MSFN Forum: WindowsXP Pro won't recognize 4GB of memory. - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Unattended CD/DVD Guide Homepage · MSFN Forum Rules

If you have questions about customizing Windows XP that are nLite-specific, please post them in the nLite forum, not here. If you have questions regarding the unattended installation of Windows XP, please post them in the Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003 section.
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

WindowsXP Pro won't recognize 4GB of memory. Upgraded my pc to 4x1GB dimms and system only shows 3GB. Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   cluberti 

  • Gustatus similis pullus
  • Group: Supervisor
  • Posts: 11,208
  • Joined: 09-September 01
  • OS:Windows RT
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 21 February 2007 - 11:10 AM

Vista x86 will also not see anything above 4GB - you need a higher-end server OS to use PAE on x86 (or just run x64).


#22 User is offline   nmX.Memnoch 

  • MSFN Master
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,086
  • Joined: 15-September 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 22 February 2007 - 12:55 AM

View Postcluberti, on Feb 21 2007, 12:22 AM, said:

View PostnmX.Memnoch, on Feb 11 2007, 10:48 AM, said:

But if you have a 64-bit capable processor, but 32-bit WinXP installed then WinXP will show the full 4GB.

Also not necessarily true - if the BIOS reports the 4GB memory address boundary as somewhere lower than 4GB, only a 64bit OS or a 32bit OS with PAE support will see most (but likely still not all) of the RAM. It has nothing to do with the OS, and everything to do with the underlying system hardware without regard to either a 32bit or 64bit processor. This issue is ENTIRELY a hardware issue - mostly BIOS, but also video RAM shadowing (we'll see more of this in Vista with higher-end cards becoming the norm) will cause RAM to not be available to the OS as well.

I wasn't entirely sure of that. The x64 capable machines that I've worked on that have 4GB RAM but 32-bit XP have all shown the full 4GB of RAM in System Properties. My experience with that has been pretty limited though...

#23 User is offline   TravisO 

  • Trouble Starter
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 284
  • Joined: 16-December 04

Posted 22 February 2007 - 02:20 PM

Well it wouldn't hurt to apply the latest bios & chipset flash to your motherboard. But I also have a 4GB setup and Task Manager only shows 3.5gb while msinfo32 does report I have 4GB.

#24 User is offline   Antartica 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 24-December 07

Posted 19 May 2009 - 11:48 AM

me too is the victim of the same issue... I checked it in Vista, Windows 7 but the same...I was thinking the increase the ram to 8gb but will it worth increasing...am afraid

#25 User is offline   Tripredacus 

  • K-Mart-ian Legend
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 8,690
  • Joined: 28-April 06
  • OS:Server 2012
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 May 2009 - 01:27 PM

View PostAntartica, on May 19 2009, 01:48 PM, said:

me too is the victim of the same issue... I checked it in Vista, Windows 7 but the same...I was thinking the increase the ram to 8gb but will it worth increasing...am afraid


Welcome to the MSFN!

:hello:

If you want more than 4GB (or 3.2GB) of RAM, you need to upgrade to a 64bit version of Windows. XP, Vista and 7 32bit will only see 4GB even if you have more than that installed. Its a waste of money on RAM. Your other option is you can get the RAM now, knowing full well you can't use it, and then get a 64bit OS later.

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy