MSFN Forum: Silent .NET Maker (latest update: 20080603) - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

Welcome to the Applications Installs forum. Make sure you read the forum rules before you start posting.

Links/Requests to warez and/or any illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated.

We try our best to keep this forum clean of illegal content. If you see any illegal activity use the "report" button you find in every post to report the specific post to the moderators. If you ignore any of the rules you will be banned without notice.

Read Forum Rules
  • 19 Pages +
  • « First
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Silent .NET Maker (latest update: 20080603) Create silent switchless .NET installers for Win2K/XP/2K3 x86 Rate Topic: -----

#201 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 30 May 2008 - 12:31 PM

Updated again...
Fixed support for Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Portuguese and Portuguese Brazil language packs for .NET 2.0 SP1, .NET 3.0 SP1 and .NET 3.5.

@fric
You're welcome :)


#202 User is offline   ronmanp 

  • Lazy Hyperactive
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 04-September 05

Posted 30 May 2008 - 05:05 PM

wow good job !

I have a question... I made a merged switchless installer of .net 1.1+sp1 etc , + .net 3.5 + language packs and I understand I need to run it at runonceex or guilogon but will it show a progress bar ? Because the user wont know why the pc is working so hard.

ps: escuse my english lol

#203 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 01 June 2008 - 12:39 PM

Yes. I have even changed the installation method of the XML Paper Specification and the Windows Imaging Component updates (part of .NET 3.0) to passive so you can follow the progress on those as well.

#204 User is offline   Innocent Devil 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 632
  • Joined: 04-February 05

Posted 02 June 2008 - 12:05 PM

wen i use only dotnetfx.exe and dotnetfx53.exe with _SNM.ini having MERGE_FRAMEWORKS=12
it doent extract .NET 2.0 from dotnetfx35.exe and making DNF11_20.exe having .net 1.1 only! :-/

#205 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 03 June 2008 - 10:52 AM

You can now use dotnetfx.exe and dotnetfx35.exe with the latest version of SNM.

#206 User is offline   XibaD 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: 07-August 06

Posted 06 June 2008 - 11:26 AM

Little doubt here: Does DNF35.exe need to be installed at GUIRUNONCE too?

#207 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 07 June 2008 - 09:11 AM

I just tested .NET 3.0 SP1 at T-13 (hadn't done that yet) and it seems MS have fixed the problem with the WebClient service. But there are still quite a few errors in the Event Log so it's better to install it at first user logon. Consequently, .NET 3.5 will have to be installed at first user logon as well.

#208 User is offline   XibaD 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: 07-August 06

Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:04 PM

View PostTomcat76, on Jun 7 2008, 05:11 PM, said:

I just tested .NET 3.0 SP1 at T-13 (hadn't done that yet) and it seems MS have fixed the problem with the WebClient service. But there are still quite a few errors in the Event Log so it's better to install it at first user logon. Consequently, .NET 3.5 will have to be installed at first user logon as well.


Thanks TC!

#209 User is offline   Sydnelson 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 04-September 04

Posted 17 June 2008 - 03:07 AM

I have problems here at T13 install.

If I install .net 1.1 first then 3.0 and 3.5 don't install. And if I install 2.0 + 3.0 + 3.5 first the 1.1 don't install...

What I made wrong?

Files used:
dotnetfx.exe
langpack.exe (PT-BR)
NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe
NDP1.1sp1-KB928366-X86.exe
dotnetfx35.exe
dotnetfx35langpack_x86pt-BR.exe
Silent.NET Maker 20080603
Windows XP SP3 PT-BR

I try use FULL option to merge and try use separeted files without success...

This post has been edited by Sydnelson: 17 June 2008 - 03:12 AM


#210 User is offline   Tomcat76 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 17 June 2008 - 06:47 AM

View PostSydnelson, on Jun 17 2008, 11:07 AM, said:

If I install .net 1.1 first then 3.0 and 3.5 don't install.
You don't mention .NET 2.0 so I'll give a double answer.
1) .NET 3.0 requires .NET 2.0 to be installed first
2) As specified in the introduction thread, if you install .NET 1.1 first and then .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 can't be installed immediately afterwards because the combination of .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 causes Windows to report to other programs that .NET 2.0 isn't installed until the next reboot.

View PostSydnelson, on Jun 17 2008, 11:07 AM, said:

And if I install 2.0 + 3.0 + 3.5 first the 1.1 don't install...
Theoretically, this should've worked. But why are you trying this at T-13? .NET 3.0 SP1 and .NET 3.5 are not SVCPACK-compatible.

#211 User is offline   Sydnelson 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 04-September 04

Posted 17 June 2008 - 08:12 AM

View PostTomcat76, on Jun 17 2008, 06:47 AM, said:

You don't mention .NET 2.0 so I'll give a double answer.
1) .NET 3.0 requires .NET 2.0 to be installed first
2) As specified in the introduction thread, if you install .NET 1.1 first and then .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0 can't be installed immediately afterwards because the combination of .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 causes Windows to report to other programs that .NET 2.0 isn't installed until the next reboot.
1) Yes I install 2.0 before try install 3.0 and 3.5.
2)To avoid this windows report has a regtweak, right????

