486), Shell98, kb929120, W98MP10, kb925398, kb926247 (replaces q314147)
Moved to obsolete list: kb925486, kb928939, kb928388, q314147
Updated in main list: NUSB24 (replaces NUSB23e)
New versions of files: ScanFrag, Copy2Gb, Shell98 (the list didn't need changing but the files are newer)

"soporific,"

You are doing the right thingy, by me anyways, as this list is what I needed to make a stab at moving ahead. You do not know how much you have HELPed me. Now to see if Microsoft will allow me to download these files, updates, hotfixes, whatever.

Thank you for reading my posty-toastie,

[pcalvert]

BTW, some of the links in the list are broken. For example, here are two:

http://www.mdgx.com/files/IE918899.EXE
http://www.mdgx.com/files/OE911567.EXE

There may be others, as I only checked a few of them.

Phil

[pcalvert]

soporific, on Oct 19 2006, 01:19 AM, said:

kb925454 - 2006 Dec 12 -- 2.02mb - dl I - Unofficial Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 sp1

kb918899 - 2006 Sep 12 - 3.6mb - dl I - info2 - Unofficial Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 sp1

Since these are both cumulative security updates for Internet Explorer 6 SP1, does that mean that the release of KB925454 has made the KB918899 update obsolete?

Phil

[MDGx]

pcalvert, on Jan 13 2007, 02:42 PM, said:

BTW, some of the links in the list are broken. For example, here are two:

http://www.mdgx.com/files/IE918899.EXE
http://www.mdgx.com/files/OE911567.EXE

There may be others, as I only checked a few of them.

Phil

pcalvert, on Jan 14 2007, 10:22 AM, said:

soporific, on Oct 19 2006, 01:19 AM, said:

kb925454 - 2006 Dec 12 -- 2.02mb - dl I - Unofficial Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 sp1

kb918899 - 2006 Sep 12 - 3.6mb - dl I - info2 - Unofficial Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 sp1

Since these are both cumulative security updates for Internet Explorer 6 SP1, does that mean that the release of KB925454 has made the KB918899 update obsolete?

Phil

Yes, those updates are obsolete.
That's why the links are broken = it's on purpose.

Yes, KB918899 is obsolete, was replaced with IE925454.EXE .

Current cumulative fixes always here:
IE:
http://www.mdgx.com/ietoy.htm#IEC
OE:
http://www.mdgx.com/ietoy.htm#OEC

HTH

[soporific]

MDGx, on Jan 16 2007, 07:57 AM, said:

pcalvert, on Jan 13 2007, 02:42 PM, said:

BTW, some of the links in the list are broken. For example, here are two:

Thanks for replying for me MDGx, I'll update the list ASAP