Jump to content

johk

Member
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Spain

johk last won the day on April 30

johk had the most liked content!

About johk

Profile Information

  • OS
    none specified

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

johk's Achievements

18

Reputation

  1. I could say that on same video test, about of 3 seconds less, from about 12 seconds to 9-10. That's about a 25%, not the 42% stated, on my Core 2 Duo, but less would have been nothing :)
  2. I'm not going to get in to details, but I had to switch to the old resolver to test a couple of things and I also tested yt-dlp. And surprise (what else would I be here for?), the curl_cffi component of yt-dlp that was theoretically responsible for the DNS extensions request problem, look like doesn't require the DNS extensions now :-? I just wanted to post it. I don't care about the reasons (I'm not going to dig on it). Just mention it.
  3. I hope that is a fix for the regular and constant CPU spikes happening after visit sites with loads of JavaScript (example comes to mind: Twitter). After leave the site, is a constant rate of CPU spikes wherever you browse then. For now I leave the update for tomorrow or later, but I really hope it fixes it. With the summer heat, having spikes constantly rising the CPU temperature is insane, even when you are browsing plain text sites. OFF-topic, isn't the Google chatty a bit off-topic here? I don't use Google since about 10 years, preferring, by far, Bing/Yahoo (same engine), and since Bing hardcoded redirects as links to sites, duckduckgo now. Google is not a trustable search engine since long ago. I have a personal example that... I prefer not to share... but if you find my content, won't be because Google, so make a favour to yourself and use any other search engine that actually index Internet.
  4. From the engine (omni.ja>goanna.js): As always, that can only be understood by developers.
  5. I'm using the win64 version of NewMoon 28, so, I guess that won't help me. Whatever, I'm just reporting what I see, simply that I takes a lot of CPU and hangs/unresponsive when before didn't 🤷 As a shame, more than a complain. I don't know how Mozilla did with 115ESR but I really wish it is achieved the same smoothness (without hangs/locks/unresponsiveness) with Goanna/UXP or which ever is the root cause. Thanks for your work, yours, Moonchild's and whoever tries to make this alternate engine/browser alive. I could use alternatives, or buy a more powerful second hand computer, but sadly, is not possible for everyone.
  6. After these days using the latest build of NewMoon 28, I would say, that, despite I don't have BSODs, it hangs quite a lot, and by hang I mean that the window becomes unresponsive a lot. If the page has lots of javascript, prepare yourself to have an unresponsive window. Before, it just, well, got the CPU high and no more, but now... oh my... high CPU usage and totally unresponsive. In my case, might be the patch applied to win32k.sys, but one way or the other, it is crazy how often it happens compared to previous versions. As I said previously, this didn't happen on 20260411 and earlier. I don't know if I would agree what modnar said above for NewMoon 28 too, but whatever CPU threading that the engine has now is a killer at whatever level.
  7. Answered through PM to avoid off-topic.
  8. So, in the end, I was right with my early findings about the CPU usage even Moonchild had to confirm I just really hope that those thread parsing corrections help to make NewMoon/Goanna engine smoother, on CPU I mean. The actual smooth would be accomplished on the javascript engine (as Firefox 115), someday... ------- FOLLOWS, AFTER ALL OFF-TOPIC ----- Sorry if I haven't replied these days, I've been testing RAM (that you know it takes loooooooot of time) with thunderstorms in the middle that didn't allow me to even plug the PC and now I'm fixing problems on a family member PC. And the RAM and processor are fine. In the meantime I rechecked all my previous debuglogs (made with debug wizard help) and, even the "probably caused by: win32k.sys" is very... (as any other with microsoft) imprecise, and I never considered it to be the real problem, I searched and applied the latest(?) win32k.sys update named KB3095649 which, in theory, might help, but as told, I haven't had time to test yet, because I was able to reproduce intentionally the BSOD, so I guess I could test. Answering to other mentions, the disk is not the problem as, long ago, decided to run the profile on a ramdisk (made with ImDisk) thanks to the decision long ago form Mozilla, and so MoonChild, and so Gecko and Goanna engine, to use an sqlite database for the history. You can't believe the performance hit that is managing those databases on disk, really. It is a continous read/write. And Firefox, using localStorage on sqlite databases for browser cache... you couldn't believe the performance difference of running it on a ramdisk. Anyway, I'm digressing right? I will test if NewMoon now crashes the system (not because of NewMoon but because I found a good testing vector), but that is something on my side. EDIT 2026-05-01T03:30+2: for what I tested before go to sleep, I couldn't reproduce the BSOD, so, fingers crossed, let's hope I don't have new BSODs with NewMoon as vector for win32k.sys BSOD, nor any other program. Or maybe today wasn't the same environment and didn't crash. The upcoming days will tell. And I hope the newer NewMoon builds, without the Goanna engine CPU hog, would be helpful as well.