View PostTomcat76, on Jun 17 2008, 06:47 AM, said:

Theoretically, this should've worked. But why are you trying this at T-13? .NET 3.0 SP1 and .NET 3.5 are not SVCPACK-compatible.
I always use .Net Framework All in One x86 (incl 3.5) in T-13 stage with total success, now I'm testing Silent.net Maker to try avoid some errors in .Net 2.0 detection with some specific programs in my work before I install this framework package.

PS: sorry for my poor english...

#212 User is offline   kal 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 07-March 04

Posted 17 June 2008 - 11:03 AM

Hi there!

You made a nice job, congrats!
I would like to know if there's any hotfixes I should include for .NET 2.0SP1/3.0SP1/3.5 ? Because in your fist post, you just talk about hotfixes for .NET 1.1 SP1.

Cheers,
Kal

EDIT: Which .NET 1.1 SP1 version should I use? I can get an english and french versions on MS download center, and it seems that SNM handles correctly french redistributable package. But I prefer to be sure...

This post has been edited by kal: 17 June 2008 - 11:12 AM


#213 User is offline   willsion 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 18-May 05

Posted 23 June 2008 - 02:08 AM

Thank you.I have used it to make a little .net 1.1 installer(11M).

#214 User is offline   darafat 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 41
  • Joined: 21-December 06

Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:32 PM

oh yeah!
Really great job TomCat

:thumbup :thumbup
thanks so much man, it just works like a charm :hello:

Anyway, why if you run the script without any changes, and without including net 2.0 sp1 (where u said that it s not needed if the 3.5 is included) te sum of the outputs files is 1 mb more then if you include it lol :unsure:

p.s: we re waiting for the net compact v2 and v3 now :whistle:

thanks again :thumbup

This post has been edited by darafat: 23 June 2008 - 12:33 PM


#215 User is offline   Kiki Burgh 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,425
  • Joined: 06-January 06

Posted 10 August 2008 - 02:28 AM

hi tc! found out about the update to this just lately :) (thought this would've stopped at 3.0) ... though i've yet to try this, many thanks! :thumbup

#216 User is offline   TranceEnergy 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 963
  • Joined: 23-March 06

Posted 10 August 2008 - 05:30 AM

Hm i installed .net 3.5 successfully pre-login on nlited system a couple of months ago. No troubles, just keep printer service on automatic, and voila.
At least thats what i remember, wrote about it in kurt's x64 thread i think. or nlite what to not remove perhaps. I got memory like a goldfish, almost.

#217 User is offline   zorro1 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 81
  • Joined: 02-November 03

Posted 17 August 2008 - 11:05 AM

PB with net 3.5 sp1 and langpack 3.5 sp1

can't integrate langpack for net 3.0 code error 2728


and you ?

#218 User is offline   fz500 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: 28-December 03

Posted 22 August 2008 - 09:32 PM

Net 3.5 SP1 official version has been issued, the file name and 3.5 seems like it used integration, but also when they jumped out to extract a number of error messages, I do not know why

#219 User is offline   bigfatroundguy 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 04-May 05

  Posted 31 August 2008 - 07:44 AM

Nice!, I just tried the latest edition with default settings and it worked first time, totally clean. Am looking forward to the .NET 3.5 SP1 version. Many thx

#220 User is offline   DarkShadows 

  • The brighter the light, the darker the shadows.
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 270
  • Joined: 12-January 05

Posted 31 August 2008 - 08:12 PM

@Tomcat
I don't know if you have tested this (or if you even recommend it), but I just tried the following steps below.
  • Downloaded SNM.zip from 1st post in thread and extracted to my Work folder.
  • For .Net Framework 1.1, downloaded the following to my Work folder:
    • dotnetfx.exe
    • NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe
    • NDP1.1sp1-KB928366-X86.exe

  • For all other .Net Frameworks, downloaded Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 Full Redistributable Package to Work folder.
  • Skipped all language packs, since I speak English.
  • Left all SNM.ini settings at their default values.
  • Executed SNM.cmd.
    During SNM.cmd processing, I observed one item of concern. The Command Prompt displayed the error message: "The System could not find the file specified."
    Attached File  Error.png (27.42K)
    Number of downloads: 51
  • Installed DNF20.exe from svcpack.inf.
  • Installed DNF30.exe, DNF35.exe, and DNF11.exe from RunOnceEx (in that order).

I observed no errors during or after the installation, and Microsoft Update finds no required updates for .Net Framework.
EDIT: I should note that all items appear correctly installed in Control Panel.
Attached File  ControlPanel.png (27.33K)
Number of downloads: 41
Q1: Has anyone else attempted something similar? If so, has it worked for you?
Q2: Are the any concerns or issues with this approach?

This post has been edited by DarkShadows: 31 August 2008 - 08:17 PM


Share this topic:


  • 19 Pages +
  • « First
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy