MSFN Forum: HOTFIXES: Win2000 SP4, WinXP SP2, WinXP SP3 and Win2003 SP2 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 21 Pages +
  • « First
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

HOTFIXES: Win2000 SP4, WinXP SP2, WinXP SP3 and Win2003 SP2 Under New Management! Rate Topic: -----

#201 User is offline   Octopuss 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: 31-January 07

Posted 01 July 2007 - 11:42 PM

I have a question:

All the updates for IE6 are not listed here, right?
I have a slight problem with that - I hate IE7 and don't even install it. I use Opera instead and only open IE for pages that don't work in Opera at all. So: is there any possibility to list updates for IE separately and include the IE6 ones as well, please? Pretty please?

Also: when I see in changes that some updates were removed, does that mean they no longer are of any use or are included in some new ones? Will it create any problems if I just keep adding the new ones and keep the old ones still?


#202 User is offline   Glenn9999 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 23-April 07

Posted 02 July 2007 - 08:13 AM

Usually the IE6/IE7 patches are just folded into the pile as XP patches. I usually try to mark them separately to indicate what they are. Here's the list of what I have.

IE6-WindowsXP-KB929969-x86-ENU.exe
IE6-WindowsXP-KB933566-x86-ENU.exe
IE7-WindowsXP-KB928090-x86-enu.exe
IE7-WindowsXP-KB929969-x86-enu.exe
IE7-WindowsXP-KB931768-x86-enu.exe
IE7-WindowsXP-KB933566-x86-ENU.exe

Quote

when I see in changes that some updates were removed, does that mean they no longer are of any use or are included in some new ones?


Usually if you see an update removed out of a list, it's recognized that the update is old. Or, a newer patch includes the changes in the older patch.

Quote

Will it create any problems if I just keep adding the new ones and keep the old ones still?


No.

#203 User is offline   the_guy 

  • Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 901
  • Joined: 15-July 05
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 02 July 2007 - 12:18 PM

@Glenn: You hit everything on the nose. However, 2 of your IE7 patches are replaced. KB928090 is the cumulative update from February and KB931768 is the one from May. Both are replaced by KB933566.

the_guy

#204 User is offline   Glenn9999 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 23-April 07

Posted 02 July 2007 - 04:23 PM

View Postthe_guy, on Jul 2 2007, 01:18 PM, said:

@Glenn: You hit everything on the nose. However, 2 of your IE7 patches are replaced. KB928090 is the cumulative update from February and KB931768 is the one from May. Both are replaced by KB933566.


I double-checked and agree with you about KB931768. However, KB928090 is required, as Microsoft made a big error in not including a file in the IE7 package in subsequent packages for it to be considered as "completely replaced".

corpol.dll is in:
KB928090-IE7 7.0.6000.16414
KB928090-IE7 7.0.6000.16414 7.00.6000.16414

(the first column is the update version and the second is the version of the file in the system (in this case windows/system32)

See
http://www.neowin.net/forum/lofiversion/in...hp/t559309.html

and also the post of: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:52 AM by Michael Kraft at http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2007/05/0...w.aspx#comments

I find no indication that this file was rendered non-relevant, though I notice that Microsoft went and took out corpol.dll from 928090. Is the file rendered useless?

Of course, there are certain files only updated in the IE6 packages that seem to get used in IE7 (browseui.dll and shdocvw.dll) which still seem to be available to the end user (they're in windows/system32 after an upgrade to IE7). It'd be nice to get some answers, or at least some consistency. Right now it seems it's required for one to uninstall IE7 entirely and then update IE6 and then reinstall IE7 & updates to be fully updated. Silly, but seems true.

This post has been edited by Glenn9999: 02 July 2007 - 04:31 PM


#205 User is offline   ckislam 

  • Islam Adel
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: 04-September 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 07 July 2007 - 11:10 AM

Hello, i was planning to make a website containing all windows updates with direct download link from Microsoft.
Do you think it is allowed?? :blushing:

thanks

#206 User is offline   Glenn9999 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 588
  • Joined: 23-April 07

Posted 10 July 2007 - 10:17 PM

I just got three files today through Windows Update for Windows XP SP2.

928365 and 928366 are updates for .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0. You can get the appropriate update for what you're running here:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/...n/ms07-040.mspx

Then of course, 890830 shows up every month.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en

#207 User is offline   oneless 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 07-January 05

Posted 11 July 2007 - 12:44 AM

View PostGlenn9999, on Jul 11 2007, 07:17 AM, said:

I just got three files today through Windows Update for Windows XP SP2.