  9. Ok, you are the programmer :) But it was very coincidental that at the same time NewMoon freeze, I went to try to close it and BSOD :S Anyway, I won't use the 20260425 build as, for whatever reason, gives me problems.
  10. And you know what they say, that if you play with fire your end burning yourself. Well I got a BSOD (I didn't have one since a couple of years) when testing the 20260425 build in safe mode. I send the dmp minidump privately to you @roytam1 as I think it might have some personal information. You don't allow PMs, OK, if you want the dmp tell me and I'll send the link though K-meleon forum PMs. I have to go to sleep now. See you.
  11. And it works on the last week build 20260418 too @VistaLover Well, for the sake of testing while I have it on a ramdisk, I didn't notice that palefill stopped working, so I did the fix mentioned, changing strict compatibility to false on install.rdf, and while now can be installed and, I guess, works, on the latest build, 20260425 it still hangs/freezes, so the palefill availability is not the culprit of the hangs/freezes. Why doesn't happen to you @roytam1? No clue. Is just visit github.com/notifications and after load, freeze (unresponsive window to any interaction, except close). I don't have the means to debug it.
  12. I'm not under XP, I use NewMoon x64 under Windows 7. One way, or the other, good or bad job (as I'm not blaming roytam at all, but reporting), the thing is that now NewMoon freezes more, after the 20260411 build. Even if 20260418 doesn't freeze that much, it just did on this page. On 20260411 and earlier, didn't. It is true that GitHub is very intensive, but until 20260425, and particularly about February or March builds, GitHub rendering on NewMoon has enhanced a lot, as there were some glitches with some site functions that drive you to empty pages, as for example mark threads as read/done, and now (until 20260418 because 20260425 just freezes) works better. There shouldn't be a difference if it runs on XP or Win7. In my opinion.
  13. Updated from 20260411 to 202650425 of NewMoon 28 64 bits resulted in high and long CPU usage and now it hangs on loading github notifications. Back to 20260411 and all is fine. The latest build is, by far, slower on my Core2Duo CPU. If I have to bet, might be the following update: "- Issue #3045 - backport of bug 1350760 - atomization fast-path improvements (b44216a883)" When I read atomization.... I thought... this is going to give problems... I haven't tested that intermediate build, as it was introduced on 20260418, because I can't download it at this rate (barely 10KiB/s) This is the reason I don't like to update, if I don't need to :/ (un)expected consequences. If it works, don't do anything. EDIT 20260425T20:50+2: Damn it, after I wrote the slow download it downloaded a minute later. With 20260418 doesn't crash on github.com/notifications and it is smoother. Changed back to 20260425 and it hangs and I have to force close
  14. Don't worry, as I knew this was going to happen soon or later, I had to "resign" and I spent time on testing another version and alternate software. But thanks to give this extra time to read, test, etc. So far so good, tested this new yt-dlp build, and works. But it is a shame because, as every software nowadays (despite the version I'm using now is still old, but isn't less true that the newer, in regard to the OPT DNS extension, hasn't evolved since) it lacks features the original software had and quite a few more issues. Newer doesn't mean better and almost all at MSFN, or these threads, more or less, agreed with this statement, and that is the sad story :/ EDIT: still, I don't find the need for this tool to require it. It doesn't add anything special, less as the behavior described earlier. Nonsense.
  15. @Mark-XP yes,that is the message; that page is actually for developers, that is the reason you can't see anywhere. It was created by Cloudflare after the block to Palemoon and any based browser and was published on Palemoon forums so people could test. I use myself to test if my browsers work. Maintain a list of sites using Cloudflare's trunstile would be endless, just only in my country. The only one able to rise this to CloudFlare is roytam, registering as a developer and signing some undisclosing contract. I don't remember the exact procedure told a year ago in the Palemoon forums.
×
×
  • Create New...