GDragoN Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Hi,I have seen a lot of instructions for making Nero installations. Well, they definilty work, but some people have problems with that repacking removing components. Since we all (more or less) make DVD installations, there is no 700 MB limit to fit all stuff in. Why to loose time packing Nero and loosing time in the install process to unpack that. I use the simple method of includding complete Nero unpacked on the DVD.Nero will take 250 MB for all features (Nero, NeroVision & NeroPlayer). You can install all features or every feature sepparatly. Nero 6.6 Reloaded has following folders:Common FilesCoverDesignerNero 6Nero Media PlayerNero Vision Express 3RedistAnd Setup.exe Multiinstaller.So I use this for RunOnceEX:REG ADD %KEY%\007 /V 1 /D "\"%SystemDrive%\Install\Nero\Nero 6\Setup.exe\" /SN=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX /WRITE_SN /SILENT /NO_UI /NOREBOOT /NOLICENSE" /fREG ADD %KEY%\007 /V 2 /D "\"%SystemDrive%\Install\Nero\Nero Vision Express 3\Setup.exe\" /SN=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX /WRITE_SN /SILENT /NO_UI /NOREBOOT /NOLICENSE" /fYou can make the same instruction for Media Player, because I don't use it.You will save time and nerves for creating rar installers, removing stuff from the installation, because you can delete what ever you want after installing program; simply delete folders from Program Files/Ahead folder you don't need.In the RunOnceEX REG keys you see up there you can see sequence \". This you must use because the path to the setup.exe files have blank characters, and you need to use quotes.This will work with any version of Nero 6. Just unpack the whole installer and you will get all stuff in one place.Millan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucketbuster Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Doesn't, copying over 250 mb, take longer than copying over 32 mb and unrar it?And why would you waste 200+ mb on your DVD? I hope you are using a dvd-rewritable P.S.: Not everybody has a DVD-burner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoffeeFiend Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 I leave the installer as is - no repacking, I really don't care if there is a extraction screen with filenames listing, in fact, it actually shows something is hapenning. It's only 70mb, doesn't take much space on my DVD.It looks like not that much people install from DVDs actually, it's kinda surprising. But then again, even if you have a DVD writer (drives and media IS dirt cheap nowadays) that doesn't mean all the PCs you'll install to have DVD drives (after all, aren't unattended discs for that?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDragoN Posted October 28, 2004 Author Share Posted October 28, 2004 To bucketbusterWell I don't copy all files. Big installations like Office and Adobe programs, Nero and other I keep on DVD and install from it.To crahak:This is mostly for home use, prepering discs for multiple machines can be done differently.Millan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge1 Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 P.S.: Not everybody has a DVD-burner That would be people like me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totoymola Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 I leave the installer as is - no repacking...Same here. Because Nero's compression is better. I wonder which compression utility they use to compress their releases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiMoNsAyS Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 I leave the installer as is - no repacking...Same here. Because Nero's compression is better. I wonder which compression utility they use to compress their releases. rar archive for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mei Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 The real good solution is to make a NSIS LZMA-compressed installation that extract the install files and run the setup silently... It is the best solution in order to save place when you have all the 4 package + language translation to install. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totoymola Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 I leave the installer as is - no repacking...Same here. Because Nero's compression is better. I wonder which compression utility they use to compress their releases. rar archive for sure Really? But if I extract the contents of the original nero installer and repack it using best compression of winrar, the output file is still bigger than the original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucketbuster Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Did you check "create solid archive"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buletov Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Doesn't, copying over 250 mb, take longer than copying over 32 mb and unrar it?i don't think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now