928365 and 928366 are updates for .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0. You can get the appropriate update for what you're running here:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/...n/ms07-040.mspx

Then of course, 890830 shows up every month.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en

for KB928365 and KB928366 the proper switch is /q

also here , on an intel sistem i have a new critical KB936357

#208 User is offline   rickytheanuj 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 261
  • Joined: 09-April 07

Posted 11 July 2007 - 09:30 AM

Can i use registry tweak as hotfix? Will it change my registry successfully?

#209 User is offline   rickytheanuj 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 261
  • Joined: 09-April 07

Posted 11 July 2007 - 09:31 AM

Can i use registry tweak (exe converted) as hotfix? Will it change my registry successfully? -using nlite.

#210 User is offline   the_guy 

  • Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 901
  • Joined: 15-July 05
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 12 July 2007 - 05:20 AM

List has been updated, and a lot earlier than last month too!

the_guy

#211 User is offline   xyu 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 04-November 04

Posted 12 July 2007 - 09:28 AM

Great thanks for the update, at least one person was waiting for it ^^
What about the kb923689 patch for XP, published on the 10th of july, is it the same as the kb925398-v2 ?
There's something I don't understand.

This post has been edited by xyu: 12 July 2007 - 09:29 AM


#212 User is offline   SwedenXP 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 226
  • Joined: 28-September 03

Posted 12 July 2007 - 09:36 AM

@ the_guy Thanx for the update!

Just out of curiosity... where did You find the "Removed KB885626 for WinXP SP2" info?

Big thanx in advance from a very wet Sweden...

/SwedenXP B)

#213 User is offline   the_guy 

  • Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 901
  • Joined: 15-July 05
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 12 July 2007 - 10:03 AM

It's replaced by KB936357, which is in the mandatory updates section. I believe the update just shows up for people with Intel processors.

the_guy

#214 User is offline   SwedenXP 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 226
  • Joined: 28-September 03

Posted 12 July 2007 - 10:04 AM

Ahaa - now I see.

Thanx for a very quick answer!

/SwedenXP B)

#215 User is offline   TheCrowX 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 24-July 04

Posted 13 July 2007 - 07:33 AM

hi everyboy
@ the_guy isn t KB927891 a critical hotfix as it shows up in the windows update listed as a critical one ?
also this one is a bit old but shows as a critical one KB929399
Thanx in advance

This post has been edited by TheCrowX: 13 July 2007 - 07:39 AM


#216 User is offline   Nilfred 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 210
  • Joined: 18-September 04

Posted 14 July 2007 - 06:53 AM

Obsolete: NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe
Replaced by: NDP1.1sp1-KB928366-X86.exe

#217 User is offline   straffin 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 26-April 04

Posted 17 July 2007 - 01:56 PM

Hey there...

Very first item in the XPSP2 list has an error

Quote

KB939373 -› Vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Information Services Could Allow Remote Code Execution
Download -› 621 KB (July 9, 2007)
Switches: KB99373.exe /q /n /z

The exe in the "Switches" line is missing a character; should be KB939... not KB99...

(edit)
Last-ish item too:

Quote

KB936357 -› A microcode reliability update is available that improves the reliability of systems that use Intel processors
Download -› 692 KB (June 11, 2007)
Switches: KB885626.exe /q /n /z

Wrong exe.

This post has been edited by straffin: 17 July 2007 - 02:10 PM


#218 User is offline   Nucleus 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 267
  • Joined: 15-February 05

Posted 18 July 2007 - 08:13 AM

Hi,

Hotfix KB929399 links to hotfix KB927891 (http://www.microsoft...&DisplayLang=en)

#219 User is offline   simeruk 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 18-July 07

Posted 18 July 2007 - 11:07 AM

Hello all !

My first post here :)

I think that I`ve stumbled on a small error in the_guy`s list - namely:

Windows 2000 part of the list:

Download link doesn`t seem to work. I have posted corrected one below.

Quote

KB913580 -› Vulnerability in Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator Could Allow Denial of Service
Download -› 5.21 MB (May 9, 2006)
Switches: KB913580.exe /passive /norestart /quiet


http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en



Cheers !

#220 User is offline   the_guy 

  • Creator of the Windows ME Service Pack
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 901
  • Joined: 15-July 05
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 18 July 2007 - 11:48 AM

The bugs have been fixed. The KB913580 bug was just caused by an extra http://. The rest were by copying and pasting.

the_guy

Share this topic:


  • 21 Pages +
  • « First
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy