rds_correia

Thank you very much for your reply, kliu0x52. I don't use the check multiple file feature and that's why I never really thought about where to place the checkmark. As for the speed issue, I just noticed that you're right. It does have influence having the file in cache and it is why HC has been slower than HT. It's because in my trials, I always try hashing a file with HC and after that I hash it with HT... Dumb of me for not having noticed. Cheers

Hi there code65536, Excellent tool and excellent features! I do miss one thing: a green check mark right next to one of the hashes when I paste a hash which matches the ones found by hashcheck. Although there is already a feature that highlights a matching hash I'd say that a green icon right next to it "à lá" hashtab would make it a killer app. Speaking of hashtab, I wouldn't like this to turn into a hashcheck vs hashtab thread just because of my comparison but I have to ask this: is it normal for hashcheck to be a whole lot slower than hashtab when reading a file to show hashes? I've made a lot of trials with both hashtab and hashcheck on their x86 versions (hashtab v2.3.0 vs hashcheck v2.1.11) and hashtab always wins and most of the times it wins for more than a couple of seconds per 20 megabytes hashed. Am I using/installing hashcheck in the wrong way or is this ok? I'm fine with hashcheck's speed but the hashtab speed comparison was inevitable and the results are quite conclusive. Sorry 'bout that mate and keep up your excellent work on hashcheck and cmdopen. Cheers