willpantin Posted October 16, 2003 Share Posted October 16, 2003 Wonder what made willpantin think his svcpack.in_ was still in I386, if he had run file.bat?Yep, I had made a BIG, clumsy mistake when I posted that comment. You see, I had placed the whole sp2 Directory in the I386 folder, when it was all the contents of that Directory that needed to be put in there...!Anyway, very happy with the end result. Knocked off about 30 minutes from my original install...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted October 16, 2003 Author Share Posted October 16, 2003 r4v3n, I believe applying MDAC 8 will require the same syntax as 2.7 SP1 if I remember correctly (has to be extracted). Plus, its a lot bigger to carry onto the CD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denney Posted October 17, 2003 Share Posted October 17, 2003 RaveRod - The Update rollup covers 824146 (MS03-039) already, so its been removed from the main list Hmm... wonder why 824146 still comes up in Windows Update...EDIT: NVM... seems that 824146 still shows up WITH the rollup package on Windows Update until you install the rollup package... Seems unusual why they'd do this though... ahwell... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marztabator Posted October 17, 2003 Share Posted October 17, 2003 How come your guide doesn't say anything about cabbing the new svcpack.inf afterwards? I thought that was mandatory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosh Posted October 17, 2003 Share Posted October 17, 2003 You don't have to cab svcpack.inf. You can if you want, but you'll only save like 1k.-gosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziuck Posted October 17, 2003 Share Posted October 17, 2003 I have done the rollup and downloaded the current svpack.inf. After install when I go to windows updates it says that I do not have Q330994 and Q828750 installed. These are in the updates folder along with all the other updates. Any idea why these would not install. I have tried this 4 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted October 18, 2003 Author Share Posted October 18, 2003 Paste a copy of everything in svcpack.inf, and maybe a screenshot of all your files in the "update" folder if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenlau Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 Does anybody find that after installing the Update Rollup 1, be it using Express or in the SVCPACK, it still appears on the Windows Update site?Even reinstalling the Rollup makes no difference.Is this another MS "feature"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bachus Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 I'm finding that I'm having that problem, too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziuck Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 Here is my svpack.inf file and also a screen shot of my update folder[Version] Signature="$Windows NT$"MajorVersion=5MinorVersion=1BuildNumber=2600[setupData]CatalogSubDir="\i386\Update"[ProductCatalogsToInstall]KB826939.cat[setupHotfixesToRun]update.exe -q -nQ330994.exe /Q:A /R:NJS56NEN.exe /Q:A /R:NQ816093.exe /Q:A /R:NQ819696.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ823182.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ824105.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ824141.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ825119.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ828026.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ828035.exe /Q /U /N /ZQ828750.exe /Q:A /R:Nqchain.exeWhy would 330994 and 828750 not get installed but everything else does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bachus Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 I have the same layout, and here's the log file (it's a bit long, but I figure it all might be important. )KB826939.log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dare2001 Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 Does anybody find that after installing the Update Rollup 1, be it using Express or in the SVCPACK, it still appears on the Windows Update site?Even reinstalling the Rollup makes no difference.Is this another MS "feature"? Hi,I have just completed a clean install using Virtual PC and when I went to Windows update it said part of Rollup 1 was still to be installed so I did it, then checked it.Attached is my log file and windows update is still wanting to install a 284k part of rollup 1.I hope someone can sort this out.Cheers,dare2001KB826939.log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveXP Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 you two have the same as me even the logs are the same but if you check file version and file dates it shows that the Rol=Up is installed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dare2001 Posted October 18, 2003 Share Posted October 18, 2003 you two have the same as me even the logs are the same but if you check file version and file dates it shows that the Rol=Up is installed.Looks like it could be a glitch on M$ part.I jut ran QFECHECK and all is well Cheers,dare2001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenMachine Posted October 19, 2003 Share Posted October 19, 2003 ExtrasThese files can also be installed using svcpack.inf without needing any switches:DirectX 9.0b OPKWindows Media Player 9Movie Maker 2WMP9 and MM2 BundleCan be downloaded from: http://msfnforum.cjb.netI believe only the DX9 and Bundle are switchless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts